FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   American Airlines | AAdvantage (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/american-airlines-aadvantage-733/)
-   -   Airbus A321 Transcon / A321T / "32B" 3 class (master thread) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/american-airlines-aadvantage/1492741-airbus-a321-transcon-a321t-32b-3-class-master-thread.html)

ryan182 Mar 8, 2017 11:01 pm


Originally Posted by SFO_FT (Post 28012120)
Actually, domestic average airfares, by route and carrier, are collected and distributed by the DOT. Carriers are required to provide this data to the government and anyone can see it. For example, between SF and NY for one of the quarters in 2016, the average UA fare was $412 while for Virgin America it was $298.

Yes but VX has only 8 F seats so that's not really a good comparison plus average fare doesn't necessarily equate to profitability.

SFO_FT Mar 9, 2017 12:21 am

Agree. To estimate the profitability, one would take the fares, estimated load factor and seat capacity and then back out a cost per seat mile, which also is available publicly. Network carriers are always challenged to determine individual route profitability, but at least one can get a general feel for profitability. At those fares, I would assume those routes are profitable.

flyerCO Mar 9, 2017 3:39 am


Originally Posted by ryan182 (Post 28011708)
I don't think that AA releases details on a per-route basis. I do know that fares on this market have dropped a lot since Mint started (Thanks B9!!). I've flow in F on this route 4 times the past 12 months, 2 were J bookings upgraded to F and the others the delta between J and F on the days was small enough that it was worth paying the extra but in general the lowest you see J is ~$650 o/w and F is $1200 o/w. Given J is 2-2 and F is 1-1 and about the same length I'd guess that F occupies roughly the space of 2 J seats so the premium of 2x from a space perspective probably makes sense. What probably really matters is how many in F or J are on I or A fares vs F/J since the delta between the lowest J and a flexible J fare is pretty high ($650 vs $3K)

I think I recall that sometime ago the union removed the requirement for 3 cabin F, though I'm sure some still get it but not sure how much the fact that AA has F and others do not is a factor.

The SAG contracts dont reuqire F anymore. In fact I know numerous actors that only fly DL J due to most being wide body, all aisle access, with it being handled as Delta One. I know when booking LAX/JFK I look at DL first for same reasons.

DataPlumber Mar 9, 2017 5:29 am

You know, I've often thought of entering the priesthood

CityFlyerNYC Mar 9, 2017 6:57 am

I overheard one of the FAs talking recently on a transcon. Sounds like they might be considering removing a number of F seats and putting in more J seats. They would still have F but it would be much smaller only a couple of rows. Has anyone else heard this?

3Cforme Mar 9, 2017 7:16 am


Originally Posted by lightbulbs (Post 28011663)
I've always been curious as to the economic analysis on the 321T configuration. In particular
- Three class vs Two class. What's the space efficiency difference between how F and J are configured and how much of a price premium does F need to command to be worthwhile?
- How much load factor and price premium the F and J cabins need to command to offset the low density of the plane overall. It basically flies just over half the passengers of a similarly sized 321B.
- Has AA ever released CASM and RASM stats specific to the transcon routes?
- How do the profitability numbers compare JFK/SFO/LAX/MIA? I presume LAX/JFK is the cash cow given the entertainment labor contracts?
- Ultimately did AA make a good choice compared to the configurations of DL, UA, B6?
- Does AA make much/if any money on the advance O fares in Y? Flying across the country for $130-140 seems to be a pretty good deal.

You ask a bunch of questions that can not be answered with publicly available data. You can spend a lot of time reading anecdotes, and reading 'analyses' offered by people who clearly never took even an intro to econ or business analysis class.

AA is a big carrier with lots of fleet flexibility. The observed facts that they haven't significantly changed the model - 3-class 321Ts and route frequencies comparable to what they started with a few years ago - suggests they're satisfied with it.

ijgordon Mar 9, 2017 8:39 am


Originally Posted by CityFlyerNYC (Post 28013268)
I overheard one of the FAs talking recently on a transcon. Sounds like they might be considering removing a number of F seats and putting in more J seats. They would still have F but it would be much smaller only a couple of rows. Has anyone else heard this?

