![]() |
Originally Posted by jay_dubya
(Post 28036849)
Wow.
So even booking business class doesn't avoid BE. |
Originally Posted by lotrbfme
(Post 28037829)
If you read my post you will see that I was booked in Business transcon too and was downgraded to basic economy without seats and no possible "upgrade". I was given the same compensation as OP. 10k miles. A joke. AA is a joke anyways. If they didnt control most of MIA I would travel with United or Delta
Update: I got 7,500 miles and a form letter for my troubles. I can only imagine what one gets when they are on an Economy fare. |
Dammit, AA made it very clear to their agents that they were not to use B inventory when rebooking non-basic economy passengers. My guess is that the inadvertent booking into B was the product of previous training to rebook into the lowest available inventory.
On an otherwise full flight with availability Y1 H0 S0 N0 Q0 O0 B1, I'd wager that most agents would instinctively choose B over Y, even more so if they're not fully versed in the basic economy product. I doubt many agents have even seen a passenger traveling on such a fare yet, and agents at stations that aren't BE markets wouldn't have had much of a reason to pay attention. The B inventory in markets where BE is not offered may be "phantom" and automatically tied to availability in higher inventories.
Originally Posted by matrixwalker2012
(Post 28036609)
Why not just rebook in full Y like they sometimes do? I find the IRROPS rebooking in Y does two things, it gives the tickets max flexibility and the extra EQMs can do a good job at getting most pax to shut up and not come back asking for more. If crediting to a different program, the extra miles gained from full Y can also do a good job at getting those pax to not complain.
|
It would be way too easy for IT to imbed a script that upon rebooking, it would automatically choose the original fare booking class or higher. ;)
|
I think the real travesty is the seeming inability of any front-line agents to rectify these screw-ups. QIK limitation? Or just poor service?
|
Originally Posted by ijgordon
(Post 28046653)
I think the real travesty is the seeming inability of any front-line agents to rectify these screw-ups. QIK limitation? Or just poor service?
|
Originally Posted by flyerCO
(Post 28047202)
Agree. At least with DL when they moved to their version of QIK left access to the normal system. Thus way agents could fix things. At AA it's sorry we need to call someone or my favorite borrowed from KLM, "that is not possible."
|
Originally Posted by bedelman
(Post 28037482)
Often1 very sensibly suggests a DOT complaint in order to increase the likelihood sure that the right people at AA are alerted, and that the problem is fixed in full. That rings true to me. Note that the best way to escalate in this way is via a "formal" DOT complaint, procedure at http://www.benedelman.org/dot-complaints/ , not the informal process at https://airconsumer.dot.gov/escompla...nsumerForm.cfm . The formal complaint goes straight to AA lawyers, not customer service staff, and AA will be required to respond to the entire interested public and officially and on the record. Much more accountability this way.
|
Originally Posted by jay_dubya
(Post 28036849)
Wow.
So even booking business class doesn't avoid BE. Definitely some weird stuff going on with regards to Basic Economy these days. |
Originally Posted by ExpatExp
(Post 28059105)
A colleague just changed the dates of her flights (CX, paid J, booked through AA) and received an email confirmation from AA warning that she was in Basic Economy, with seats in CX J :rolleyes:
Definitely some weird stuff going on with regards to Basic Economy these days. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:45 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.