AA's commitment to STN? MaxJet folded 12/24

 
Old Dec 24, 2007, 9:22 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA USA // UA 1K 2 Million Miler, AA EXP 2MM, HH Diamond, SPG Plat // Easily found on SFO-ORDs
Posts: 2,726
AA's commitment to STN? MaxJet folded 12/24

MaxJet filed for Ch.11 12/24, ceasing operations immediately. MaxJet was offering single-class J 762 service. They're really AA's most direct competitor out for STN -- the other carriers (EOS and Silverjet) offer F-level service on 757s. AA hasn't yet begun its second frequency nor finished its lounge.

What do we think the chances of STN service continuing (and two frequencies at that)? I'm guessing the single current service is all that lasts.
1K-SFO is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 10:04 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Programs: BA Gold, AA PLT PRO, AGR, Strawberry (Nordic Choice), Marriott Bonvoy
Posts: 4,224
Originally Posted by 1K-SFO
MaxJet filed for Ch.11 12/24, ceasing operations immediately. MaxJet was offering single-class J 762 service. They're really AA's most direct competitor out for STN -- the other carriers (EOS and Silverjet) offer F-level service on 757s. AA hasn't yet begun its second frequency nor finished its lounge.

What do we think the chances of STN service continuing (and two frequencies at that)? I'm guessing the single current service is all that lasts.
Note that, of these other carriers, Silverjet operates from Luton (LTN) and not Stansted (STN). That makes it a slightly less direct competitor for business. And AFAIK, Silverjet was midway between Maxjet's business class style service and EOS' first class style service.

EOS does fly from STN, but it is aiming at the higher end of the market, I think. More a competitor to F than J -- and AA's flights to STN don't have F (since they use a two-class 767).
salut0 is online now  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 10:29 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,630
Originally Posted by 1K-SFO
MaxJet filed for Ch.11 12/24, ceasing operations immediately. MaxJet was offering single-class J 762 service. They're really AA's most direct competitor out for STN -- the other carriers (EOS and Silverjet) offer F-level service on 757s. AA hasn't yet begun its second frequency nor finished its lounge.

What do we think the chances of STN service continuing (and two frequencies at that)? I'm guessing the single current service is all that lasts.
Depends on the revenue/yield & Margin. If they can make $ the flight will stay. If they have a better place to use the plane, they will move it. STN has low airport fees and allows quick turns compared to LHR & LGW. Also LHR is slot limited. So I think AA will give it a go for a while, but maybe with only one flight.
zman is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 11:38 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SJC/SFO/OAK
Programs: BD Gold (and future SEN), 0.2MM AA EXP, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 3,107
I would think that they would maintain at least 1 flight for a while, just to see how it works out. London is a big market, and London to NYC is a big market, and so far there's been success by EOS and Silverjet in operating out of other airports. AA can basically tout itself as the most complete US-London and NYC-London airline
cstead is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 11:50 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: British Airways Executive Club, United Mileage Plus & bmi Diamond Club
Posts: 1,427
Originally Posted by zman
Depends on the revenue/yield & Margin. If they can make $ the flight will stay. If they have a better place to use the plane, they will move it. STN has low airport fees and allows quick turns compared to LHR & LGW. Also LHR is slot limited. So I think AA will give it a go for a while, but maybe with only one flight.
Everything will depend on $, but isn't the second daily flight on sale already? I reckon we could see an ORD or MIA flight. They may just replicate everything out of LHR & add DFW/LAX etc. etc. Since STN is the only airport in London with reasonable plans to expand, AA should get in there & establish a presence. I'd also expect other carriers to follow namely CO then DL.
flyboy777 is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 12:15 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Coast
Programs: AA-EXP (2.6mm), UA-1P, SQ-PPS, EK-Silver, LH-FTL, SPG-Platinum, HH-Gold
Posts: 80
The just need to fix the STN-JFK departure time.

