Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > All Nippon Airways | ANA Mileage Club
Reload this Page >

why is ANA frequently the cheapest option on my TPAC routes?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

why is ANA frequently the cheapest option on my TPAC routes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2013, 2:34 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 216
why is ANA frequently the cheapest option on my TPAC routes?

why is ANA frequently the cheapest option on my TPAC routes? I just don't get it... they have much better foor/service than US carriers, including their *A partner, United.(duh!)

dont' get me wrong, I love to pay less money for a superior product, but I just don't get how ANA can afford to do this...
MetricFlyer is offline  
Old Feb 28, 2013, 2:37 pm
  #2  
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Everywhere
Programs: UA GS 3MM, NH PLT
Posts: 761
For the vast majority of airlines, they charge more for flights that originate in the country where they operate relative to others.

The reason is really quite simple... for people living in Japan, they generally favor Japanese carriers. Vice versa the other way around.

The majority of people living in the U.S. would prefer flying United for familiarity's sake as well as frequent flier benefits.
KI-NRT is offline  
Old Feb 28, 2013, 5:12 pm
  #3  
Moderator, All Nippon Airways and Japan
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TYO
Programs: NH SFC (*G), JL JGP (OWE), AS MVP, WOH E, IHG SE
Posts: 3,908
Originally Posted by MetricFlyer
why is ANA frequently the cheapest option on my TPAC routes? I just don't get it... they have much better foor/service than US carriers, including their *A partner, United.(duh!)

dont' get me wrong, I love to pay less money for a superior product, but I just don't get how ANA can afford to do this...
That's funny -- ANA is frequently the most expensive option for me. It all depends on where you live. As KI-NRT said, airlines generally are more expensive on fares originating in their home market, and vice versa.

Also, NH has mostly unified their fare structure with UA on TPAC routes, so except for discount fare buckets you can generally use either carrier and the revenue is shared.
armagebedar is offline  
Old Feb 28, 2013, 7:10 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ORD, HKG
Programs: UA*G, AA Emerald, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt globalist
Posts: 10,272
Originally Posted by MetricFlyer
why is ANA frequently the cheapest option on my TPAC routes? I just don't get it... they have much better foor/service than US carriers, including their *A partner, United.(duh!)
May I ask what TPAC routes on NH are the cheapest ? And compare to ?
ORDnHKG is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2013, 1:50 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Asia
Programs: *gold, SPG Platinum, Amex Centurian, IHG Royal whatever, Emerald one world whatever
Posts: 106
have to remember that on the domestic route, ANA flies (and charges) one of the highest rates in the world (ppm). To find the TPAC the cheapest, I would be curious where you are flying from since the prices "should" be similar to UA etc....
daboogah is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2013, 2:11 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,835
I was very happy when i heard ANA was going to fly from Seattle.
Finally a decent star* carrier.

But, the prices that ANA charged going to Asia was just stupid high.
In some cases, it was over 30% more than competing carriers.
Ok, they had the new 787 then but still.
Also, the fares only earned 70% miles.

Out of SIN to the USA, i can also forget about ANA.
Their prices are simply way higher than others.

They have a good product yes, but ridiculously high pricing.

Domestic NRT to CTS, cheapest was $200+ on Jetstar.
ANA wanted $700+.
Really? A 1 hr+ flight.

If ANA simply charged 5 to 10% more, i would definitely take ANA.
I pay for my own flights so it is hard to justify paying 30% more for transpac.
HawaiiO is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2013, 2:56 am
  #7  
Moderator, All Nippon Airways and Japan
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TYO
Programs: NH SFC (*G), JL JGP (OWE), AS MVP, WOH E, IHG SE
Posts: 3,908
Originally Posted by HawaiiO
Domestic NRT to CTS, cheapest was $200+ on Jetstar.
ANA wanted $700+.
Really? A 1 hr+ flight.
You should have flown out of HND -- more flights and lower fares on NH. You can get as low as 21,000 JPY RT if you book in advance.

The domestic air market is not completely liberalized; add to that slot restrictions and high landing fees you have some really high fares in places.
armagebedar is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2013, 12:00 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: Free agent!
Posts: 1,426
Originally Posted by HawaiiO
Also, the fares only earned 70% miles.
Are you crediting to NH or another *A carrier? With UA MP, pretty much all fares earn 100% TPAC, even lower fares that don't earn a 100% when crediting to NH. Not sure about AC or US, though.
kevincrumbs is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2013, 9:30 pm
  #9  
LAX
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA; Philadelphia, PA
Programs: OZ Diamond
Posts: 6,133
Originally Posted by kevincrumbs
Are you crediting to NH or another *A carrier? With UA MP, pretty much all fares earn 100% TPAC, even lower fares that don't earn a 100% when crediting to NH. Not sure about AC or US, though.
If anyone wants to credit to US, most discounted Y tix on NH metal earn only 50% EQM/RDM.

LAX
LAX is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2013, 10:07 am
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 216
Originally Posted by LAX
If anyone wants to credit to US, most discounted Y tix on NH metal earn only 50% EQM/RDM.

LAX

who in their right mind would do that? (when crediting to UA on the same cheap fares will get 100% EQM/RDM?)

Unless they really want US miles, or soon-to-be AA miles?
MetricFlyer is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2013, 10:30 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ORD, HKG
Programs: UA*G, AA Emerald, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt globalist
Posts: 10,272
Originally Posted by MetricFlyer
who in their right mind would do that? (when crediting to UA on the same cheap fares will get 100% EQM/RDM?)

Unless they really want US miles, or soon-to-be AA miles?
That is only for TPAC routes because UA and NH has JV on these routes, any other routes if you fly NH and credit to UA you would still only earn 50% or 70%.

Btw, since you started this thread a few days ago, you still didn't say what TPAC route on NH being the cheapest, care to eloborate your claim ?
ORDnHKG is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2014, 6:04 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 514
Although it has been a year since this thread, I can say that for flights from CGK to GSO / RDU / CLT, NH / UA has been consistently the cheapest option lately (~$1800 r/t). I hardly ever travel anymore, so my choice is entirely price-driven. For a few hours, KE + B6 had an option to fly on an A380 through JFK for $1750, but I did not act quickly enough to get that for my once-every-other-year flight back to the US.

So far, I am looking forward to NH though, especially since I have never been to Japan (and even after the trip, will never have been outside NRT in Japan). Hopefully the layover will allow me enough time to buy some green tea Kit-Kats in a duty-free shop. Also, near SFO, I will get to grab a double-double at In-N-Out in Millbrae before the UA flight to RDU.
greenery-travel is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2014, 10:57 am
  #13  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: The City of Angels, CA
Programs: Nothing current
Posts: 392
UA has completely taken over pricing duties for NH out of US point of sale.
In the past (pre-JVs), the US carriers would fight it out with sale fares and other pricing wars and JL and NH would basically not get involved and maintain a higher price.

Now, though, NH is included in all of the sale fares that UA files, so that's why you often now see NH pricing that is just as low as the US carriers.

(I'm most frequently looking at LAX-TYO, which is one of the routes with highest competition. YMMV out of routes with fewer carriers flying them.)

-S
Sarfa33 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.