Time for AA to drop Fuel Surcharges

 
Old Oct 20, 08, 1:01 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New York City - Metropolitan
Programs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itKz7wjc7ys
Posts: 4,367
Time for AA to drop Fuel Surcharges

I am in the process of planning a trip for 5 people to Brazil. JJ (TAM) and UA have dropped their QY fuel surcharges to $ 60-$ 65 , but American Airlines is still at $ 250. For 5 people that is almost $ 1000 of unnessesary expense. If TAM and United have been able to drop Surcharges, then American Airlines must also be able to do so. Current JET A1 fuel prices are down 30% - 45 % from when these surcharges were imposed and I am sure AA buys its fuel at least as cost-efficiently as JJ or UA , if not better. Wake up AA, with new expanded service to Brazil, now is not the time to play Mickey Mouse with fees and charges making AA tickets $ 200 more expensive . Hope some AA exec reads FlyerTalk
WingedWorldExplorer is online now  
Old Oct 20, 08, 1:21 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,790
I disagree. It's time for AA to make some money. For the first nine months of 2008, AA has lost over a half billion dollars (excluding special items) and has produced negative cash from operations. I want AA to survive - actually thrive - so that my status and accumulated miles are worth something. With premium revenue tanking, now's not the time to drop any fees, IMO. YMMV.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 1:31 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Plano, TX USA
Programs: AA LT Plat, HH Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 171
AA's fuel hedging has it likely paying more than the current daily spot price - such is the risk of doing this. It will take them weeks/months to get out from under these to where they are paying sufficiently lower rates again. Only then would it make sense for them to drop the surcharges.

But of course - the "surcharge" is only compensating for the cost of fuel - therefore should not allow them additional margin - yea right...

Either way, don't hate the player - hate the game....

Michael
lurcher is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 1:40 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DCA, maybe IAD, hopefully not BWI
Programs: AA LT GLD (bitter fmr EXP), Bonvoy Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 546
Originally Posted by FWAAA View Post
I disagree. It's time for AA to make some money. For the first nine months of 2008, AA has lost over a half billion dollars (excluding special items) and has produced negative cash from operations. I want AA to survive - actually thrive - so that my status and accumulated miles are worth something. With premium revenue tanking, now's not the time to drop any fees, IMO. YMMV.
I would tend to agree with this sentiment; we are all stakeholders in the longterm success of AA and have a vested interest in a return to profitability. I know crude futures have dipped but I think it will take a prolonged period of lower prices for AA to start eliminating fees. We all know how energy prices can be volatile and the last thing AA wants is to lower YQ and then see jetA back up to July levels.
njvandy is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 1:46 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MileagePlus Premier Gold
Posts: 11,522
This article gives good reasons why prices are always "sticky downward" regardless of the change in material/fuel costs.
UnitedSkies is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 1:48 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,790
$70/bbl to $80/bbl oil prices may still be higher than the level that allows AA to be profitable under its current model. It's even worse when you consider than oil's fall from $147 to its current price of about half that has been accompanied (maybe even caused by) an impending worldwide slowdown in economic activity. AA's facing a very bleak winter, as are all six (soon to be five) US legacy airlines.

What I find curious is that oil recently fell from historic highs to merely expensive levels (when compared to prices for the last couple of decades) - airline losses are rolling in - and posters are demanding that fuel surcharges be dropped or reduced immediately. Doesn't matter that oil could rise again in the next few months or that airline revenue is heading into the toilet - they want immediate gratification NOW!

If oil had fallen to $30/bbl a year or two ago and airlines were awash in billions of dollars of profits, then I could understand the urgent demands for surcharge reduction. But it's only been a few weeks, people.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 1:55 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,288
Originally Posted by FWAAA View Post
$70/bbl to $80/bbl oil prices may still be higher than the level that allows AA to be profitable under its current model. It's even worse when you consider than oil's fall from $147 to its current price of about half that has been accompanied (maybe even caused by) an impending worldwide slowdown in economic activity. AA's facing a very bleak winter, as are all six (soon to be five) US legacy airlines.

What I find curious is that oil recently fell from historic highs to merely expensive levels (when compared to prices for the last couple of decades) - airline losses are rolling in - and posters are demanding that fuel surcharges be dropped or reduced immediately. Doesn't matter that oil could rise again in the next few months or that airline revenue is heading into the toilet - they want immediate gratification NOW!

If oil had fallen to $30/bbl a year or two ago and airlines were awash in billions of dollars of profits, then I could understand the urgent demands for surcharge reduction. But it's only been a few weeks, people.
Also, OPEC is looking at cutting production to get prices stable and there are a number of unfriendly US oil producing countries (Iran, Venezuela) that want to get oil back to $100.
MiamiAirport Formerly NY George is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 3:39 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,353
BS.

AA decided to link and justify these fuel surcharges based to th escalating price of oil. Thus, they should be reduced as oil drops.

Now, had they decided to just raise their fares. Fair. They don't have to reduce their fares. But AA went the fuel surcharge route, so they should be reduced as fuel declines.

I think that competition will bring these idiots in line.
777lover is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 4:05 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,694
Originally Posted by 777lover View Post
AA decided to link and justify these fuel surcharges based to th escalating price of oil. Thus, they should be reduced as oil drops.
Would you factor fuel hedging in there somewhere? Seem to recall that UA lost $500 million 3rd quarter when they were hedged at $110 a barrel. I don't know what hedging AA has in place, but I bet it's not for $74 a barrel oil.
tom911 is online now  
Old Oct 20, 08, 4:18 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington DC Metro Area
Programs: AA: PP, LTG/1.5M | UA: SLV | Bonvoy LTT | IHG Mbr| Hertz 5 Star | Nat'l Emerald Club EE
Posts: 1,056
Here's an interesting link on aa.com: https://www.aa.com/content/amrcorp/c...urements.jhtml

According to their example, they operated at a loss of 0.6 cents/mile last year. Perhaps that was mitigated by other income, but I don't know.

In any case, that was last year...this year has definitely been worse for AA and others. As has already been stated, airlines provide a service and even for what they're charging now it's relatively cheap. I know for certain I can't drive the places I want to go--on the schedule I want to do it in--for as little as it costs me to fly. And I'd be surprised if that weren't the case for most of us.

I am quite invested in AA; I am also quite willing to pay reasonable prices to keep them in business--so far, they haven't disappointed. YMMV, etc., etc.

cheers!

Last edited by AAir_head; Oct 20, 08 at 4:42 pm
AAir_head is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 4:56 pm
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 41,481
Originally Posted by FWAAA View Post
I disagree. It's time for AA to make some money. For the first nine months of 2008, AA has lost over a half billion dollars (excluding special items) and has produced negative cash from operations. I want AA to survive - actually thrive - so that my status and accumulated miles are worth something. With premium revenue tanking, now's not the time to drop any fees, IMO. YMMV.
I disagree. If the price of fuel has dropped , then the fuel surcharges should be dropped. If the fares are too low, then the actual base fares can be raised, not use fuel as a pretence

Dave
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 5:00 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA CK, A3 Gold, spg100
Posts: 3,875
Originally Posted by Dave Noble View Post
I disagree. If the price of fuel has dropped , then the fuel surcharges should be dropped. If the fares are too low, then the actual base fares can be raised, not use fuel as a pretence

Dave
I completely agree. AA painted themselves into a corner. They should have just increased fares to avoid the backlash when the price of fuel drops but their fuel surcharges don't.
justforfun is online now  
Old Oct 20, 08, 5:05 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,357
Originally Posted by AAir_head View Post
I am quite invested in AA;
cheers!
You'd have to change your handle for a start...
rupert_s is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 5:10 pm
  #14  
brp
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP, BA Silver, AS 75K Gold MVP, and some hotel stuff...
Posts: 32,601
Originally Posted by Dave Noble View Post
I disagree. If the price of fuel has dropped , then the fuel surcharges should be dropped. If the fares are too low, then the actual base fares can be raised, not use fuel as a pretence

Dave
But what matters here- the price of a barrel of oil on the open market, or what AA are actually paying for the fuel? Others here know all the right places to look for this information, and I don't...but I have a strong suspicion that AA are not "reaping the benefits" of the recent drops in their fuel charges. If they're still paying a lot, does the reduction in the open market price still mandate that they drop prices? Perhaps not.

Cheers.
brp is offline  
Old Oct 20, 08, 5:11 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,097
Originally Posted by Dave Noble View Post
I disagree. If the price of fuel has dropped , then the fuel surcharges should be dropped. If the fares are too low, then the actual base fares can be raised, not use fuel as a pretence
Well said--it's called integrity and honesty and that's something that especially those with "vested interest" should be screaming for.
hillrider is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search Engine: