Take the confirmed SWU or hold out?

 

Old Nov 3, 13, 7:01 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA
Programs: Alaska MVP 75k, AA EXP, Subway Sub Club
Posts: 88
Take the confirmed SWU or hold out?

flying back LHR-SFO (right before new years) hoping to use a SWU from Y to J. While I'd love to take AA137 LHR-LAX, there's currently no SWU availability (though biz availability looks wide open). Expertflyer, however, shows open SWU availability on AA 101 to JFK, to AA85 (on a 763).

Conflicted on what to do--take the confirmed availability via JFK (shorter 77W flight), or chance LAX? Ah, first world problems...
saucesee is offline  
Old Nov 3, 13, 8:13 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Frisco, TX; AA PLT, 3 MM
Posts: 137
Originally Posted by saucesee View Post
flying back LHR-SFO (right before new years) hoping to use a SWU from Y to J. While I'd love to take AA137 LHR-LAX, there's currently no SWU availability (though biz availability looks wide open). Expertflyer, however, shows open SWU availability on AA 101 to JFK, to AA85 (on a 763).

Conflicted on what to do--take the confirmed availability via JFK (shorter 77W flight), or chance LAX? Ah, first world problems...
For me, if there's a confirmed SWU, I always take it. Why? There's always the chance of having to fly in the back on the TATL flight, and I REALLY don't want to do that!
gapilot is offline  
Old Nov 3, 13, 8:19 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AA ex-P, Hyatt whatever tier 2 is now, credit card elite in the usual suspects
Posts: 1,711
Confirmed, confirmed, confirmed.

763 is a perfectly cromulent solution in F.

ETA: While LHR-LAX is an awesome long-haul flight in a premium cabin, it's a real drag to fly LHR-LAX-SFO. LAX-SFO isn't for 2 hours (way too long if you have Global Entry) and after an 11 hour flight having to take another short hop sucks. I definitely enjoyed LHR-LAX on my way home, but having done that, I'd be plenty happy doing LHR-JFK-SFO in J/F.

Last edited by djibouti; Nov 3, 13 at 8:25 pm
djibouti is offline  
Old Nov 3, 13, 8:26 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Programs: AA EXP...couple hotels and cars too
Posts: 3,357
Is AA101 a 777? (quick look seems like it is a 77W actually)

I REALLY prefer 77W J over the old tired 777.

Given that it is a day flight, and you need to connect somewhere, Id do the confirmed ...

(are you just going by expert flyer or did you call the exp desk and enquire?)
Exec_Plat is offline  
Old Nov 3, 13, 8:50 pm
  #5  
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,807
As others has posted, immediate confirmability makes LHR-JFK-SFO an easy choice, especially if LHR-JFK is a 77W.
dayone is offline  
Old Nov 3, 13, 9:16 pm
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA
Programs: Alaska MVP 75k, AA EXP, Subway Sub Club
Posts: 88
Thanks all for setting me right in my ways. Confirmed it is. @exec_plat, 101 is a 77W, and I'm using ExpertFlyer to see availability, confirmed via phone call to the ExPlat desk.

Also, given the other thread about the hassle of clearing CBP in LAX, especially after the London flight, it's an even easier call.
saucesee is offline  
Old Nov 3, 13, 11:50 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AA ex-P, Hyatt whatever tier 2 is now, credit card elite in the usual suspects
Posts: 1,711
I've done this exact route (AA 101-AA 85 in J). You won't be upset. :-)
djibouti is offline  
Old Nov 4, 13, 10:58 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SFO, LON
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, Bonvoy Tit, Hilton Dia etc etc
Posts: 2,299
It's plenty good enough for sure, I preferred the timing we had when there was a 12:30 JFK flight too connecting to the 6pm SFO flight, since I didn't need to get up too early to make the TATL flight, but this works well.

Aside from the lack of wifi the 763s are also a much better trip than the 762 J cabins and as djibouti points out the post-arrival connection experience in LA is less than ideal even when not considering CBP, notwithstanding the nice FL. AA85 departs at 8:30pm London time, perfect time for a late dinner and a nap. Even with the earlier flight from LHR, your LAX-SFO won't leave until 3am London time.
MarkedMan is offline  
Old Nov 4, 13, 12:06 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Programs: AA PLT, 1.8mm
Posts: 6,963
Originally Posted by saucesee View Post
flying back LHR-SFO (right before new years) hoping to use a SWU from Y to J. While I'd love to take AA137 LHR-LAX, there's currently no SWU availability (though biz availability looks wide open).
I'm on 137 (LHR-LAX) 12/30 in J, which has been filling up quickly since I booked in June. As others have said, a guaranteed upgrade is better than a waitlisted one on a better plane/route.
cynicAAl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread