Just Short of Elite - How to Keep Your Status
#136
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: On a plane or a beach
Programs: Yes
Posts: 3,152
Originally Posted by TheDudeAbides;[url=tel:34567759
34567759]OK. Fair enough. I suspect AS disagrees, but perhaps not. I believe that the purpose of the FFP in general is to incentivize behavior from customers that the airline finds valuable. If AS prefers the former to the latter, then so be it, but I doubt it. I also believe that if your spend is high enough, you will get exceptions that those with lower spend do not. Of course, YMMV.
#137
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clinging to the edifices of a decadent past from the biggest city in America nobody really cares about.
Programs: (ಠ_ಠ)
Posts: 9,077
Thank you all for your replies.
Thanks; I think perhaps the way forward here is to just simply reach out to AS once the dust settles when I'm actually short. Assuming all goes to plan (hah!), I think I'll be short by less than 500eqms but who knows what'll happen between now and then...bonus EQM promo, plans changing, etc.
Fair. What makes a status worthwhile is if the carrier defends it.
To be fair, I'd argue AS is already on a de facto revenue program by linking EQM bonuses to higher fare classes. True, it may be an indirect link - versus the far more vulgar direct revenue link adopted by AS's peers - but a link nonetheless.
Would caveat the purpose of the FFP is to generate revenue/profit; to that end, strategic exceptions probably make more sense than rigid adherence to the rules.
I note AS's CASM is$10.47 ¢10.47 (arguably less, but opting to using the highest number) via their FY-2021 10K. A quick back-of-the-napkin calculation suggests an average RASM of ~$0.17 from me for AS travel in 2022.
I certainly do not claim to be AS's most profitable customer but would assume to be a profitable customer - at least for 2022 - for the carrier.
Thanks; I think perhaps the way forward here is to just simply reach out to AS once the dust settles when I'm actually short. Assuming all goes to plan (hah!), I think I'll be short by less than 500eqms but who knows what'll happen between now and then...bonus EQM promo, plans changing, etc.
Would caveat the purpose of the FFP is to generate revenue/profit; to that end, strategic exceptions probably make more sense than rigid adherence to the rules.
I note AS's CASM is
I certainly do not claim to be AS's most profitable customer but would assume to be a profitable customer - at least for 2022 - for the carrier.
Last edited by J.Edward; Sep 3, 2022 at 12:04 pm Reason: $10.47 → ¢10.47 - thanks john012001
#138
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, Or USA
Posts: 1,800
Thank you all for your replies.
Thanks; I think perhaps the way forward here is to just simply reach out to AS once the dust settles when I'm actually short. Assuming all goes to plan (hah!), I think I'll be short by less than 500eqms but who knows what'll happen between now and then...bonus EQM promo, plans changing, etc.
Fair. What makes a status worthwhile is if the carrier defends it.
To be fair, I'd argue AS is already on a de facto revenue program by linking EQM bonuses to higher fare classes. True, it may be an indirect link - versus the far more vulgar direct revenue link adopted by AS's peers - but a link nonetheless.
Would caveat the purpose of the FFP is to generate revenue/profit; to that end, strategic exceptions probably make more sense than rigid adherence to the rules.
I note AS's CASM is $10.47 (arguably less, but opting to using the highest number) via their FY-2021 10K. A quick back-of-the-napkin calculation suggests an average RASM of ~$0.17 from me for AS travel in 2022.
I certainly do not claim to be AS's most profitable customer but would assume to be a profitable customer - at least for 2022 - for the carrier.
Thanks; I think perhaps the way forward here is to just simply reach out to AS once the dust settles when I'm actually short. Assuming all goes to plan (hah!), I think I'll be short by less than 500eqms but who knows what'll happen between now and then...bonus EQM promo, plans changing, etc.
Fair. What makes a status worthwhile is if the carrier defends it.
To be fair, I'd argue AS is already on a de facto revenue program by linking EQM bonuses to higher fare classes. True, it may be an indirect link - versus the far more vulgar direct revenue link adopted by AS's peers - but a link nonetheless.
Would caveat the purpose of the FFP is to generate revenue/profit; to that end, strategic exceptions probably make more sense than rigid adherence to the rules.
I note AS's CASM is $10.47 (arguably less, but opting to using the highest number) via their FY-2021 10K. A quick back-of-the-napkin calculation suggests an average RASM of ~$0.17 from me for AS travel in 2022.
I certainly do not claim to be AS's most profitable customer but would assume to be a profitable customer - at least for 2022 - for the carrier.
Last edited by dayone; Sep 2, 2022 at 11:03 pm Reason: Deleted quoted image for readability.
#139
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clinging to the edifices of a decadent past from the biggest city in America nobody really cares about.
Programs: (ಠ_ಠ)
Posts: 9,077
#140
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Diego, Ca
Programs: AA 2MM LT PLT; AS MVP Gold75k; HHonors Diamond; IHG PLT
Posts: 3,502
AS was extremely generous extending status, offering EQM promotions during the pandemic, at some point has to restore the value of its award program, elite status. In my case, I have greatly enjoyed, taken full advantage of 75k status over the past year, when I otherwise would have earned MVPG. If AS considers revenue as a consideration for elite status, then it should be offered as an alternative to EQM thresholds.
Now that AS is officially part of OW, I would not expect AA to look too kindly on AS giving out status to those that do not qualify. I am well aware that AA often plays fast and loose with status - as a tool to poach frequent flyers from other carriers.
All things considered, I consider MP to be the most generous of all major carriers - lowest elite thresholds, upgrades on award travel, no status revenue requirements - would like to AS thin out the elite heard, increase upgrade opportunities for those of us that earn it.
Now that AS is officially part of OW, I would not expect AA to look too kindly on AS giving out status to those that do not qualify. I am well aware that AA often plays fast and loose with status - as a tool to poach frequent flyers from other carriers.
All things considered, I consider MP to be the most generous of all major carriers - lowest elite thresholds, upgrades on award travel, no status revenue requirements - would like to AS thin out the elite heard, increase upgrade opportunities for those of us that earn it.
#141
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: SFO
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100k, UA Silver, AC P25k, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 863
AS was extremely generous extending status, offering EQM promotions during the pandemic, at some point has to restore the value of its award program, elite status. In my case, I have greatly enjoyed, taken full advantage of 75k status over the past year, when I otherwise would have earned MVPG. If AS considers revenue as a consideration for elite status, then it should be offered as an alternative to EQM thresholds.
Now that AS is officially part of OW, I would not expect AA to look too kindly on AS giving out status to those that do not qualify. I am well aware that AA often plays fast and loose with status - as a tool to poach frequent flyers from other carriers.
All things considered, I consider MP to be the most generous of all major carriers - lowest elite thresholds, upgrades on award travel, no status revenue requirements - would like to AS thin out the elite heard, increase upgrade opportunities for those of us that earn it.
Now that AS is officially part of OW, I would not expect AA to look too kindly on AS giving out status to those that do not qualify. I am well aware that AA often plays fast and loose with status - as a tool to poach frequent flyers from other carriers.
All things considered, I consider MP to be the most generous of all major carriers - lowest elite thresholds, upgrades on award travel, no status revenue requirements - would like to AS thin out the elite heard, increase upgrade opportunities for those of us that earn it.
The gravy train has to stop - and there are costs to extensions that will allow more devaluations later (i.e. like increased inflation in the whole economy due to excessive free money with no productivity) of the programs....its basic economics.
I will certainly go from the above statuses to AS 100k and UA silver - unless there are future easy promos for WN extension or good will soft landings.....but thats a bonus and wont be upset if it doesnt happen. After all upgrades will be just that much more generous with 100k status and a thining of the elite ranks that havent earned it.
#142
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS MVP100K, Hilton Diamond, IHG Gold
Posts: 3,215
Sorry if this is an answer I should know, but I thought after joining OW they got rid of the AS segments required? I have 6 AS segments and it says I need another 6 to hit 75k? It also says I need 18,500 miles to hit 75k.
