Comparing 767 (2-1-2) with 777 (2-3-2)
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Programs: UA 1K SPG Gold
Posts: 137
Comparing 767 (2-1-2) with 777 (2-3-2)
Howdy folks.... Just flew from BKK-NRT on an ANA 767, in the 2-1-2 business class. I have to say, among the least comfortable business classes I've flown in. Very hard to sleep. Seat angle was very far from 180 degrees. Awkward position of foot rest.
I'm supposed to continue on to the US on an ANA 777, configuration 2-3-2.
Are these any better? If not, frankly I just might cancel the US leg. It really messes me up to lose a night of sleep in an uncomfortable seat and takes me a while to recover. I have found it affects me for a week or two after the flight, the difference between a comfortable seat (I.e., lay-flat united 747s) and uncomfortable seat (i.e., the ANA 767).
If anyone who has a basis for comparison of these two seat types could let me know their impression, would be helpful. Thanks!
I'm supposed to continue on to the US on an ANA 777, configuration 2-3-2.
Are these any better? If not, frankly I just might cancel the US leg. It really messes me up to lose a night of sleep in an uncomfortable seat and takes me a while to recover. I have found it affects me for a week or two after the flight, the difference between a comfortable seat (I.e., lay-flat united 747s) and uncomfortable seat (i.e., the ANA 767).
If anyone who has a basis for comparison of these two seat types could let me know their impression, would be helpful. Thanks!
#4
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: HNL, TYO, & Many Places in the Sky
Programs: Too Many
Posts: 397
IMHO, the Business seat on the 77W is much better for sleeping than the 767. Still I prefer the UA seat even more for sleeping. But, if you were switch to UA, you give up the better Soft Product that you get on NH. I would give the NH 77W a try and see how you like it.
#5
Moderator, All Nippon Airways and Japan
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TYO
Programs: NH SFC (*G), JL JGP (OWE), AS MVP, WOH E, IHG SE
Posts: 3,908
Keep in mind that the 77W with new seats is only on the JFK route; all of the other routes have the older lie-flat seats. Still, both are better than the regional 767 seats.
#6
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: IAH
Programs: Continental Gold, HH Diamond, Star Alliance Gold
Posts: 23
Quick question on ANA 767 and 777- both the older versions. I have chosen seats in the first row of C -row 3. On some planes being in the bulkhead or first row of section means less leg room- is that the case here? I can't find diagrams of these flights on Seatguru.
Thanks.
Thanks.
#7
Moderator, All Nippon Airways and Japan
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TYO
Programs: NH SFC (*G), JL JGP (OWE), AS MVP, WOH E, IHG SE
Posts: 3,908
I've flown in row 1 on the intra-Asia 767(-300ER) and there seemed to be slightly more space than the other, non-bulkhead rows.
#8
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ORD & MKE
Programs: Airlines: UA-CO, NH, AA, and DL Hotels: SPG, Accor, PC, and Marriott
Posts: 1,827
Still, as far as *A goes (CA aside), NH has one of the worst Intra-Asia C seats. I've kept that to 744's and 772's; unfortunately NH doesn't use those (much) on Intra-Asia flights any more.