Originally Posted by scubadu
(Post 32583706)
Actually, every thread, across almost every FT forum, related to masks eventually gets locked (almost w/o exception)
I'm not sure why people feel compelled to keep starting new ones. At this point, pretty much everyone knows the rules (whether or not they like or agree with them). People just shout at each other, they say the same things over and over, no hearts or minds are ever changed and then it gets locked. Then we do it again a few days later... Regards |
Great job Alaska, you just joined the ranks of Delta, United, American, and Southwest, only weeks later.
|
Originally Posted by Tribeca725
(Post 32583767)
age 2 or older? I’ve yet to meet the two year old who will keep a mask on for more than five minutes. That is a lower threshold than others right which are at least three or older? BA is like 11 or r]older I think. That’s a little high but two is way too low.
Wear a mask. |
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
(Post 32584178)
So what happens if you eat and drink the whole flight?
|
I also support Alaska's policy of wearing masks. I too have become much more comfortable wearing a mask all day, and even forgetting to take it off when I return to my car. Part of it is that Ive found a style that I like, and is comfy enough to wear all day (we now have a multitude of both disposable and washable masks in our house) I liked the idea of a face shield when eating or drinking, that seems to be a good way to handle eating and drinking while on a. plane and think that perhaps using a face shield should be encouraged in the policies but as a suggestion not a mandate. Losing one person in the USA every 80 seconds is too high of a cost if we could find a way to stop the spread and do that while managing a semblance of business as normal. When I am on a plane, the person I interact with the most is the FA, but that same FA has to interact with all of the passengers in the cabin where I am sitting, whether or not the passenger is an asymptomatic carrier or not. I would hope we all would do what we can to lessen the risk to the crews that get us to where we need or want to be safely.
|
Originally Posted by TravelingZoomer
(Post 32583131)
Great. If you can’t wear a mask for “valid medical reasons” (still haven’t found any reputable sources that someone can’t wear a mask but whatever), you shouldn’t be flying in a pandemic. Some decisions are best made outside the hands of the individual.
The faster we curb the spread the faster we can redeem miles on AS long haul partners FFS In this case I have no problem with private businesses enforcing a requirement for masks (although if we are honest with ourselves the airlines are doing this for liability protection and no other reason). My family and I will be abiding by this private business mandate and will be wearing masks on our upcoming AS flights and then summarily removing them the second we cross through the airport exit to the outdoors. Others will choose to keep them on all the way through to their rental car (and including while they drive) and that is okay. Both positions should be supported with graciousness. |
Originally Posted by DuckFlyer
(Post 32586277)
I would state this exactly the opposite. Individuals are ALWAYS the ones who should make decisions for themselves and for their family, not the government. This wonderful country was founded on rugged individualism.
In this case I have no problem with private businesses enforcing a requirement for masks (although if we are honest with ourselves the airlines are doing this for liability protection and no other reason). My family and I will be abiding by this private business mandate and will be wearing masks on our upcoming AS flights and then summarily removing them the second we cross through the airport exit to the outdoors. Others will choose to keep them on all the way through to their rental car (and including while they drive) and that is okay. Both positions should be supported with graciousness. In a situation concerning public health, what you're glorifying as "rugged individualism" is simply self centered disregard for others because it is personally inconvenient. It's about as "rugged" as peeing in a public pool because it's too inconvenient to get to the washroom. |
Originally Posted by DuckFlyer
(Post 32586277)
I would state this exactly the opposite. Individuals are ALWAYS the ones who should make decisions for themselves and for their family, not the government. This wonderful country was founded on rugged individualism.
|
Originally Posted by DuckFlyer
(Post 32586277)
I would state this exactly the opposite. Individuals are ALWAYS the ones who should make decisions for themselves and for their family, not the government. This wonderful country was founded on rugged individualism.
