View Poll Results: My opinion of the announced AA - US merger is:
This is the best of all possible worlds; great idea!
33
3.93%
This portends a stronger airline, with some changes for all
192
22.88%
I am neutral - pros and cons for all
199
23.72%
I think this is a somewhat bad idea with some real challenges
226
26.94%
I am completely opposed to this merger; terrible idea!
189
22.53%
Voters: 839. You may not vote on this poll
AA - US Merger Agreement / Announcement / DOJ Action Discussion (consolidated)
#871
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: RIC
Programs: US CP, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Plat, *wood Gold, Amex Plat
Posts: 1,600
So how does AA win that US flyer over when they can't promise a stellar upgrade rate, be it comped or paid? Even over at UA I haven't seen reports of midtier flyers clearing in the 90% range. A lot of them are purchasing paid upgrades prior to departure, which is something new over there, jumping over higher tier elites on the list for a variable upgrade fee.
I run about 90% on upgrades as a US plat, but I rarely make last-minute changes. IIRC, the only upgrades I missed last year were when I used the move-up to change to earlier flights. I even clear some of those, depending on the route. I do sometimes choose schedules for leisure travel on transcons to optimize my upgrade chances or cash in miles on routes I think might be a tough upgrade, otherwise I might miss more.
#872
Join Date: Jan 2013
Programs: AA ExPlat; Other Stuff
Posts: 121
Less competition usually isn't good for consumers
#873
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 49,017
Hell, it isn't like it happened when Horton was in charge. I consider it an omen, it disagrees with how I read the pattern of chicken bones I dropped in the sand, so we will have to see how it plays out.
#874
Join Date: Nov 2009
Programs: AA PLT, 60K "old miles"
Posts: 188
[QUOTE=AAExPlat;20289088]Astounding that there are EXPs who think $300 transcons are expensive, use fuel dumps liberally, and consider playing with their home address to get better promo coverage, and think $6k for EXP is too much.
And people here wonder why airlines are considering revenue floors as part of status requirements....[/QUOTE
What's a fuel dump?
And people here wonder why airlines are considering revenue floors as part of status requirements....[/QUOTE
What's a fuel dump?
#875
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: AA LT Plat, UA 1k/1mm+, National EE, IC Plat, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 2,605
[QUOTE=bubba198;20291446]
A way to remove carrier fuel surcharges from ticket pricing.
Astounding that there are EXPs who think $300 transcons are expensive, use fuel dumps liberally, and consider playing with their home address to get better promo coverage, and think $6k for EXP is too much.
And people here wonder why airlines are considering revenue floors as part of status requirements....[/QUOTE
What's a fuel dump?
And people here wonder why airlines are considering revenue floors as part of status requirements....[/QUOTE
What's a fuel dump?
#876
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
It's a complex method of ticket purchase where you can avoid the YQ/YR fuel surcharges, as some airlines mistakenly fail to add them to fares. I think there's a lot of info on these techniques in the mileage run forum.
I'm amazed that airlines haven't figured out a way to confirm that all surcharges have been paid and to deny boarding when they've not been paid.
I'm amazed that airlines haven't figured out a way to confirm that all surcharges have been paid and to deny boarding when they've not been paid.
#877
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SNA, LAX, PHL, NYC
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 663
Astounding that there are EXPs who think $300 transcons are expensive, use fuel dumps liberally, and consider playing with their home address to get better promo coverage, and think $6k for EXP is too much.
And people here wonder why airlines are considering revenue floors as part of status requirements....
And people here wonder why airlines are considering revenue floors as part of status requirements....
#879
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP, BA Silver, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton diamond, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 33,526
Astounding that there are EXPs who think $300 transcons are expensive, use fuel dumps liberally, and consider playing with their home address to get better promo coverage, and think $6k for EXP is too much.
And people here wonder why airlines are considering revenue floors as part of status requirements....
And people here wonder why airlines are considering revenue floors as part of status requirements....
Cheers.
*I use this term liberally to apply to myself as well. Of course, there are even lower levels, it seems
#880
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: Bonvoy Amb; AA EXP
Posts: 1,136
Couple of things:
- I do hope that US's policy of filling the F cabin far in advance doesn't end up as the standing policy. When I was a US flyer and wanted to buy F last minute, often flights were 'full' and couldn't be purchased. This obviously has an effect on being able to standby or deal with Irrops.
- I flew a UA redeye the other day SFO-BOS (I have been at least pondering a change back to UA from AA). Suffice it to say that it was not a flight that would compel a change: 1. No pillows for a redeye 2. WAY too many announcements (none of which was a reminder to shut the shades) and other noise 3. Lots of announcements about not putting jackets in the overhead and zero done about it. While not the airlines fault, it really felt like a rookie crowd in F that evening.
Not related to my general distaste for the flight was the hammered guy who swore at me for taking the overhead above his seat (I was in F, he in the first row of Y). He actually threw a little shoulder into me on his way by, which to me was way more comedy than threat. The icing on the cake was that after some disagreement with fellow passengers about overhead space he was asked to leave the plane. Good times.
- I do hope that US's policy of filling the F cabin far in advance doesn't end up as the standing policy. When I was a US flyer and wanted to buy F last minute, often flights were 'full' and couldn't be purchased. This obviously has an effect on being able to standby or deal with Irrops.
- I flew a UA redeye the other day SFO-BOS (I have been at least pondering a change back to UA from AA). Suffice it to say that it was not a flight that would compel a change: 1. No pillows for a redeye 2. WAY too many announcements (none of which was a reminder to shut the shades) and other noise 3. Lots of announcements about not putting jackets in the overhead and zero done about it. While not the airlines fault, it really felt like a rookie crowd in F that evening.
Not related to my general distaste for the flight was the hammered guy who swore at me for taking the overhead above his seat (I was in F, he in the first row of Y). He actually threw a little shoulder into me on his way by, which to me was way more comedy than threat. The icing on the cake was that after some disagreement with fellow passengers about overhead space he was asked to leave the plane. Good times.
#881
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Juan Capistrano, CA
Programs: Bonvoy Titanium, Hilton Diamond, AA 2.5 MM, United Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,460
#882
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 542
#883
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SNA, LAX, PHL, NYC
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 663
#884
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: BOS
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 7,710
Those extremely low rev EXPs are bottom feeding scum, not like those of us who spend $4-$6k a year.
#885
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: AA & DL / SPG & HGP
Posts: 1,723
Wait for AA's IT to fail and book 13 of these http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/milea...stt-150ai.html.
Those extremely low rev EXPs are bottom feeding scum, not like those of us who spend $4-$6k a year.
Those extremely low rev EXPs are bottom feeding scum, not like those of us who spend $4-$6k a year.
But, even if that MR is worth 4,000 miles (I didn't add it up), then one needs to do runs like that 25 times and at $150/ea that's still $6k. OK, say there's a DEQM and one does 12-13 of those in the say eight weeks DEQM period, that's still over $3k spend. So, again, how is $2k really possible (unless the answer is a MR and/or FD of greater mileage all done during a DEQM month or two)?