FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   American Airlines | AAdvantage (Pre-Consolidation with USAir) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/american-airlines-aadvantage-pre-consolidation-usair-445/)
-   -   ORD flagship lounge access for transcon (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/american-airlines-aadvantage-pre-consolidation-usair/161107-ord-flagship-lounge-access-transcon.html)

tfung Sep 3, 2003 10:24 pm

ORD flagship lounge access for transcon
 
so... I'm flying ORD-SFO-JFK on a paid F ticket tomorrow. Was wondering if I get to go into the Flagship lounge at ORD... My SFO-JFK flight is on a 3 class trancon. If I understand correctly, paid F on those flights still get you into the FL lounge.. at least for Boston.. so would it make sense to get FL lounge access in ORD? Has anyone done this before? Also, just want to make sure that I would get AC access in SFO as well...
Thanks

martin33 Sep 3, 2003 11:13 pm


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by tfung:
so... I'm flying ORD-SFO-JFK on a paid F ticket tomorrow. Was wondering if I get to go into the Flagship lounge at ORD... My SFO-JFK flight is on a 3 class trancon. If I understand correctly, paid F on those flights still get you into the FL lounge.. at least for Boston.. so would it make sense to get FL lounge access in ORD? Has anyone done this before? Also, just want to make sure that I would get AC access in SFO as well...
Thanks
</font>
ORD- no way man.

azmmza Sep 3, 2003 11:28 pm

this is a tuff one, i think you should be allowed access, bec you are traviling in "P" that day, the same way if you went lhr ord sfo and the lhr ord was in f but the ord sfo was in y you would be allowed in,
that being said i doubt the bouncers in ord will let you in http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/frown.gif

Plato90s Sep 4, 2003 6:16 am

Only paid F transcon tickets get you FL access. So flights from BOS or JFK to SFO/LAX qualify.

ORD, not being on the coast, never qualifies under the transcon requirement.

number_6 Sep 4, 2003 6:34 am

You won't be allowed into the FL at ORD. I tried to do exactly the same thing a couple of years ago (before I had QF Platinum) and was told it had to be same day travel -- in my case the qualifying leg SFO-JFK was the next day. If I had flown ORD-SFO-JFK the same day there would have been FL access. AA does protect access diligently, and it is computer monitored. Any exceptions have to be documented by the agent and sneaking someone in can cost them their job.
I was pretty mad but solved the problem easily, by getting QF Platinum status. Now I can use the FL at ORD for every AA flight that I take through there. A very nice perk of Oneworld (AA loves this part, they get to charge QF a hefty fee every time I use the FL or AC).

elCheapoDeluxe Sep 4, 2003 7:44 am

removed due to dyslexia.

[This message has been edited by elCheapoDeluxe (edited 09-05-2003).]

JonNYC Sep 4, 2003 9:29 am


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by elCheapoDeluxe:
I'm presuming you mean AA1486, which is on a 763 (two-class). To the best of my knowledge there are no three class flights on this route.</font>
SFO-JFK served by several three class 762's.

inlanikai Sep 4, 2003 9:37 am

Uh, it looks like he is EXP. Doesn't he get FL access simply because of that?

Plato90s Sep 4, 2003 9:38 am


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by inlanikai:
Uh, it looks like he is EXP. Doesn't he get FL access simply because of that?</font>
Not on purely domestic itinieraries.

JonNYC Sep 4, 2003 9:44 am


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by inlanikai:
Uh, it looks like he is EXP. Doesn't he get FL access simply because of that?</font>

Try that one once and see how hard they laugh.

AA in CA Sep 4, 2003 10:16 am


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by JonNYC:

Try that one once and see how hard they laugh.
</font>
Good Heavens!! We wouldn't want that now, would we?

JonNYC Sep 4, 2003 11:11 am


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by AA in CA:
Play misty for me...</font>

tfung Sep 4, 2003 11:55 am

just tried it... didn't work... the agent said that their FL was only for international flights or other OW Emerald card people... I told them that the BOS FL gave access to transcon F passengers, but the agent said that they were Chicago, and there were no transcon flights out of there... didn't matter that I was on a paid 3 class transcon F later that day...

PresRDC Sep 4, 2003 12:11 pm


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by tfung:
just tried it... didn't work... the agent said that their FL was only for international flights or other OW Emerald card people... I told them that the BOS FL gave access to transcon F passengers, but the agent said that they were Chicago, and there were no transcon flights out of there... didn't matter that I was on a paid 3 class transcon F later that day...</font>
That's absolutely absurd. You should have access as the rules do not specify where you can have access. If I were you, I would write a very sternly worded letter to AA emphasizing that you were on a paid P class ticket.

To deny a P class passenger FL access is just plain stupid.

JonNYC Sep 4, 2003 12:19 pm


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by PresRDC:
That's absolutely absurd. You should have access as the rules do not specify where you can have access. </font>
Notwithstanding the business sense of it all (or lack thereof)-- I don't agree with you in the least-- I think to ask for FL access in ORD based on a connecting transcon (in paid F) does not comport with the rules in any way, shape or form. I don't think anybody thought this would work.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:05 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.