Originally Posted by malexander131
(Post 25463984)
Interesting tidbit, an AA 772 will take Pope Francis on his US tour and back to Europe. Wonder how far in advance his upgrade clears? ;)
Originally Posted by SeeBuyFly
(Post 25467992)
Does the papal bull travel in the cargo hold, or is it considered an emotional support animal?
The church is not a democracy; rather, the pope rules by fiat. |
Originally Posted by the phoenix
(Post 25469892)
His upgrade is pre-ordained, is it not?.? :cool:^^^:D
Holy Cow!!! The Papal bull reference.....best thing I've read online in ages! I do believe the Papal bull can ride in the hold with the media bull; as there's no WiFi on the 772 pre-CIP, no bull can be released until the aircraft lands in Rome anyway. Noticeably absent: the "Popemobile". |
Originally Posted by Col Ronson
(Post 25469856)
Originally Posted by FlyingDoctorwu
(Post 25469758)
This pope is supposedly about humility and frugality.. would have been awesome to see him take the train from WAS to NYP and then to PHL (or rather WAS to PHL to NYP would be better)... flying a 777 from Andrews to JFK, then JFK to PHL is kind of a waste...
I assume security and congestion issues are the main reason he's flying rather than using any ground transport. It would be harder to secure a ground route, and the security precautions would probably mess up traffic (whether rail or road) for everyone else something awful. I think that chartering a train is rather routine; sports teams do it reasonably often on the Northeast Corridor. If the train made more sense for the pope, it certainly could have been arranged. |
Originally Posted by ashill
(Post 25469956)
I think that chartering a train is rather routine; sports teams do it reasonably often on the Northeast Corridor. If the train made more sense for the pope, it certainly could have been arranged.
|
Originally Posted by ashill
(Post 25469956)
8 hours to get from NYC to PHL or WAS to NYC by train? Huh? The Amtrak regionals (ie the slow train) take 1:15-1:30 PHL-NYP, depending on the train.
I assume security and congestion issues are the main reason he's flying rather than using any ground transport. It would be harder to secure a ground route, and the security precautions would probably mess up traffic (whether rail or road) for everyone else something awful. I think that chartering a train is rather routine; sports teams do it reasonably often on the Northeast Corridor. If the train made more sense for the pope, it certainly could have been arranged. But sports teams have the luxury of time, the pope doesn't. The vast majority of NFL teams also charter flights from commercial airlines as well. If he really wanted to be extravagant he could have chartered a private jet instead. Nobody here is going to be calling an AA 772 a luxurious travel option. |
Pope Francis to Fly AA charter WAS (AAFB)-JFK, JFK-PHL, PHL-FCO
http://www.cruxnow.com/church/2015/09/18/fun-facts-and-more-about-life-aboard-the-papal-plane/
Another interesting article. I think the only correction to make is the FAA call signal was officially changed to Shepherd One as indicated. AA has a planning team working on this for quite some time so everything from the meal service to hosting the reporters (who pay the plane ticket price) has been carefully considered. I know someone is waiting to ask the miles question for the paid tickets. Rasheed |
Originally Posted by rasheed
(Post 25470370)
http://www.cruxnow.com/church/2015/09/18/fun-facts-and-more-about-life-aboard-the-papal-plane/
Another interesting article. I think the only correction to make is the FAA call signal was officially changed to Shepherd One as indicated. AA has a planning team working on this for quite some time so everything from the meal service to hosting the reporters (who pay the plane ticket price) has been carefully considered. I know someone is waiting to ask the miles question for the paid tickets. Rasheed New TATL flight bonus up to 125k miles [NAF15] |
Originally Posted by SeeBuyFly
(Post 25467992)
The church is not a democracy; rather, the pope rules by fiat.
|
I heard he is flying AA to protest the other two for moral reasons, because they have gone revenue and are stealing the FFM from their poor customers to fatten their wallets. He is not down with that kind of sin. :p
|
I remember a flyertalk post or news article that the prior Pope had the entire F section of the plane removed and replaced with just one seat. Anyone have a link?
|
Originally Posted by Col Ronson
(Post 25469856)
There are security considerations to be considered for as well. And it is logistically easier to charter out a plane than to charter out an entire train. Nevermind the pope has a tight schedule but sure lets criticize him for taking a plane and not spending 8 hours going by train.
But logistically the plane is probably easier for everyone involved. Fdw |
Originally Posted by ijgordon
(Post 25470199)
Originally Posted by ashill
(Post 25469956)
I assume security and congestion issues are the main reason he's flying rather than using any ground transport. It would be harder to secure a ground route, and the security precautions would probably mess up traffic (whether rail or road) for everyone else something awful.
Originally Posted by Col Ronson
(Post 25470311)
Obviously i was embellishing a little with the 8 hour estimate :)
But sports teams have the luxury of time, the pope doesn't. The vast majority of NFL teams also charter flights from commercial airlines as well. If he really wanted to be extravagant he could have chartered a private jet instead. Nobody here is going to be calling an AA 772 a luxurious travel option. |
Originally Posted by rasheed
(Post 25470370)
http://www.cruxnow.com/church/2015/09/18/fun-facts-and-more-about-life-aboard-the-papal-plane/
Another interesting article. I think the only correction to make is the FAA call signal was officially changed to Shepherd One as indicated. AA has a planning team working on this for quite some time so everything from the meal service to hosting the reporters (who pay the plane ticket price) has been carefully considered. I know someone is waiting to ask the miles question for the paid tickets. Rasheed
Originally Posted by sjpmurph01
(Post 25470399)
And in case any of those reporters find this post, perhaps they should consider registering for:
New TATL flight bonus up to 125k miles [NAF15] |
Originally Posted by RogerD408
(Post 25471658)
Being it's not an AA marketed flight, miles should not be expected. Now would AA IT mess up and post them??? Totally different question.
|
I'm just waiting for the post about him losing his seat at the last minute due to an air marshal.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:09 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.