Do I need the AS segments AND the 18,500 miles. Or do I just need one of them? I have to go to Africa for six months for my job starting in October. I’m not sure if I’m close enough or it’s worth it to shoot for 75k at this juncture? Unless it’s feasible and cheap enough to do within the next few weeks on some special routes? However I don’t see much of a difference between Gold and 75k anymore unless I am missing something.
Do I need the AS segments AND the 18,500 miles. Or do I just need one of them? I have to go to Africa for six months for my job starting in October. I’m not sure if I’m close enough or it’s worth it to shoot for 75k at this juncture? Unless it’s feasible and cheap enough to do within the next few weeks on some special routes? However I don’t see much of a difference between Gold and 75k anymore unless I am missing something.
#143
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: SFO
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100k, UA Silver, AC P25k, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 863
Sorry if this is an answer I should know, but I thought after joining OW they got rid of the AS segments required? I have 6 AS segments and it says I need another 6 to hit 75k? It also says I need 18,500 miles to hit 75k.
Do I need the AS segments AND the 18,500 miles. Or do I just need one of them? I have to go to Africa for six months for my job starting in October. I’m not sure if I’m close enough or it’s worth it to shoot for 75k at this juncture? Unless it’s feasible and cheap enough to do within the next few weeks on some special routes? However I don’t see much of a difference between Gold and 75k anymore unless I am missing something.
Do I need the AS segments AND the 18,500 miles. Or do I just need one of them? I have to go to Africa for six months for my job starting in October. I’m not sure if I’m close enough or it’s worth it to shoot for 75k at this juncture? Unless it’s feasible and cheap enough to do within the next few weeks on some special routes? However I don’t see much of a difference between Gold and 75k anymore unless I am missing something.
75k is a big difference to gold.
50k bonus.
premium selection at booking.
upgrades percentages go up significantly.
#144
Join Date: Oct 2020
Programs: AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 154
Sorry if this is an answer I should know, but I thought after joining OW they got rid of the AS segments required? I have 6 AS segments and it says I need another 6 to hit 75k? It also says I need 18,500 miles to hit 75k.
Do I need the AS segments AND the 18,500 miles. Or do I just need one of them? I have to go to Africa for six months for my job starting in October. I’m not sure if I’m close enough or it’s worth it to shoot for 75k at this juncture? Unless it’s feasible and cheap enough to do within the next few weeks on some special routes? However I don’t see much of a difference between Gold and 75k anymore unless I am missing something.
Do I need the AS segments AND the 18,500 miles. Or do I just need one of them? I have to go to Africa for six months for my job starting in October. I’m not sure if I’m close enough or it’s worth it to shoot for 75k at this juncture? Unless it’s feasible and cheap enough to do within the next few weeks on some special routes? However I don’t see much of a difference between Gold and 75k anymore unless I am missing something.
#145
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
Alternatively, you can qualify for MVPG75K by flying 90 segments providing that at least 12 of those segments are marketed & operated by AS.
Similarly,
MVP, 20K EQMs & 2 AS segments or 30 segments of which 2 must be AS.
MVPG, 40K EQMs & 4 AS segments or 60 segments of which 4 must be AS.
MVPG100K, 100K EQMs & 24 AS segments or 140 segments of which 24 must be AS.
James
#147
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Bay Area, California
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold (ex-75K), Bonvoy Titanium, Recovering United 1K
Posts: 338
#148
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS MVP100K, Hilton Diamond, IHG Gold
Posts: 3,215
I’d be “done” because I would get to 12 AS segments? And 12 AS segments gets you 75K? I’m still short 18,500 miles, so I wouldn’t be done, right?
#149
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: On a plane or a beach
Programs: Yes
Posts: 3,152
Originally Posted by NWplatinum;[url=tel:34600489
34600489]I’d be “done” because I would get to 12 AS segments? And 12 AS segments gets you 75K? I’m still short 18,500 miles, so I wouldn’t be done, right?
#150
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS MVP100K, Hilton Diamond, IHG Gold
Posts: 3,215
I’ll get 2700 miles from my flight Saturday, but I don’t think I can fly 18,500 miles within a few weeks time unfortunately by the time I have to go to Africa for my job October 5th. So I guess it’s gold for me.