I just flew LAX-JFK-STN-onward on LCC to EU, and I would have done the same return on AA - but since I am now coming in from the EU, there is no way in heck to connect at STN to a 10:15am departure. Seems they should move it back to 2pm-ish (like one of the LGW-DFW departure)
bb-miler is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 12:31 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA 1K, AA 2MM, Bonvoy LT Plt, Mets fan
Posts: 5,073
AA will also leave things as is for a while - their lawyers want them to remember that it looks bad to kill off the competitor and shut down their own operations immediately...they'll wait til the body is cold first.
CO FF is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 1:04 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 886
Originally Posted by CO FF
AA will also leave things as is for a while - their lawyers want them to remember that it looks bad to kill off the competitor and shut down their own operations immediately...they'll wait til the body is cold first.
I will admit I don't know much about airline business but I have to ask.

On what basis can anyone point the finger at AA for MaxJet demise?

Perhaps I'm naive but I don't see any legal problems for AA if they decided to pull out tomorrow, other then breaking any standing contracts with the airport, if such exist, etc.

Am I wrong?
nacirema is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 1:34 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York
Programs: AA PLT (Lifetime GLD), Hilton Silver, Marriott Silver, AA Dining VIP
Posts: 596
Originally Posted by nacirema
I will admit I don't know much about airline business but I have to ask.

On what basis can anyone point the finger at AA for MaxJet demise?

Perhaps I'm naive but I don't see any legal problems for AA if they decided to pull out tomorrow, other then breaking any standing contracts with the airport, if such exist, etc.

Am I wrong?
I just heard an airline analyst (sory, I didn't get his name) say on the CBS radio network that AA's entry to STN was the cause of MaxJet's demise
AA-Platinum is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 1:36 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: AAdvantage, Hilton
Posts: 3,191
Originally Posted by nacirema
On what basis can anyone point the finger at AA for MaxJet demise?
From a story on msnbc.com:

“High fuel prices were a contributing factor, but American’s inauguration in October of (service between New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport and London’s Stansted Airport) ... was the coup de grace,” said Robert Mann, an airline consultant in Port Washington, N.Y.

While business class service can be very profitable to airlines, it’s also a very “thin” market, Mann said, serving, typically, “40 to 70 seats per flight, depending on the route and aircraft.” Any loss of market share to a competitor can be devastating, particularly to an all business-class carrier like MAXjet that didn’t have revenue from economy passengers — or a robust route system — to fall back on.

“They could not get the current premium class passengers away from major carriers,” said Mike Boyd, president of The Boyd Group, an Evergreen, Colo., airline consultancy.

Link to complete story:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22388471/
sukn is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 1:52 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 886
Originally Posted by sukn
From a story on msnbc.com:

“High fuel prices were a contributing factor, but American’s inauguration in October of (service between New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport and London’s Stansted Airport) ... was the coup de grace,” said Robert Mann, an airline consultant in Port Washington, N.Y.

While business class service can be very profitable to airlines, it’s also a very “thin” market, Mann said, serving, typically, “40 to 70 seats per flight, depending on the route and aircraft.” Any loss of market share to a competitor can be devastating, particularly to an all business-class carrier like MAXjet that didn’t have revenue from economy passengers — or a robust route system — to fall back on.

“They could not get the current premium class passengers away from major carriers,” said Mike Boyd, president of The Boyd Group, an Evergreen, Colo., airline consultancy.

Link to complete story:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22388471/
I'm not disputing the fact that AA was not the cause, but in a capitalist, unregulated market, how can anybody get AA for anything in a court of law?

unless, AA colluded with other airlines to kill MaxJet, then maybe, but otherwise?

I believe one on one competition is the backbone of a capitalist market. Let the best (wo)man win or am I missing something?
nacirema is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 2:58 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,577
RIP: Braniff, Legend, Maxjet. Capitalism well executed by AA.
Exleftseat is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 3:32 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: dublin,ireland AA ( 3mm)
Posts: 1,825
Look for flights in J ex LAX now to climb
eireman is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 4:33 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,310
Originally Posted by EXLEFTSEAT
RIP: Braniff, Legend, Maxjet. Capitalism well executed by AA.
Yes. Also, don't forget Pan Am, Eastern, Western Airlines, Morris Air, Air Florida, Piedmont, too. Thanks!
N830MH is offline  
Old Dec 24, 2007, 6:54 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,358
deleted

Last edited by shoodawg; Jun 9, 2009 at 7:16 pm
shoodawg is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.