I heard that from a baggage handler and the curbside check-in guy.

morrisunc Mar 9, 2017 11:02 am

I remember Doug Parker answering a question from a reporter a few years ago about if there was anything that had surprised him in a positive way about the old AA when he took over. He said that he and his team were highly skeptical of the 3 class trancon before they arrived but were very surprised and pleased with how well it did.

When I Travel The World Mar 23, 2017 4:45 pm

Flying LAX-JFK.
All main cabin extra seats free on A321T.

I'm a window guy, could have had the nice space in tow 11, but went with 13A

werDrD Apr 12, 2017 8:49 pm

Transcon A321 on JFK-DCA route?
 
AA website and EF is showing AA 2183 as a weekly (6/3-8/19) Saturday JFK-DCA flight that flying a A321T with 3-class configuration.

Is this for real? Or just some technical glitch?

weirdlyndon Apr 13, 2017 6:09 am


Originally Posted by werDrD (Post 28170658)
AA website and EF is showing AA 2183 as a weekly (6/3-8/19) Saturday JFK-DCA flight that flying a A321T with 3-class configuration.

Is this for real? Or just some technical glitch?

Looks to be real. Not surprising though, since they usually scale back a couple of transcon flights on Saturday, so this is just aircraft utilization. Similar to when they've put the A321T on JFK-BOS.

the phoenix Apr 13, 2017 2:52 pm


Originally Posted by werDrD (Post 28170658)
AA website and EF is showing AA 2183 as a weekly (6/3-8/19) Saturday JFK-DCA flight that flying a A321T with 3-class configuration.

Is this for real? Or just some technical glitch?

Confirmed through an AA ops manager, its not a glitch...for now

jmr50 Apr 13, 2017 7:39 pm


Originally Posted by crazyarmadillo (Post 27817217)
a very good comparison of the two cabins - I would also suggest the F cabin privacy especially at 1A and 1F (if traveling with someone) and the FA dealing with less customers, are the key differentials. So if that isnt what you look for in a flight, then Biz is just as good.

I have spoken with others who travel together - they prefer Biz, so each to their own , I for one, much prefer 1af. And the crew have always been great when sitting there, even tho sometimes, they have to leave the fruit and snacks and do their paperwork at the front sometimes.

I fly both biz and first on this route and while I agree with the privacy angle, the menu and wine seems identical to me.

ijgordon Apr 13, 2017 11:15 pm


Originally Posted by jmr50 (Post 28176094)
I fly both biz and first on this route and while I agree with the privacy angle, the menu and wine seems identical to me.

Pretty sure there's an extra entree choice in First, and plating (if not portions) are larger/nicer.
Also, I think wines are different, or at least First has real Champagne (Lanson Black on my last trips).
Either way, it's not that significant of a difference.

It's more about increased privacy/direct aisle access/no seatmate, and in theory more attentive service.

MarkedMan Apr 13, 2017 11:36 pm


Originally Posted by ijgordon (Post 28176692)
Pretty sure there's an extra entree choice in First, and plating (if not portions) are larger/nicer.
Also, I think wines are different, or at least First has real Champagne (Lanson Black on my last trips).
Either way, it's not that significant of a difference.

It's more about increased privacy/direct aisle access/no seatmate, and in theory more attentive service.

More appetizer and dessert choices too, IIRC. But yes, this is about right for me too. When the service is up to scratch it's a great product. And there is a reason why no one ever compared Continental's seat to some F products, but did so with the nicer implementations of the Cirrus seats. A bogus comparison, to be sure, but it would never have come up with AA's A321 Biz seats.

Given the choice and budget I can't imagine ever picking biz over F on this plane. I appreciate it's no so for everybody, to me it's a no-brainer.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.