Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

Post-Devaluation Equipment Change [No more F, then F is back, now more miles]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Post-Devaluation Equipment Change [No more F, then F is back, now more miles]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2016, 12:22 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
Angry Post-Devaluation Equipment Change [No more F, then F is back, now more miles]

In January we booked 2 round-trip, per-devaluaiton, MileSaver Awards in First Class, MIA to CDG, on the 3 cabin 777.

I happened to check in February and found that the equipment changed to the 2 class 767, with the new 1-2-1, business class. While disappointed, I called in to change the seats (so my wife and I would be together) and to be sure that they refunded the extra-miles I had used.

Yesterday, I saw that they changed back to the original 777 with first class - and we have been given seats in the old 2-3-2 business class. I called AA to ask that they re-assign us to the first class seats as originally booked, but was told that yes there was award space - but that I would now have to pay the current miles, or almost 70,000 more than we originally booked in January.

I spoke to several agents who said this would not be grandfathered because I called in and changed the seats thus "accepted" the new itinerary. They could not articulate a specific policy.

Thus, we have gone from first class seats, to the new business class seats, and now to the old business class, all due to equipment changes - and with a refusal to return us to the seats we originally booked without paying new rates.

Any suggestions or options?
dwrucklaw is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 2:07 pm
  #2  
Moderator: American AAdvantage, Signatures
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London, England
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador, National Exec, AA EXP Emeritus
Posts: 9,765
Thread had been approved out of the moderation queue, sorry for the delay on that.

~Moderator
Microwave is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 2:40 pm
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by dwrucklaw
In January we booked 2 round-trip, per-devaluaiton, MileSaver Awards in First Class, MIA to CDG, on the 3 cabin 777.

I happened to check in February and found that the equipment changed to the 2 class 767, with the new 1-2-1, business class. While disappointed, I called in to change the seats (so my wife and I would be together) and to be sure that they refunded the extra-miles I had used.

Yesterday, I saw that they changed back to the original 777 with first class - and we have been given seats in the old 2-3-2 business class. I called AA to ask that they re-assign us to the first class seats as originally booked, but was told that yes there was award space - but that I would now have to pay the current miles, or almost 70,000 more than we originally booked in January.

I spoke to several agents who said this would not be grandfathered because I called in and changed the seats thus "accepted" the new itinerary. They could not articulate a specific policy.

Thus, we have gone from first class seats, to the new business class seats, and now to the old business class, all due to equipment changes - and with a refusal to return us to the seats we originally booked without paying new rates.

Any suggestions or options?
Hard as it is to hear, I'd say all correct. Once you were refunded the miles, game over. -That- was the time to try and preserve the grandfathered F-award.

Nothing to be done now, you have a business class award.
JonNYC is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 2:40 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Programs: AA EXP 3MM; LH FT (*A Silver); Marriott Rewards Platinum Elite; Starwood Corporate Preferred
Posts: 782
But you got the miles refunded from your original change, right? If so I'm kinda with AA on this....you accepted the change and got a refund.

Now if you had just left it and "ignored" the schedule change under the general assumption of schedules change frequently up until about 3 months out...then I'd be more on your side. You would still have an F ticket and not a J ticket.

Sorry I don't really have any other ideas. Except hope for another change back to a new aircraft or for last-minute discount F award availability (routinely available 1 to 2 days before departure if enough seats are still unsold).
AAExpDFW is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 2:42 pm
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by AAExpDFW
...Except hope for another change back to a new aircraft or for last-minute discount F award availability (routinely available 1 to 2 days before departure if enough seats are still unsold).
That won't do anything to address having to pay the new rates, which is the main thrust of the complaint, as I read it.
JonNYC is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 2:55 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Programs: AA EXP 3MM; LH FT (*A Silver); Marriott Rewards Platinum Elite; Starwood Corporate Preferred
Posts: 782
Originally Posted by JonNYC
That won't do anything to address having to pay the new rates, which is the main thrust of the complaint, as I read it.
But might possibly be cheaper than the 70k being quoted right now for an F award...
AAExpDFW is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 2:58 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by AAExpDFW
But might possibly be cheaper than the 70k being quoted right now for an F award...
I have to admit; now that I re-read your comment-- I'm 100% unfamiliar with this "discount F award availability (routinely available 1 to 2 days before departure if enough seats are still unsold"-- what is that?

And, you sure you're reading this section correctly:

Originally Posted by dwrucklaw
...but that I would now have to pay the current miles, or almost 70,000 more than we originally booked in January.
Originally Posted by AAExpDFW
But might possibly be cheaper than the 70k being quoted right now for an F award...
I think he's quoting 2 pax and/or r/t, possibly.

