Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

AA Partnership Effectively Ending 1 March 2020

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AA Partnership Effectively Ending 1 March 2020

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2019, 11:12 am
  #61  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: B6 Mosaic, Bonvoy LT Titanium (x SPG LT), IHG Spire, UA Silver
Posts: 5,847
Originally Posted by isaac.chambers
If the C-suites of AS/B6 are looking on how to stay relevant.....an obvious merger or extensive partnership would be needed. I would suspect that perhaps a full partnership is better since both C-suites have an affinity to thier respective airline identities.
How exactly would this help B6? They have many, many planes coming in the next few years and will be expanding to Europe and beyond with their own aircraft. AS doesn't really bring anything of value to them--especially as more gates open up in B6's new SFO terminal and LAX builds out more gates in the future as well. AS has already been cutting routes that overlap with B6 given AS's weak product. Why would they want to go through the headache for very little benefit?
sfozrhfco is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 11:16 am
  #62  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,752
You know, like most in west coast, in particular SFO based flyers, I was horrified with AS buying out VX, and immediately sought to diversify with other carriers assuming this BO was going to be bad for me. Now, I couldn't be happier! It's been the best FF program I've ever experienced, and my only regret is that I hadn't found it sooner. I never realized how right when a Poster (forgot his/her handle) observed that AS is like the SPG of airlines.

AA? Well, let's just say I don't even really care about the great Hyatt promo they're offering me, because it's just not worth it to turn down the AS bonus miles.
Visconti is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 11:18 am
  #63  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,629
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
I’m so old I can remember when AA and B6 had a partnership. Losing that partnership really doomed B6, didn’t it?
I'm so old, I can remember when AS and AA had the original codeshare type agreement ca. 1980s.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 11:21 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,837
Originally Posted by Visconti
You know, like most in west coast, in particular SFO based flyers, I was horrified with AS buying out VX, and immediately sought to diversify with other carriers assuming this BO was going to be bad for me. Now, I couldn't be happier! It's been the best FF program I've ever experienced, and my only regret is that I hadn't found it sooner. I never realized how right when a Poster (forgot his/her handle) observed that AS is like the SPG of airlines.

AA? Well, let's just say I don't even really care about the great Hyatt promo they're offering me, because it's just not worth it to turn down the AS bonus miles.

And there's the reason Alaska gets away with all the program downgrades - they suck less than the competition. Those of us who are Mileage Plan veterans remember the glory days...
MSPeconomist likes this.
flytoeat is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 11:26 am
  #65  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,752
Originally Posted by flytoeat
And there's the reason Alaska gets away with all the program downgrades - they suck less than the competition. Those of us who are Mileage Plan veterans remember the glory days...
Ignorance is bliss, as they say. During the "glory days," frequent travel wasn't required for me, and when it was, I had F/J provided. I didn't even care about the miles and had no idea how to use them. If only I had found FT in 2000!
Visconti is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 11:30 am
  #66  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVPG 75K, BA Silver, AC, AF/KL, AV, VS | Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott
Posts: 459
I'll have to change up my TATL strategy starting today, I guess. I've been flying AA instead of BA due to the better J seats but if BA keeps rolling out their newer product on more routes other than just JFK then that should be okay. Otherwise, if I'm "forced" to fly with AA then I'll just credit to BA.
missamo80 likes this.
TEDisgone is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 11:30 am
  #67  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: Alaska Airlines
Posts: 659
Not surprising, but disappointing. Particularly the loss of international EQM earning opportunities... that was pretty much the only reason I've been using American lately since the US priced codeshare pricing always seems to be bonkers.

As an Alaska Lounge member, makes me worried about our lounge network as well. If we lose AC access, they absolutely need to find a new partner. The AS lounge's just aren't plentiful enough.

