AA award miles reinstatement / redeposit fees, issues, questions thru 30 Jun 2020
1. I just learned a ticket I booked for a family member cannot be used due to a sudden medical issue. The 12500 miles are not worth the $150 reinstatement fee. That fee is excessive. I believe the only other time I've cancelled an award flight was on Virgin America, and it was only $75 to reinstate the miles. And of course Southwest charges $0.
Isn't it counterproductive to charge more for a reinstatement than the miles are worth? I'm not going to go to the hassle of cancelling now, they can find out at the gate. 2. I was booking a flight 2 weeks out. AA charges a $75 late fee, BA, for the same flight, charges $5. I think other airlines that charge this fee only do so 2 weeks rather than 3 weeks before travel. Maybe they have become worse too. I don't mind fees for actual service, but this just seems to be random nickel and diming. |
There is no cost to cancel the ticket, the cost is only associated with re-depositing the miles if you wish to
If the passenger is likely to be able to use the ticket before its expiry date, then can always change the date to another date for free I would suggest that 12,500 miles is worth more than $150 rather than the miles being worth less than $150. To purchase 12,000 miles would cost $384.75 As far as how other schemes work, different schemes are better in some ways and worse in others BA may allow a late booking, but generally the redemption rates may be quite high plus a lot more charges in carrier surcharges e.g. for LHR-SYD AA would charge 80,000 points plus taxes ( and surcharges if on BA ) for a 1st class flight vs 150,000 points plus carrier surcharges plus taxes I would suggest that a $75 booking fee would be better |
AA fees are excessive and above competitors
And really not much different that other competitors. For instance, UA charges $200 for redeposit the miles. DL charges $150 for the same service.
Just cancel the ticket and pay the fee only of you find another use. I also agree 12500 miles are worth more than $150. |
Originally Posted by humesd
(Post 23618611)
I'm not going to go to the hassle of cancelling now, they can find out at the gate.
|
Thread moved to correct forum (AA and US continue to operate as separate airlines at this time), and retitled to conform to Rules and omit incorrect information. (Original title can bee seen as post title.)
/Moderator |
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
(Post 23618662)
I would suggest that 12,500 miles is worth more than $150 rather than the miles being worth less than $150. To purchase 12,000 miles would cost $384.75
|
I think AA should offer the option of a no monetary cost, 100% miles cost, redeposit fee option.
So you don't pay anything in cash, lose the miles (similar to not flying), but get back the taxes. |
The fees are fixed so you pay the same if you spent 12,500 miles or 125,000 miles so it's a better bargain for premium intl awards. Which miles should be spent on ;-)
|
Originally Posted by mikew99
(Post 23618800)
Notwithstanding the other points you raise, I'm not sure that this is the best play. I understand that AA allows you to change the dates for free, so if you change to the latest possible date in the future, there is a non-zero chance that there will be some sort of schedule change that would allow you to cancel and redeposit for free. If you don't have an immediate use for the miles, it's worth a shot.
If you don't have many miles, 12,500 isn't worth $150. If you have enough that that is the difference, say between F and J NYC-HKG, then it is definitely worth it. Regarding the ultimate point: most people seem to be saying that because other legacy carriers have similarly priced redeposit fees, this renders this in some way fair... but what United does says nothing about AA's practice. The essential question isn't whether this is the rule (it is) or whether this is industry norm (it is). The question is whether this industry norm is fair. I'd submit the answer is no. One camp would argue that since this is indeed a ticket, paid for in an alternative "pseudo-currency", then the airline is actually losing access to revenue when a ticket is cancelled, and so just like normal nonrefundable tickets they can charge for a cancellation. The difference here is that the miles are captive assets, and can only be redeemed on AA, and so are worthless in the open market. They are already "on the books" with AA. So it is more like a change fee: your money (miles) are with us, and still with us, and you pay for the pleasure of finding a different way to ensure we get them. If you view mileage awards as tickets, paid for in miles, then this reading works: you pay a change fee and can use the balance of your ticket (the miles) any way you want (i.e. with more miles, etc). The change fee/voucher system is in place to ensure your money stays with AA. And yet this doesn't work because of the fact that miles are a restricted currency from the beginning. Since you don't have the power to remove them from AA (and never did) and use them in the competitive marketplace, you are powerless in the first place to "shop around", and so your miles were captive in the beginning. You never had the choice of where to spend them, and so you don't give up any market freedom by booking an award ticket, whereas you do when you book a nonrefundable ticket. There never was any freedom, nor competitive market in the first place. Therefore there should be no change fee. My two cents! |
Originally Posted by bmchris
(Post 23620228)
I think AA should offer the option of a no monetary cost, 100% miles cost, redeposit fee option.
So you don't pay anything in cash, lose the miles (similar to not flying), but get back the taxes. I do think if you cancel the ticket without redepositing you get the taxes back. But that's hardly an issue for most here. |
Originally Posted by danpeake
(Post 23620419)
You mean the $5.60 on what I assume is this one way domestic ticket.
While not a lot in terms of amount, it goes a long way in principle. The current policy, AA not only keeps what they gave you, but also keeps what was to be paid to the government (do they pay it for no shows?). Either way, it's a nice gesture to say we're refunding you what would have been paid to a third party and not taking advantage of the situation, let along the $150 fee. |
It's pretty ridiculous! They should waive this for platinum as well. They do it for Exec Plat. Gold should be $75. Non elite, sure!
|
Originally Posted by fedaputz
(Post 23620778)
They should waive this for platinum as well.
Making EP benefits more common is not a solution. There also needs to be true recognition of the EP level. As someone who almost always flies paid F (my company has an over 3 hour flight policy), the free redeposit for EPs is something I would greatly value over PLT. The big thing is not just the redeposit fee, but the number of award seats available. I expect they would dramatically be reduced if PLTs were allowed free redeposits. |
Originally Posted by FlightWhite
(Post 23620250)
Regarding the ultimate point: most people seem to be saying that because other legacy carriers have similarly priced redeposit fees, this renders this in some way fair... but what United does says nothing about AA's practice. The essential question isn't whether this is the rule (it is) or whether this is industry norm (it is). The question is whether this industry norm is fair. I'd submit the answer is no. One camp would argue that since this is indeed a ticket, paid for in an alternative "pseudo-currency", then the airline is actually losing access to revenue when a ticket is cancelled, and so just like normal nonrefundable tickets they can charge for a cancellation. The difference here is that the miles are captive assets, and can only be redeemed on AA, and so are worthless in the open market. They are already "on the books" with AA. So it is more like a change fee: your money (miles) are with us, and still with us, and you pay for the pleasure of finding a different way to ensure we get them. If you view mileage awards as tickets, paid for in miles, then this reading works: you pay a change fee and can use the balance of your ticket (the miles) any way you want (i.e. with more miles, etc). The change fee/voucher system is in place to ensure your money stays with AA. If Aadvantages terms are onorous , then can either not collect miles or simply collect to another scheme whose terms are better for that person. If BA or QF's cancellation policies make them better for ones use, then use them If the OP feels that the $144.40 cost to redeposit the miles is not worth it, then that is the OP's choice |
Originally Posted by fedaputz
(Post 23620778)
It's pretty ridiculous! They should waive this for platinum as well. They do it for Exec Plat. Gold should be $75. Non elite, sure!
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.