Differences in in 763 F/J seats
I don't recall reading about this, nor could find it in search - but apologies in advance if I missed this info on the forum.
We just did LAX-DFW-RDU..RIC-DFW-LAX. The LAX-DFW-LAX legs were on 763s. I don't usually travel on 763s other than domestically on this route. I have read various posts on how some FTers prefer the 763 J seat to the 777 J seat. Well I noticed that not all 763 J seats are created equal. One of the 763s we were on had a great seat with great recline and great foot rest - similar and possibly superior to the 777 J seat. The other 763 had a considerably poorer J seat - recline seemed smaller, the foot rest did not come up very far at all. The single difference I can point to is that the inferior seat had a lumber support "switch" while the superior one had a switch for the seat cushion to move out (ir the bit under your knees as you sit). Also the 763 with the inferior seat had a serving "mantelpiece" in front of 2D/F, which the other 763 I don't recall having. Am I just imagining, or are these different 763 F/J seats? |
I think taht you are correct and I was notcing today as well on my ORD-LAX that the seat was differnet (at least I am pretty sure it was :)) than when I flew JFK-SFO last month. The lumbar was the difference...
|
I think the difference is that one of the aircrafts (can't remember if it's with or without the lumbar) is the new-interior 767 (777-style interior), with curved ceilings and LCD video monitors.
I've been on both, and couldn't notice any other meaningful differences between seat comfort, in terms of pitch/recline. I usually put a small soft carryon on top of the footrest (some put it under I think) to give my legs additional "height". |
I just flew two segments (MIA-MAN/MAN-ORD) on 763s without the new interior and the seats lacked the lumbar support button. I think this is fix that is being applied system-wide as the lumbar function never worked properly. They are also removing the adjustible reading lights. If your seat has an adjustible reading light, it has not been upgraded.
I am yet to see a 763 without the credenza. It's where they store the serving trolleys. |
There are 9 B763s in the AA fleet which have slightly differenct interiors, featuring the Boeing Signature cabins. However, the removal of lumbar support and personal reading lights in J class is an AA cost cutting measure. Along with the removal of curtain holders... which were removed to reduce weight and fuel expense!!!
|
In addition to the much improved overhead storage, the refurbished 763's also have individual air vents/nozzles which really can make a difference on an overnight flight. (On the old 763s, rows 3, 4, 5 seem to be in a hot spot--terribly uncomfortable, if you're trying to get some sleep.)
|
It sounds like one of your domestic "763" segments was operated using a 762 ... those have similar J seats to the 763 but pitch is about 10 inches less than for the 763 (as they aren't used for overnight international flights). I believe all of the 763s had the lumbar switch removed over a year ago ... I certainly haven't seen any since early 2005. This was a marked improvement in the 763 J seat....while removing the reading lamps was because no-one used them. I miss those reading lamps but I can see the logic in the change.
Or maybe AA has pulled a 763 out of the desert (I think there were a few in long term storage, as they had a D check coming up and AA didn't need them for a few years, but I thought those were all ex-TWA birds). |
On the flights with the subpar J, did you walk through a cabin with brown seats up front?
|
Originally Posted by pdb
In addition to the much improved overhead storage, the refurbished 763's also have individual air vents/nozzles which really can make a difference on an overnight flight. (On the old 763s, rows 3, 4, 5 seem to be in a hot spot--terribly uncomfortable, if you're trying to get some sleep.)
|
Originally Posted by pdb
In addition to the much improved overhead storage, the refurbished 763's also have individual air vents/nozzles which really can make a difference on an overnight flight.
Originally Posted by number_6
Or maybe AA has pulled a 763 out of the desert (I think there were a few in long term storage, as they had a D check coming up and AA didn't need them for a few years, but I thought those were all ex-TWA birds).
|
Originally Posted by number_6
It sounds like one of your domestic "763" segments was operated using a 762 ... those have similar J seats to the 763 but pitch is about 10 inches less than for the 763 (as they aren't used for overnight international flights). I believe all of the 763s had the lumbar switch removed over a year ago ... I certainly haven't seen any since early 2005. This was a marked improvement in the 763 J seat....while removing the reading lamps was because no-one used them. I miss those reading lamps but I can see the logic in the change.
Or maybe AA has pulled a 763 out of the desert (I think there were a few in long term storage, as they had a D check coming up and AA didn't need them for a few years, but I thought those were all ex-TWA birds). The 762s do not go in or out of DFW, so I highly doubt they'd sub one in on that route. |
Originally Posted by Fly AA J all the way
The 762s do not go in or out of DFW, so I highly doubt they'd sub one in on that route.
|
Originally Posted by JonNYC
I'd still bet good $$ that that's exactly what happened-- there's no other plausible explanation assuming OP's observations were accurate.
One easy way to figure it out: to the OP: When you boarded, was there a separate F cabin, with one single seat in the middle of it? |
Originally Posted by Fly AA J all the way
The 762s do not go in or out of DFW, so I highly doubt they'd sub one in on that route.
Originally Posted by JonNYC
I'd still bet good $$ that that's exactly what happened-- there's no other plausible explanation assuming OP's observations were accurate.
|
Originally Posted by FWAAA
No, but about a dozen a day fly to LAX; it is highly likely that's why the OP noticed such a vast difference in seat pitch and recline.
I agree. I'm guessing that a 762 was subbed for the 763 and that explains the vastly "inferior" J seating observed by the OP. did the video screen have the route map with progress superimposed? if so that's the newer 763. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:40 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.