AS Changes How You Earn Elite Status With Partners
TPG – https://thepointsguy.com/news/alaska...with-partners/
AS – https://www.alaskaair.com/content/mi...rship-benefits Takeaways for 2021:
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...a283c0c1fa.png |
That's a huge drop in required flying to get status from partners. Curious to see how it will play out next year.
|
Darn, was hoping to see the opposite happen. Hopefully, partner-earning is slashed. I'd like to see an MVPG90K or the likes introduced now more than ever, that must be attained solely through AS flying.
|
I think the required AS segments is great, especially as a BOS based flyer :-)
|
Originally Posted by HangryDad
(Post 32876380)
That's a huge drop in required flying to get status from partners. Curious to see how it will play out next year.
|
Correct me if wrong, but doesn’t this change in partner earning benefits devalue loyalty to AS? I fly AS exclusively when I am able so as to support a company I value.
|
Originally Posted by damnyourefine
(Post 32876433)
Correct me if wrong, but doesn’t this change in partner earning benefits devalue loyalty to AS? I fly AS exclusively when I am able so as to support a company I value.
|
Originally Posted by damnyourefine
(Post 32876433)
Correct me if wrong, but doesn’t this change in partner earning benefits devalue loyalty to AS? I fly AS exclusively when I am able so as to support a company I value.
|
Are the rates for earning on partners staying the same? If so, earning AD EQM by flying AA coach is presently not exactly great so it seems like it should sweeten the deal on flying AA with your AS FF# without making it THAT much easier to actually hit the next tier up.
Also remember that a lot of people are likely to still have condensed travel schedules this year, i.e. not start flying again until the second half of the year. I know I'm probably in that group unless the COVID vaccine timeline somehow rapidly accelerates. |
Also for premium tickets it is still better to try and find AS flights vs AA as you'd get 75% bonus on AS vs. 50% (on discounted premium anyway).
|
Originally Posted by damnyourefine
(Post 32876433)
Correct me if wrong, but doesn’t this change in partner earning benefits devalue loyalty to AS? I fly AS exclusively when I am able so as to support a company I value.
|
Good news unless the partner earning changes too.
|
I think the accrual rates (both EQM and RDM) will make it unenticing to be a heavy flier on partner airlines while crediting to AS. If AS credits AA flights at 25%, that 75K threshold for G75K status would be difficult at best to achieve. I read this as a benefit of OW membership for when you need that random partner flight, but not much more. It also seems to me that the AS statisticians and analysts did the math and found there would be negligible impact on AS profits. The other thing may be pressure from OW to reconfigure status thresholds. AS really had two parameters by which they could control elite membership numbers (i.e., 1 - thresholds, 2 - earning rates). This now brings it to just a single parameter (earning rates). I like this because they can still control the impact of partner earnings on elite qualifications, while simplifying the IT that does all the math in the background. I for one will not be surprised to see reductions in partner earning rates in future years.
|
Does this include any AA flights or only those that can be booked through AS website?
|
Originally Posted by WillTravel4Food
(Post 32876656)
I think the accrual rates (both EQM and RDM) will make it unenticing to be a heavy flier on partner airlines while crediting to AS. If AS credits AA flights at 25%, that 75K threshold for G75K status would be difficult at best to achieve. I read this as a benefit of OW membership for when you need that random partner flight, but not much more. It also seems to me that the AS statisticians and analysts did the math and found there would be negligible impact on AS profits. The other thing may be pressure from OW to reconfigure status thresholds. AS really had two parameters by which they could control elite membership numbers (i.e., 1 - thresholds, 2 - earning rates). This now brings it to just a single parameter (earning rates). I like this because they can still control the impact of partner earnings on elite qualifications, while simplifying the IT that does all the math in the background. I for one will not be surprised to see reductions in partner earning rates in future years.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:03 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.