Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

AA Daily LAX-HND Service Feb 2016 w/ 787-8, applies DFW-HND

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 18, 2015, 8:34 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: JDiver
AA Begin Daily 787-8 LAX-HND Service 11 Feb 2016, DFW-HND on application

FORT WORTH, Texas, Nov. 4, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- American Airlines will offer customers daily, year-round, nonstop service to Tokyo's Haneda Airport (HND) from its trans-Pacific gateway at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) beginning Feb. 11, 2016. Customers can book travel on the new route starting Sunday, Nov. 8. American recently secured takeoff and landing time slots at Haneda Airport from the Japanese aviation authorities, which will allow the commencement of the flight.

The new service will operate on the following daily schedule (all times local):

LAX-HND
AA27
Departs LAX at 6 p.m.
Arrives at HND at 11 p.m. the following day

HND-LAX
AA26
Departs HND at 1:30 a.m.
Arrives at LAX at 6:20 p.m. the previous day

Link
Link to Dallas Morning News article on DFW-HND 23 Jun 2016 (comparing DFW vs. MSP for Haneda service)

Link to Dallas a Morning News Aviation Blog article on DFW-HND application, 4 Apr 2016

Please see this archived thread for posts relating to AA statement of intent and delays.

Previously (as posted by Exec_Plat), wandering_fred and ashill:

DOT Docket is DOT-OST-2010-0018
AA's application to fly LAX-HND (and motion to transfer DL's authority to fly SEA-LAX) is document DOT-OST-2010-0018-0384

On June 14, 2015, the DOT ruled that Delta would retain the HND slot for use on SEA-HND with dormancy conditions that require Delta to operate the flight every day of the year.

On June 17, 2015, Delta notified the DOT in a letter that it would "determined that it is not commercially feasible to operate the slots allocated to Delta for Seattle-Haneda service on a consistent daily basis year-round". The last Delta SEA-HND flight will operate on September 30, 2015. Delta will return the slots to the DOT on October 1, 2015, at which point the slots will automatically revert to American.

American service on LAX-HND could begin (err rather could have begun) as early as October 1, 2015.

While DOT has granted rights to AA, the actual time slots in which AA can arrive and depart HND are subject to negotiation with HND and other carriers.

- It is not clear that DL had slots every day of the year, and in fact DL may have been required to surrender the slots on August 15, 2015.
- AA needs to secure daily slots for HND, however the annual winter 2015 (W15) slot conference was on June 23, 2015, only a few days after DL notified DOT they would surrender the route.
- It is unknown when AA will acquire new time slots. Purportedly the IATA slot conference for S15 will be 10-12 November. Going by the published calendar Oct 8 begins this activity: https://www.iata.org/events/Document...activities.pdf
-There may be some motion with daytime slots (Aviationweek):
The U.S. Transportation Department (DOT) recently briefed U.S. carriers on the Japanese proposal, several people familiar with the matter told Aviation Daily. As it is currently understood, the proposal would shift some of the slots available to U.S. carriers to daytime hours. It may also include one additional slot pair, which would likely not be for a daily flight
- Per the published guidelines, the SAL Deadline is October 29, 2015, at which time the airport shall have made their initial decision on all slots to be allocated for the coming season. [One assumes horsetrading then begins.]
Print Wikipost

AA Daily LAX-HND Service Feb 2016 w/ 787-8, applies DFW-HND

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2016, 5:24 pm
  #106  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Programs: AY+ Plat, Marriott Plat, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 2,846
Originally Posted by Fanjet
I'm not understanding the math. Currently there are 8 HND-U.S. flights. Four on NH/JL. Four on UA/AA/DL/HA. If 10 daytime slot pairs are opened up while 2 nighttime ones are reduced. Doesn't that make a net increase of 8 slot pairs total, not 4 (going from 8 to 16)? Or are NH/JL currently utilizing some daytime slot pairs?
Going from 8 to 12 (10 daytime, 2 nighttime) is a change of 4, no?
flyingeph12 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 5:39 pm
  #107  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Usually in SAN or Central Europe.
Programs: AA:EXP/1MM. Accor/Radisson:Silver; HH:Gold; ICH:Plt Amb.
Posts: 22,307
Originally Posted by flyingeph12
Going from 8 to 12 (10 daytime, 2 nighttime) is a change of 4, no?
But that was my question. Are the Japanese carriers currently using daytime slot pairs for their HND-U.S. service; so there aren't 10 new daytime slot pairs being added, but 6? If that's the case, then yes, it's a net gain of 4 slot pairs. If they are using the nighttime slot pairs like the U.S. carriers, then it is a net gain 8 slot pairs over the existing 8.

