QX headed back to Alaska
Only this time with E175's.
Looks like ANC-FAI/AKN/DLG to begin with; curious if they will also use it on SEA-ANC to rotate in and out of the state. https://investor.alaskaair.com/news-...-alaska-flying |
Could this plane be used on the milk run SEA-KTN-WRG-PSG-JNU-YAK-CDV-ANC? Or is that so cargo-heavy that they require 737 service?
|
Originally Posted by bmvaughn
(Post 32477266)
Could this plane be used on the milk run SEA-KTN-WRG-PSG-JNU-YAK-CDV-ANC? Or is that so cargo-heavy that they require 737 service?
This feels like a redux of the Q400 experiment, which was mostly about getting 737’s off ANC-FAI. Except the 175 is vastly superior from a passenger perspective. Wouldn’t be surprised if ADQ gets the E175 eventually, too. |
Originally Posted by Chugach
(Post 32477221)
Only this time with E175's.
Looks like ANC-FAI/AKN/DLG to begin with; curious if they will also use it on SEA-ANC to rotate in and out of the state. https://investor.alaskaair.com/news-...-alaska-flying |
Looks like E-175's will start ANC-SEA route
Saw this on ADN today about E-175's fulfilling some ANC-SEA flights. https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/2020...-state-routes/
|
Originally Posted by BOB W
(Post 32477723)
You had me scared for a minute with flashbacks of the disastrous Q400 launch and ultimate failure. Having been on flights that were downright scary, I was about to give up on this new experiment. The E175's make better sense and I suspect AS is repurposing them now that RAVN is out of the picture (and Covid-19 freeing up aircraft_. Time will tell how it goes but I wish AS success!
|
Excited to see what new routes AS offers ^
|
Originally Posted by LGACIC
(Post 32480137)
Okay, off topic, but were the Q400s really that bad in AK? I mean, I hate the plane in general, but how were they scary to fly there? I've never much more than ordinary turbulence between ANC and FAI.
|
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 32480454)
Excited to see what new routes AS offers ^
|
Originally Posted by LGACIC
(Post 32480137)
Okay, off topic, but were the Q400s really that bad in AK? I mean, I hate the plane in general, but how were they scary to fly there? I've never much more than ordinary turbulence between ANC and FAI.
|
Originally Posted by BOB W
(Post 32480666)
The Q400's did not take well to the cold weather in Alaska. I was on a flight ANC-FAI in the winter that was beyond scary. At altitude over Denali, the engines were surging, then almost cutting out, then surging again, over and over again. It seemed that the pilots were struggling to keep them running. When we landed in FAI, the return flight was cancelled. The plane simply does not work well in cold climates. I find this weird since at altitude the flight is in extreme cold, but they have all been moved to warmer routes...
|
Originally Posted by BOB W
(Post 32480666)
The Q400's did not take well to the cold weather in Alaska. I was on a flight ANC-FAI in the winter that was beyond scary. At altitude over Denali, the engines were surging, then almost cutting out, then surging again, over and over again. It seemed that the pilots were struggling to keep them running. When we landed in FAI, the return flight was cancelled. The plane simply does not work well in cold climates. I find this weird since at altitude the flight is in extreme cold, but they have all been moved to warmer routes...
|
Originally Posted by AKLifetimeFlyer
(Post 32482436)
Interesting, seeing that ConocoPhillips is using Q400's to fly into Kuparuk now.
|
Found the first E175 flight in Alaska...flight 2020, ANC-AKN-DLG-ANC daily.
Nothing for ANC-FAI/SEA yet. |
Originally Posted by Chugach
(Post 32485439)
Found the first E175 flight in Alaska...flight 2020, ANC-AKN-DLG-ANC daily.
Nothing for ANC-FAI/SEA yet. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:44 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.