ARCHIVE: Speculation: Possible Routes (Flights) and Hubs, Discussion - 2015 on
#271
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newton Centre, MA, USA
Programs: DL 2MM Gold, AA Plat Pro; Hilton Lifetime Diamond, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium (via SPG), IHG Plat
Posts: 2,192
And I'm kind of doing the reverse. I could fly BOS-JFK-LHR or BOS-PHL-LHR on AA (since I want AA metal rather than BA metal out of Boston), and I am choosing to fly through PHL because it is a better airport for connections and on time. Admittedly this isn't going to AMS, put my point is that PHL has advantages and PHL is an important hub to AA. I don't see them dropping PHL-AMS any time soon.
#272
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: PHL
Programs: AA
Posts: 342
And I'm kind of doing the reverse. I could fly BOS-JFK-LHR or BOS-PHL-LHR on AA (since I want AA metal rather than BA metal out of Boston), and I am choosing to fly through PHL because it is a better airport for connections and on time. Admittedly this isn't going to AMS, put my point is that PHL has advantages and PHL is an important hub to AA. I don't see them dropping PHL-AMS any time soon.
#273
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 167
I agree. And it makes sense to route that connecting traffic through PHL as opposed to JFK, which is why it's cheaper. And then charge PHL hub-captives a premium to fly direct from PHL. The problem is PHL is right down the road from a competitive NYC market, which means that people not willing to pay the premium for PHL can fairly easily just use a NYC airport - which drives down load factors and O&D from PHL. Nevertheless, I don't see the PHL hub going anywhere.
Last edited by Cltfc; May 24, 2016 at 7:34 pm
#274
#275
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: AA EXP 1MM, UA 1K 1MM, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Plat
Posts: 400
With United starting SFO-SIN and SQ's intention to restart n/s LAX and NYC service when appropriate aircraft arrive, is there any room for AA to consider LAX to SIN? Would existing 788s make it or would 789s/359s have to be the aircraft?
It may impact Cathay and AA service to HKG, but why let Star Alliance have all of the n/s service?
It may impact Cathay and AA service to HKG, but why let Star Alliance have all of the n/s service?
#276
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 366
I think they want to feed both JFK and PHL, thus why they keep BWI-JFK as well as BWI-PHL. Neither is for O&D so it's pure feeder activity going on. Arguably PHL has more feeder activity as it's a bigger hub, but for those long haul non domestic flights, it's select markets that help fill a flight.
PHL has flights to the alternate NYC airports (SWF, ISP, HPN), which is interesting feed.
I've wondered if AA benefits from keeping routes like ISP-PHL or not. On one hand, AA increases it's NYC exposure by being at ISP. On the other hand, a pax that opts for ISP-PHL-{any major market} isn't opting to support AA at LGA or JFK where AA is not the dominant carrier but it's competitive for AA. Someone opting for ISP-PHL-RDU is basically wasting time connecting at PHL when they could be taking the AA nonstop on LGA-RDU, even if the commute time to originate at LGA adds one hour.
Regarding HPN: considering that B6 flies HPN-FLL, why doesn't AA fly HPN-MIA? I think it'd be a popular route. It seems like AA isn't even challenging B6's lock on HPN-Florida.
PHL has flights to the alternate NYC airports (SWF, ISP, HPN), which is interesting feed.
I've wondered if AA benefits from keeping routes like ISP-PHL or not. On one hand, AA increases it's NYC exposure by being at ISP. On the other hand, a pax that opts for ISP-PHL-{any major market} isn't opting to support AA at LGA or JFK where AA is not the dominant carrier but it's competitive for AA. Someone opting for ISP-PHL-RDU is basically wasting time connecting at PHL when they could be taking the AA nonstop on LGA-RDU, even if the commute time to originate at LGA adds one hour.
Regarding HPN: considering that B6 flies HPN-FLL, why doesn't AA fly HPN-MIA? I think it'd be a popular route. It seems like AA isn't even challenging B6's lock on HPN-Florida.
#277
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
With United starting SFO-SIN and SQ's intention to restart n/s LAX and NYC service when appropriate aircraft arrive, is there any room for AA to consider LAX to SIN? Would existing 788s make it or would 789s/359s have to be the aircraft?
It may impact Cathay and AA service to HKG, but why let Star Alliance have all of the n/s service?
It may impact Cathay and AA service to HKG, but why let Star Alliance have all of the n/s service?
I'm not convinced that UA's SIN nonstop will be wildly successful. Just because planes can fly a route nonstop doesn't mean there will be sufficient high-yield passenger traffic to make it work.
Even if UA's flight is successful, I don't think that AA is going to start LAX-SIN anytime soon. SIN O&D is not that substantial; ICN O&D is much larger, and I would expect AA to begin LAX-ICN before SIN.