Last edited by Fanjet; Jan 24, 2016 at 5:46 pm
Fanjet is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 5:54 pm
  #108  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PDX
Programs: AA PLT
Posts: 174
Originally Posted by Fanjet
But that was my question. Are the Japanese carriers currently using daytime slot pairs for their HND-U.S. service
Currently there are NO daytime HND-US route authorities for any airline.

Joejones' communication what that nighttime authorities would be reduced *to* 2, not be reduced *by* 2.

Last edited by radarskiy; Jan 24, 2016 at 5:56 pm Reason: additional reference to earlier post
radarskiy is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 5:54 pm
  #109  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: LHR
Programs: AA EXP, DL DM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,032
Originally Posted by Fanjet
But that was my question. Are the Japanese carriers currently using daytime slot pairs for their HND-U.S. service; so there aren't 10 new daytime slot pairs being added, but 6? If that's the case, then yes, it's a net gain of 4 slot pairs. If they are using the nighttime slot pairs like the U.S. carriers, then it is a net gain 8 slot pairs over the existing 8.
The Japanese carriers are using nighttime slots. JL's HND-SFO leaves at 12:05 AM, NH's HND-LAX also at 12:05 AM, and JL's and NH's HND-HNL both leave around 10:30 PM (this last one is confusing -- I thought the slots were meant for departure after midnight?)
taxicabnumber is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 5:59 pm
  #110  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Usually in SAN or Central Europe.
Programs: AA:EXP/1MM. Accor/Radisson:Silver; HH:Gold; ICH:Plt Amb.
Posts: 22,307
Originally Posted by radarskiy
Currently there are NO daytime HND-US route authorities for any airline.

Joejones' communication what that nighttime authorities would be reduced *to* 2, not be reduced *by* 2.
OK. So they will be going from 8 nighttime slot pairs to 2 total. And not be reducing the nighttime slot pairs by 2, from 8 to 6. Got it. Now the math makes sense. 10 (daytime) +2 (nighttime) = 12 (total).
Fanjet is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 5:59 pm
  #111  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PDX
Programs: AA PLT
Posts: 174
How many times did Delta actually serve SEA-HND during their "non-cancelled" previous winter season? It would be interesting to see how long it will take AA to have accumulated more service than Delta provided with the HND route authority.
radarskiy is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 6:20 pm
  #112  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Usually in SAN or Central Europe.
Programs: AA:EXP/1MM. Accor/Radisson:Silver; HH:Gold; ICH:Plt Amb.
Posts: 22,307
Originally Posted by radarskiy
How many times did Delta actually serve SEA-HND during their "non-cancelled" previous winter season? It would be interesting to see how long it will take AA to have accumulated more service than Delta provided with the HND route authority.
I'm not sure. But they really abused that route authority. Aside from the equipment downgauging, they reduced the weekly frequencies. Suspended it in the off season. Actually, how long did they have that route authority? Two years?

But here's the hypocrisy. The reason why DL could not make that flight work was because of the nighttime slots. That would not have been the case if it used daytime slots at HND.
Fanjet is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 6:47 pm
  #113  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TYO / WAS / NYC
Programs: American Express got a hit man lookin' for me
Posts: 4,596
Just started a new speculation thread on the Japan forum: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/japan...eculation.html
joejones is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 8:40 pm
  #114  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by bbmatt
Oh, I meant to non-US destinations. If delta successfully lobbies DOT to reject the deal wholesale, wont they have to/want to give the 10 slots to someone else?
Ahh, now I see what you were saying.

I suppose they could do that, but that would make NH and JAL angry, as they want to fly daytime HND departures to the USA.

Originally Posted by Fanjet
I'm not sure. But they really abused that route authority. Aside from the equipment downgauging, they reduced the weekly frequencies. Suspended it in the off season. Actually, how long did they have that route authority? Two years?
The transfer from DTW to SEA happened sometime in 2013, so DL had it almost two years.

For the six month winter season of 2015, DL planned to fly the route 17 times out of 182 days, prompting AA to petition the DOT to take it away.

Originally Posted by Fanjet
But here's the hypocrisy. The reason why DL could not make that flight work was because of the nighttime slots. That would not have been the case if it used daytime slots at HND.
You may be right, but I disagree. SEA has significantly less TYO O&D than LAX or SFO, and IMO, the lack of O&D made SEA-HND extremely challenging. According to AA, in 2014, LAX featured 593 TYO O&D PDEW while SEA had but 129 TYO O&D PDEW. Not only did DL fly to HND but also flies to NRT plus NH flies NRT to SEA. It's just too small a market.

