Community
Wiki Posts
Search

[Rant] AS First Class Is a Bad Joke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2019, 9:04 am
  #76  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Programs: AS MVPG75k
Posts: 330
Originally Posted by sltlyamusd
However, the actual inflight service is not as consistent.
This is the most glaring problem, in my opinion (even more than the subpar interior maintenance). All it would take is improved training of FAs to improve service. There is no underlying cost to Alaska.

FAs sitting in the galley for three hours of a six-hour flight should not be SOP. Unfortunately, on the majority of transcons I've flown since the new training completed in Jan 2019, this is almost always the case. I've spoken with three FAs about this, two that came from VX and one from AS. All three said the newer training was less clear on proper etiquette in F cabin, with "if you have time" or "at your discretion" being common refrains from the trainer. The result: FAs feel they have wide latitude in how they offer First Class service which, in turn, is leading to frequent fliers and elites seeing wide disparities in service.

This is an entirely fixable problem by Alaska, but so far, there doesn't seem to be an interest in fixing it. Again, to those who will argue Alaska is trying to save pennies wherever possible, improving service minimum standards would not cost Alaska a dime.
Buster likes this.
jjmadison is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 9:07 am
  #77  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Programs: AS MVPG75k
Posts: 330
Originally Posted by VegasGambler
I actually didn't know that
You're in good company. I showed this to an AS exec who had been flying VX fleet for the last year. He was shocked.
jjmadison is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 9:34 am
  #78  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,621
Originally Posted by jjmadison
The VX F seats have fully adjustable lumbar support, in three different positions, and a massager. You can adjust the back support from soft to major lumbar, and at different heights on your back. Have you tried adjusting this before? They are the three small buttons under the armrest. You'll see them when you go to access retractable table.

Many guests don't know about this since AS FAs no longer inform passengers of this feature.
I don't recall if a VX FA ever informed me of this feature. Maybe, just maybe, one did once, but it was certainly not a regular thing in my experience.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 9:58 am
  #79  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Programs: AS MVPG75k
Posts: 330
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
I don't recall if a VX FA ever informed me of this feature. Maybe, just maybe, one did once, but it was certainly not a regular thing in my experience.
Most people definitely don't know about it. It was something they highlighted in their early advertising for the VX F product but didn't get much notice after. I always thought they should have included it in the F seat-back brochure.

Here's an old article referencing the adjustable lumbar and massager (#3):
https://thepointsguy.com/2017/09/experience-only-on-virgin-america/
"...
fully adjustable leg rests, lumbar support and massage functions."

And another:
http://fortune.com/2015/09/10/best-domestic-airlines-business-travel/
"...
spruced up an already standout first-class cabin, complementing the white leather seats and lumbar massagers."
jjmadison is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 12:33 pm
  #80  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,752
Originally Posted by CatchFlightsNotFeelings



i echo this 100%
Likewise. VG hit that one perfectly.

It's just hard for me to pay $$ for a product that is strategically used as a perk to be given away for free. If you give it away for free (or, greatly reduced price), it's what I'll choose; and, I'm certainly not going to be a schmuck & get ripped off by overpaying exorbitantly for it.
Visconti is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 12:58 pm
  #81  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,384
Originally Posted by Visconti
Likewise. VG hit that one perfectly.

It's just hard for me to pay $$ for a product that is strategically used as a perk to be given away for free. If you give it away for free (or, greatly reduced price), it's what I'll choose; and, I'm certainly not going to be a schmuck & get ripped off by overpaying exorbitantly for it.
The problem being that it's hard for enough people to pay for an F product like VX F for a 1-4 hour flight to justify the space it took up in the planes (that could have been used for a denser F and additional seats to be sold on the plane).

The OTT "best in class" shorthaul products like VX F are often state-owned airlines like TK or the ME3 (or it's a case where airlines are flying longhaul equipment on shorthaul routes for aircraft utilization). Conversely, in an industry where everyone had no hesitation copying each other on checked baggage fees, revenue-based earning, and so on, nobody fired up the copy machines on VX F for anything other than transcon (if it's used outside of transcon, it's for aircraft utilization purposes). In fact, Europe's degraded their shorthaul J experience, even though presumably there's money to be had there, and the most consistently profitable airline in the USA post-deregulation has precisely zero F seats.

