Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

Rumor: LUS A321 fleet to be standardized, 190 seats

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Nov 4, 2018, 9:00 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: JDiver

We have changed horses as Oasis is being rolled out with 19 738s converted, the 7M8 in the fleet, and the A321 Oasis densification and dense A321neo arrive early 2019.

The dedicated threads are

https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/american-airlines-aadvantage/1938807-a321-32b-old-densified-a321-32b-oasis-aircraft-swap-seat-loss-etc.html

and

https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/american-airlines-aadvantage/1935763-738-original-dense-7m8-densified-738-oasis-aircraft-swap-seat-loss-etc.html.

The archived thread rolling this out
Print Wikipost

Rumor: LUS A321 fleet to be standardized, 190 seats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2017, 7:04 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Programs: American Airlines Platinum, National Executive
Posts: 3,790
Ever since the US/AA merger, I've seen airlines as near-monopolies, focused on ruthlessly extracting as much cash out of us as possible, and offering only the bare minimum necessary to extract that cash.

This is yet another example. Even in FC, we're just cattle with dollar signs attached to us.
ibrandsguest is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2017, 8:58 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 5,270
Originally Posted by newyorkgeorge
"Densification" what a word. I wonder how much a consultant was paid to come up with that gibberish.
Obviously that's not a word that any competent airline would pay for or use in their corporate comms -- nor has AA, as far as I can tell.
rjw242 is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2017, 10:50 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Austin, TX - AUS
Programs: AA Platinum, Hilton, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott
Posts: 1,625
Originally Posted by muishkin
It could be worse. They could do a BA and introduce a "Club America"? F cabin with the same economy seats, each with the middle one blocked off.
Or give "First class" a few extra inches legroom and start calling it "Main Cabin Extra".
Austin787 is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2017, 6:28 am
  #64  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by rjw242
Obviously that's not a word that any competent airline would pay for or use in their corporate comms -- nor has AA, as far as I can tell.
Yeah I think it was just Gary's, used a bit sarcastically (and I did as well.)
JonNYC is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2017, 12:25 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: BA DL
Posts: 179
Originally Posted by rjw242
Obviously that's not a word that any competent airline would pay for or use in their corporate comms -- nor has AA, as far as I can tell.
Yes, no competent airline would use such a word in their corporate comms...

However, BA makes heavy use of the word "densification" in their Capital Markets Day presentation to investors

http://www.iagshares.com/phoenix.zht...-presentations
wingzing is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2017, 2:35 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: LGA, JFK, LAX, SFO
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 303
Okay, so with the past rumor that they were going to increase F to 20 this math might make sense. Let me know if anyone agrees.

20 F
32 MCE
138 MC

For a total of 190. You see a reduction of MCE with an increase of F and MC.
brc757rr is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2017, 3:03 pm
  #67  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: DCA/IAD/WAS
Programs: MAR AMB, WOH Explorist, AA EXP, UA 2P
Posts: 2,138
Originally Posted by brc757rr
Okay, so with the past rumor that they were going to increase F to 20 this math might make sense. Let me know if anyone agrees.

20 F
32 MCE
138 MC

For a total of 190. You see a reduction of MCE with an increase of F and MC.
if they increase to 20 F seats I'll be quite happy. I have yet (knock on wood) to sit in coach on the 321 and four more F seats will make that less likely.
iadisgreat is online now  
Old Apr 29, 2017, 3:16 pm
  #68  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
Programs: AA- EXP UA - Silver SPG- PLT Marriott- PLT
Posts: 759
Originally Posted by USFlyerUS
Parker mentioned on the last earnings call that AA felt it had a few ways to increase capacity on existing aircraft. I forget his exact words but this was mentioned. I suspect he was talking about the A321 fleet (along with the existing 772 mods underway). DL manages to have more seats on its A321s without sacrificing the passenger experience; of course, this comes with the caveat that DL opted for smaller galleys and different lavatory locations.

Also, HP never had A321s. Those were introduced to the "HP fleet" only after the HP-US merger. And, the old US A321s had a ridiculously big F cabin. While obviously great for upgrades, it wasn't great for RASM or CASM.
how many seats in FC did the old US 321s have? I find it shocking they had any more than 16.
chicagoflyer1976 is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2017, 3:17 pm
  #69  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Usually in SAN or Central Europe.
Programs: AA:EXP/1MM. Accor/Radisson:Silver; HH:Gold; ICH:Plt Amb.
Posts: 22,307
Originally Posted by logicalrealist
There's also an airliners.net post about the 737 Max 8s going to 174 seats, and others getting an increase as well. I don't know about the veracity - http://www.airliners.net/forum/viewt...?f=3&t=1361743
I could see maybe stretching the seat count to 168 by removing one row of F and inserting two rows of Y (160-4+12=168) and decreasing the amount of MCE rows. But I don't see how they could get to 174 seats. Because I doubt thay they would go to 8F on this aircraft. As it is the largest type in AA's fleet.

And about the 321s...
Does anyone know the procedures involved with shifting around the lavatories? Because somewhere in the past, I recall a poster mentioning that there is a lot of FAA bureacracy involved in doing such a change (as opposed to just adding-- or taking out-- a row of seats).
Fanjet is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2017, 4:21 pm
  #70  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AUS
Programs: AA Exec Platinum/MM, DL Gold/MM, Hilton Diamond, Accor Platinum, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 6,975
Originally Posted by travelgeek1197
I say:

2) Reduce F pitch to 28
BA's Club Europe is now down to 29-30", so your suggestion isn't as far fetched as you might have meant it.
Stripe is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2017, 7:08 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DCA
Programs: AA Executive Platinum
Posts: 2,085
Originally Posted by chicagoflyer1976
how many seats in FC did the old US 321s have? I find it shocking they had any more than 16.
Prepare to be shocked. 26. As a silver, I never flew in coach on any 321 flight, systemwide, until they went to 16F post HP merger. They flew with 26F/143Y from 2001-2008, when Parker changed them to the current config as US-West started receiving new deliveries.
GotCalcio4 is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2017, 10:26 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: COU
Programs: AA EXP, Bonvoy Ambassador, Hertz PC
Posts: 499
Originally Posted by newyorkgeorge
"Densification" what a word. I wonder how much a consultant was paid to come up with that gibberish.
Slightly more than the guy who wanted to call it "indensination."
HLCinCOU is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2017, 10:56 am
  #73  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Chicago
Programs: AAdvantage Platinum
Posts: 34
Gary Leff: Will American Eliminate a Row of First Class From 737s?

If this is not fake news, then it is absolutely horrifying:

http://viewfromthewing.boardingarea....st-class-737s/
AAflyerORD is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2017, 11:10 am
  #74  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 5,270
I think we have different standards for what constitutes "absolutely horrifying."

If 16 seats is higher than the optimal number from a business standpoint, then it makes perfect sense for them to consider a reduction.
rjw242 is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2017, 11:11 am
  #75  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 143
It's definitely time for the FAA to step in and mandate minimum pitch and width limits.
George Purcell is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.