Delta made excuses to the DOT, but didn't mention the nighttime slots as having hurt the SEA-HND route. Delta did say this in response to AA's petition:

Due to low forecast demand this winter and the rapidly expanding
but not-yet-mature Seattle hub, it was commercially necessary to make seasonal reductions this winter.
The case for Seattle-Haneda is even stronger today. Delta is moving aggressively to develop Seattle as a hub with new Delta and Delta Connection-operated service, both domestic and international. While it has been challenging to establish Haneda service, as we continue to implement our Seattle strategy we have seen passenger traffic and profitability surge. In fact, Delta’s Summer Season SEA-HND 2014 performance improved by an astounding 54% percent year-over-year. Buoyed by this unexpectedly strong summer 2014 performance, Delta has offered a full pattern of daily Seattle-Haneda service in summer 2015 and anticipates a more regular schedule next winter.
http://www.regulations.gov/contentSt...ontentType=pdf

Lotsa excuses from Delta, but no whining about the nighttime slots.

Why would nighttime slots kill doom SEA-HND while SFO-HND and LAX-HND apparently work with nighttime slots? Sure, DL would like daytime slots at HND instead of the current arrangement (who wouldn't?) but I think it's a stretch to say that SEA was impacted by the permitted timing when it's simply too small a market. On top of that, DL's lack of connection opportunities at HND will make any DL HND route more challenging than for AA/JL or UA/NH.

AA's filings showed that no other airline treated HND as a seasonal market yet DL argued that it should be allowed to treat SEA-HND as seasonal. AA argued that TYO is not a seasonal market from the USA for any airline, except DL's assertion that SEA-HND was seasonal.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 9:06 pm
  #115  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Metal Card (OWE), SAS Eurobonus Gold (*G), Marriott Titanium (LTP), Tokyu Hotels Platinum
Posts: 21,156
Originally Posted by Fanjet
I'm not understanding the math. Currently there are 8 HND-U.S. flights. Four on NH/JL. Four on UA/AA/DL/HA. If 10 daytime slot pairs are opened up while 2 nighttime ones are reduced. Doesn't that make a net increase of 8 slot pairs total, not 4 (going from 8 to 16)? Or are NH/JL currently utilizing some daytime slot pairs?
According to the article, only 2 night time slots remain. A reduction of 6 night time, and the addition of 10 daytime seems to be the direction right now. If HA will try to hang on to the both the night time slots, it could put NH and JL in a good position for the daytime slots provided an equal country split of the total number.
CPH-Flyer is online now  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 9:17 pm
  #116  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted by CPH-Flyer
According to the article, only 2 night time slots remain. A reduction of 6 night time, and the addition of 10 daytime seems to be the direction right now. If HA will try to hang on to the both the night time slots, it could put NH and JL in a good position for the daytime slots provided an equal country split of the total number.
Only airline I imagine that would want the additional night time slot is HAL to start KOA-HND. Its the only remaining potential flight left that makes sense with those times.
Longboater is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2016, 9:38 pm
  #117  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by Longboater
Only airline I imagine that would want the additional night time slot is HAL to start KOA-HND. Its the only remaining potential flight left that makes sense with those times.
I don't think there's an "additional" nighttime slot; the current 8 nighttime flights (4 for USA and 4 for JAPAN) is reduced to 2, one for each country's carriers. If the overnight hours work for HA for HNL, then I have to assume that the overnight hours work for NH and JL, and one of them will likely keep its overnight HI flight. HA would likely get to keep its nighttime HNL flight, and I doubt that HA would win any daytime frequencies.

Of the 5 daytime flights for USA carriers, assume the current 3 flights are switched to daytime, and that would leave two new daytime frequencies for AA, DL and UA to fight over.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2016, 12:05 am
  #118  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Usually in SAN or Central Europe.
Programs: AA:EXP/1MM. Accor/Radisson:Silver; HH:Gold; ICH:Plt Amb.
Posts: 22,307
Originally Posted by Longboater
Only airline I imagine that would want the additional night time slot is HAL to start KOA-HND. Its the only remaining potential flight left that makes sense with those times.
Since there will be 2 nighttime slots left, wouldn't that be 1 each for a U.S. and Japanese carrier? I believe HA will be starting HNL-NRT in a few months. So perhaps they will keep the nighttime slots for their HNL-HND service. However, as long as strict slot constraints remain for U.S. carriers at HND, HA should never be allowed to operate KOA-HND.
Fanjet is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2016, 1:29 am
  #119  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tokyo
Programs: DL Diamond, ANA Platinum
Posts: 1,532
Originally Posted by CPH-Flyer
Since AA would as minimum need to maintain a code share on NRT-LAX there could be some discussions with JAL on who gets to maintain the Narita route. JL may also be interested in moving Los Angeles to a Haneda departure.
Actually, this isn't true. If I interpret the Narita Rule correctly, they need to maintain flights to the same country, not necessarily the same airport.

Last edited by FireEmblemPride; Jan 25, 2016 at 1:35 am
FireEmblemPride is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2016, 1:45 am
  #120  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 291
I'm planning to book LAX-HND in June in Y and apply a SWU. How likely is SWU gonna clear from Y to J?
Thanks
mbfanos is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.