In this case I have no problem with private businesses enforcing a requirement for masks (although if we are honest with ourselves the airlines are doing this for liability protection and no other reason). My family and I will be abiding by this private business mandate and will be wearing masks on our upcoming AS flights and then summarily removing them the second we cross through the airport exit to the outdoors. Others will choose to keep them on all the way through to their rental car (and including while they drive) and that is okay. Both positions should be supported with graciousness. Although I’m not sure what you’re debating here. The reason you’d wear a mask is because of the forced mandate, government, business or otherwise. Hence the need for a mandate, because some individuals are too selfish and shortsighted to understand science and the greater good. This is not a moral argument. Mandates work. Masks work. I don’t care why businesses decided to enforce one, and they didn’t need to if the government were competent. The faster this pandemic ends the faster we can go on with our lives. |
Originally Posted by TravelingZoomer
(Post 32586438)
Spare me the hogwash. This country was founded on stolen land on, depending on the backs of enslaved involuntary immigrants. I digress.
Although I’m not sure what you’re debating here. The reason you’d wear a mask is because of the forced mandate, government, business or otherwise. Hence the need for a mandate, because some individuals are too selfish and shortsighted to understand science and the greater good. This is not a moral argument. Mandates work. Masks work. I don’t care why businesses decided to enforce one, and they didn’t need to if the government were competent. The faster this pandemic ends the faster we can go on with our lives. Alaska Airlines and other US airlines are not mandating masks because they are concerned about the spread of COVID, they are doing it to prevent the spread of frivolous litigiousness. For me, I can respect the private mandate for that reason, and will happily comply to help protect one of our nation's most critical industries from financial insolvency. |
Originally Posted by DuckFlyer
(Post 32586523)
The science is certainly not settled. Thankfully Sweden has shown us that herd immunity and no mask requirement renders COVID about as dangerous as an above average flu season.
Alaska Airlines and other US airlines are not mandating masks because they are concerned about the spread of COVID, they are doing it to prevent the spread of frivolous litigiousness. For me, I can respect the private mandate for that reason, and will happily comply to help protect one of our nation's most critical industries from financial insolvency. |
Originally Posted by DuckFlyer
(Post 32586523)
The science is certainly not settled. Thankfully Sweden has shown us that herd immunity and no mask requirement renders COVID about as dangerous as an above average flu season.
Alaska Airlines and other US airlines are not mandating masks because they are concerned about the spread of COVID, they are doing it to prevent the spread of frivolous litigiousness. For me, I can respect the private mandate for that reason, and will happily comply to help protect one of our nation's most critical industries from financial insolvency. |
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
(Post 32586534)
I cannot speak for "other US airlines" but I believe that upper management at AS has a strong desire to keep its workforce healthy and alive, and not just for profit. This belief is based upon actual repeated human interaction with upper management in the actual (not airline lounge) board room.
As an aside, here's my Mask Management Home Storage System (MMHSS!) as a suggestion for those who find themselves inundated with a mask inventory that grows with each passing day! https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...9b57e50c96.jpg |
Originally Posted by DuckFlyer
(Post 32586523)
The science is certainly not settled. Thankfully Sweden has shown us that herd immunity and no mask requirement renders COVID about as dangerous as an above average flu season.
Alaska Airlines and other US airlines are not mandating masks because they are concerned about the spread of COVID, they are doing it to prevent the spread of frivolous litigiousness. For me, I can respect the private mandate for that reason, and will happily comply to help protect one of our nation's most critical industries from financial insolvency. But what I find more interesting is your apparent willingness to inconvenience yourself in a minor way for big business dividends, but apparently not, unless forced, for grandmas being able to have their families near them when they die. If you die with Covid, you die with a nurse at your bedside, if you're lucky. I find that decision by anti-maskers really cruel. It seems to me that wearing a mask is the least we who are healthy can do for the weaker among us. You seem to want to wear one for the benefit of the already powerful. |
Originally Posted by NoLaGent
(Post 32586596)
I agree completely and AS has their (their employees, their customers, etc.) best interests at heart, in this regard.
As an aside, here's my Mask Management Home Storage System (MMHSS!) as a suggestion for those who find themselves inundated with a mask inventory that grows with each passing day! https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...9b57e50c96.jpg |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:42 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.