Last edited by JonNYC; Apr 20, 2016 at 3:04 pm
JonNYC is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 4:47 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca., USA
Programs: AA Lifetime Plat; Bonvoy Titanium Lifetime Elite;Hyatt Globalist; HHonors Diamond; United Silver
Posts: 8,313
You did have the option of changing flights to stay in F on a 3 class, no?
beachfan is online now  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 8:15 pm
  #9  
nrr
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: jfk area
Programs: AA platinum; 2MM AA, Delta Diamond, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,291
How would it play out if OP did nothing (waiting for 3 class service to return--but it DIDN'T)? BC might have filled up on the 2 cabin MIA-CDG; he would be holding an F ticket with no F seats to be had.
nrr is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 9:24 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,230
Originally Posted by nrr
How would it play out if OP did nothing (waiting for 3 class service to return--but it DIDN'T)? BC might have filled up on the 2 cabin MIA-CDG; he would be holding an F ticket with no F seats to be had.
At some point the ticket would probably be reissued (from Z to U) and the miles refunded. The reservation for the biz seats was changed at the time of the equipment change.
ijgordon is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 9:43 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,904
I personally think AA should put him back into Z and just charge the difference between first and business under the old program. It's the same flight and as far as I'm concerned it was an involuntary downgrade. I view this as very customer unfriendly but absolutely not surprising.

I would write into customer service on the website and explain the situation.
chuck1 is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 10:19 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: AUS TUS
Programs: AA PLT, UA GLD
Posts: 993
my opinion is, he "accepted" the change to business, only because AA "forced" him to -- the F seats were no more there, what else choice he had? AA should refund his mile difference. this down-grade is involuntary rather than his choice.

and now AA "reinstated" the 3-class plane, they should reinstate his original tickets too.
mingw is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2016, 12:33 am
  #13  
Moderator: American AAdvantage, Signatures
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London, England
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador, National Exec, AA EXP Emeritus
Posts: 9,765
Originally Posted by mingw
my opinion is, he "accepted" the change to business, only because AA "forced" him to -- the F seats were no more there, what else choice he had?
When the flight was downgauged, that would have been the time for the OP to have requested a different routing that still had F. AA would almost certainly have worked with the OP to do that, and when F came back on this flight I think it's likely they would have moved the OP back onto it in F. Unfortunately that time has passed since the OP accepted accommodation in business at that time.

It's an unfortunate turn of events, but I'm afraid the best option now is to look for another option in business which has fully flat beds, and ask AA to reaccommodate onto that flight in business. That has a much higher chance of succeeding IMO than asking to be put into F under the old award chart.
Microwave is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2016, 1:18 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 291
Originally Posted by Microwave
When the flight was downgauged, that would have been the time for the OP to have requested a different routing that still had F. AA would almost certainly have worked with the OP to do that, and when F came back on this flight I think it's likely they would have moved the OP back onto it in F. Unfortunately that time has passed since the OP accepted accommodation in business at that time.

It's an unfortunate turn of events, but I'm afraid the best option now is to look for another option in business which has fully flat beds, and ask AA to reaccommodate onto that flight in business. That has a much higher chance of succeeding IMO than asking to be put into F under the old award chart.
Totally agree ^
If I were OP, I would have waited until one month or one week before departure to request a refund in miles. Otherwise, I would have requested a different routing.
I'm sorry OP, but AA is "technically" right on this. If AA were an awesome airlines, which unfortunately, they weren't , they would put you back in F and charge you the old miles.
mbfanos is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2016, 6:14 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Programs: AA EXP 3MM; LH FT (*A Silver); Marriott Rewards Platinum Elite; Starwood Corporate Preferred
Posts: 782
Originally Posted by JonNYC
I have to admit; now that I re-read your comment-- I'm 100% unfamiliar with this "discount F award availability (routinely available 1 to 2 days before departure if enough seats are still unsold"-- what is that?

And, you sure you're reading this section correctly:




I think he's quoting 2 pax and/or r/t, possibly.
I see this on a variety of routes. I did this myself last week 2 days before departure. If there are still a number of F (or J) seats on a flight, AA will open up milesaver space. Not on every flight but I grabbed a 30k business saver DFW-YYZ the 2 days before the flight. It was sitting at 65k for J starting 5 weeks out, and then it dropped since it was still J4.

I've seen it on HNL, LHR, CDG, LAX, etc...just depends on route and day of week.
AAExpDFW is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.