I've wondered if AA benefits from keeping routes like ISP-PHL or not. On one hand, AA increases it's NYC exposure by being at ISP. On the other hand, a pax that opts for ISP-PHL-{any major market} isn't opting to support AA at LGA or JFK where AA is not the dominant carrier but it's competitive for AA. Someone opting for ISP-PHL-RDU is basically wasting time connecting at PHL when they could be taking the AA nonstop on LGA-RDU, even if the commute time to originate at LGA adds one hour.
Years ago, when AA bought Business Express, it gained service between BOS and ISP.
#278
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
The 787-8 could not fly LAX-SIN nonstop with a viable payload, so it would require the 787-9 or the A350.
I'm not convinced that UA's SIN nonstop will be wildly successful. Just because planes can fly a route nonstop doesn't mean there will be sufficient high-yield passenger traffic to make it work.
Even if UA's flight is successful, I don't think that AA is going to start LAX-SIN anytime soon. SIN O&D is not that substantial; ICN O&D is much larger, and I would expect AA to begin LAX-ICN before SIN.
Interesting questions. ISP is a great airport for Long Island residents and visitors, but even WN basically abandoned ISP once it got over its "primary airport phobia."
Years ago, when AA bought Business Express, it gained service between BOS and ISP.
I'm not convinced that UA's SIN nonstop will be wildly successful. Just because planes can fly a route nonstop doesn't mean there will be sufficient high-yield passenger traffic to make it work.
Even if UA's flight is successful, I don't think that AA is going to start LAX-SIN anytime soon. SIN O&D is not that substantial; ICN O&D is much larger, and I would expect AA to begin LAX-ICN before SIN.
Interesting questions. ISP is a great airport for Long Island residents and visitors, but even WN basically abandoned ISP once it got over its "primary airport phobia."
Years ago, when AA bought Business Express, it gained service between BOS and ISP.
ISP is a great little airport. While it means connecting in PHL the parkways to LGA or JFK are nightmarish, particularly at certain times of the day. Of course, cheaper fares from LGA or JFK.
#279
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,259
With United starting SFO-SIN and SQ's intention to restart n/s LAX and NYC service when appropriate aircraft arrive, is there any room for AA to consider LAX to SIN? Would existing 788s make it or would 789s/359s have to be the aircraft?
It may impact Cathay and AA service to HKG, but why let Star Alliance have all of the n/s service?
It may impact Cathay and AA service to HKG, but why let Star Alliance have all of the n/s service?
Next year, AA will receive the 268 tonne MTOW A350-900, which, given a planned configuration of somewhere around 320 passengers, would give it a range of 7,600 nm, which is roughly the same distance between LAX and SIN. Airbus is planning on making/modifying the standard A350-900 to 280 tonnes, giving it an extra 500 nm in range. All A350-900s delivered after 2019 will have a MTOW of 280 tonnes. (This NOT the A350-900ULR. The ULR version will have extra fuel, giving it a range of over 9,000 NM. The 280 tonne MTOW A350-900 could not make it on EWR-SIN, even with a low density as SQ is proposing). Thus, sometime next decade, if AA elects to do so, they could modify their 22 A350-900s to the 280 tonne MTOW.
The 280 tonne MTOW A350-900, without cargo and blocking a varying number of seats throughout the year, COULD make LAX-SIN. With all this being said, I'd be stunned if AA were to announce LAX-SIN in the next 10-15 years. Yes, the often dismissed MIA-JNB has a much better chance than LAX-SIN. The A350-900/787-9 both have ridiculous fuel efficiencies and capabilities. With 22 of each coming into the fleet over the five years, AA's Pacific operations are finally going to become viable and continue to expand.
#280
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,603
#282
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
I don't have figures for LAXSIN O&D, but according to AA, in 2015, the total SIN O&D nationwide was 515 PDEW. HKG was 2.2 times the SIN O&D and ICN was just under 2.5 times the SIN O&D. PEK was 3 times SIN and both PVG and NRT were 4 times the SIN O&D.
One challenge with Singapore is the big, fairly high-quality state-owned carrier, SQ.
One challenge with Singapore is the big, fairly high-quality state-owned carrier, SQ.
#283
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: los angeles, calif.
Programs: Alaska Airlines Gold MVP
Posts: 7,170
SINLAX is around 120 daily passengers each way. Larger than many long haul destinations that support LAX service including Guangzhou, Zurich, Cebu, Istanbul and Dublin.
#284
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,259
If I'm not mistaken its the largest market for SIN ex-North America. New York is second and the bay area is third.
#285
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: UA Million Mile, Mileage Plus Premier 1K, SkyMiles Gold Medallion, AAdvantage Gold
Posts: 875
With United starting SFO-SIN and SQ's intention to restart n/s LAX and NYC service when appropriate aircraft arrive, is there any room for AA to consider LAX to SIN? Would existing 788s make it or would 789s/359s have to be the aircraft?
It may impact Cathay and AA service to HKG, but why let Star Alliance have all of the n/s service?
It may impact Cathay and AA service to HKG, but why let Star Alliance have all of the n/s service?
AA has other priorities before SIN. Just looks at all of the Asia/Pacific cities UA served from SFO before SIN.