They can spin it all they want that they think they're one of the "big boys" and don't need a US based partners... but there's plenty of cities I cannot get to on AS. But more than that, over the past several years, they've gone from having an assortment of world-class redemption partners to now having and odd assortment random carriers that, it seems like, we can't redeem on half of them.
nearlysober is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 11:38 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: 6km East of EPAYE
Programs: UA Silver, AA Platinum, AS & DL GM Marriott TE, Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,582
No more award flights with AS miles Oh no. There goes using my stash for annual family CLT-ROC trips
Madone59 is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 11:39 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,752
Originally Posted by nearlysober
They can spin it all they want that they think they're one of the "big boys" and don't need a US based partners... but there's plenty of cities I cannot get to on AS.
Granted, pure speculation here, but perhaps AS revenue management is assuming these "plenty of cities" aren't all that significant to their bottom line?
Visconti is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 11:45 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Programs: AS MVPG75K / HIlton Diamond
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by Robert
Received an email from Alaska a short time ago announcing the partnership changes. One interesting piece of information in the email:



(Bolding Mine)Nearly 90% of the trips our members redeemed on American are to destinations that continue to be served by Alaska or our other global partners.
That MIGHT be true... but a lot of the time it is the difference between "Via Seattle and 3 hour layover on AS metal, 10 hours total routing" vs "3 Hour direct via AA"

Last edited by rayfound; Oct 2, 2019 at 11:46 am Reason: quote missed
rayfound is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 12:06 pm
  #71  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,387
Originally Posted by nearlysober
They can spin it all they want that they think they're one of the "big boys" and don't need a US based partners... but there's plenty of cities I cannot get to on AS. But more than that, over the past several years, they've gone from having an assortment of world-class redemption partners to now having and odd assortment random carriers that, it seems like, we can't redeem on half of them.
Plenty of cities you couldn't get to on WN when they were a 330+ plane airline and not a 750+ plane airline like now. They still have zero, count 'em, zero partners. There are still a lot of airports you can't fly to on WN, including MIA, JFK, soon to include EWR, in fact there are entire states you can't fly to on WN. They seem to be doing slightly better than "5 minutes from filing for Chapter 11".
84fiero likes this.
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 12:23 pm
  #72  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,629
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
Plenty of cities you couldn't get to on WN when they were a 330+ plane airline and not a 750+ plane airline like now. They still have zero, count 'em, zero partners. There are still a lot of airports you can't fly to on WN, including MIA, JFK, soon to include EWR, in fact there are entire states you can't fly to on WN. They seem to be doing slightly better than "5 minutes from filing for Chapter 11".
True as that may be, my patronage of WN was never based upon the world of partners they advertised.

AS' marketing strategy was (pretty much) "If we can't take you there, one of our partners can, to either earn or burn your MP miles."
BearX220 and kevincrumbs like this.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 12:25 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SFO, mostly
Posts: 2,204
Although currently based in ORD, I have been avoiding AA since April because of their chronic reliability issues. Things appear to be slowly getting better, but I'm not sure I will be back on AA metal any time soon. The ability to redeem Int'l awards on AA was nice, but avail had been so limited of late that it never was of any use to me.

I do think an AS/B6 partnership would make sense in terms of giving B6 a much better west coast connections and AS much better east coast connections. There isn't much overlap in route network outside of BOS and JFK transcons.
sltlyamusd is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 12:34 pm
  #74  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,329
Too bad. This will likely result in a significant decrease in the value of AS miles for domestic travel. The only time I've redeemed them for > 2cpm was when there was an AA leg.
RAD_PDX is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2019, 12:41 pm
  #75  
Moderator, Delta Skymiles and Mileage Run
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Seat 2A
Programs: DL Diamond/MM, Hyatt Diamond, former AS MVPG 75K, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,940
This is a sad day.

Delta made flying AS very hard.

The downgrade of no domestic earning on AA made it impossible.

This pretty much means if you don't live in a west coast city you aren't really valued as a MP member :/
be_rettSEA likes this.
ryandc99 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.