Either airline executives are idiots who've said "let's not make money for our shareholders" or there aren't enough customers for VX F-style services on shorthaul to make it worth offering it (at the cost of denser cabins that can attract more Y sales).
MagicCarpetRider and jinglish like this.
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 1:13 pm
  #82  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,559
I've long felt like AS F was kind of a shabby F class, but I've had to temper my complaints for one reason: I can actually buy revenue F seats on 3-hour midcons for less than $100 per direction over Y. Considering a revenue F seat posts strong EQM/RDM bonuses and includes lounge access, it's a pretty good deal even if the product isn't top notch.
bbinchi likes this.
pinniped is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 1:23 pm
  #83  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,329
Originally Posted by pinniped
I've long felt like AS F was kind of a shabby F class, but I've had to temper my complaints for one reason: I can actually buy revenue F seats on 3-hour midcons for less than $100 per direction over Y. Considering a revenue F seat posts strong EQM/RDM bonuses and includes lounge access, it's a pretty good deal even if the product isn't top notch.
This x 1000. The ability to buy first class fares for 3-4 hour flights for around $200 each way, which include lounge access, is something no other airline can touch. Couple that with the fact that many of these are operated by E175s which offer seats with window & aisle access. Add in the ability to preorder meals and the excellent mileage earning, and Alaska stands out above the rest if you primarily fly these routes (which I do). Perhaps this is why I have a much higher opinion of AS than most. It's all about what YOU experience.
Colin, bbinchi, jjmadison and 3 others like this.
RAD_PDX is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 1:27 pm
  #84  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
Originally Posted by pinniped
I've long felt like AS F was kind of a shabby F class, but I've had to temper my complaints for one reason: I can actually buy revenue F seats on 3-hour midcons for less than $100 per direction over Y. Considering a revenue F seat posts strong EQM/RDM bonuses and includes lounge access, it's a pretty good deal even if the product isn't top notch.
On which routes? For SFO-AUS (which is a 3 hour route that I'm interested in flying) I generally see $200-$400 price differentials between main and first (I ignore saver)

I agree that $100 is a cheap main->first upgrade for a 3 hr flight... but is that really the norm? The only routes where I see that are very short (main->first on SFO-LAX is usually about $80, on SFO-PDX it's often in the $100-$150 range)
VegasGambler is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 1:34 pm
  #85  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,384
Originally Posted by VegasGambler
On which routes?
SEA-DEN/MKE/OMA advance purchase, on some routes I pulled up. It's certainly not on every route (SEA-DAL/DFW/AUS had higher prices).
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 1:35 pm
  #86  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,329
Originally Posted by VegasGambler
On which routes? For SFO-AUS (which is a 3 hour route that I'm interested in flying) I generally see $200-$400 price differentials between main and first (I ignore saver)

I agree that $100 is a cheap main->first upgrade for a 3 hr flight... but is that really the norm? The only routes where I see that are very short (main->first on SFO-LAX is usually about $80, on SFO-PDX it's often in the $100-$150 range)
SAN - STL/OMA/MCI, PDX-STL (when it existed) Range from $179-$229 quite often except for peak days. Granted, these are routes that some AS elites may never fly, but if you fly them, it's a screaming good deal.
RAD_PDX is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 2:12 pm
  #87  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
There was a $64 F fare SJC-BUR not too long ago. I think it was a $15 premium over Y.
channa is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 3:54 pm
  #88  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,559
Originally Posted by VegasGambler
On which routes? For SFO-AUS (which is a 3 hour route that I'm interested in flying) I generally see $200-$400 price differentials between main and first (I ignore saver)

I agree that $100 is a cheap main->first upgrade for a 3 hr flight... but is that really the norm? The only routes where I see that are very short (main->first on SFO-LAX is usually about $80, on SFO-PDX it's often in the $100-$150 range)
I've bought paid F on all of MCI-SAN, MCI-PDX, and MCI-SEA. Not uncommon to see Y at $119 and F at $219. SEA and PDX have big seasonal price swings, but even in the summer the gap is often still in the $100 range.

The PDX flight is on an E175 with is a very comfortable ride if you get an A seat.

The minute you throw in a connection, the $100 difference vanishes. MCI-SEA-PDX might still be $119 (or close) in Y, but it'll be $450+ in F.
pinniped is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 3:56 pm
  #89  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
Can we just end the Alaska F is crap and I want a VX F or lie flat seats threads please? While we all whine about the lack of PDB's or a missed blanket there are literately tens of thousands of people who have never flown first class and thinks anyone who does much be rich or a celebrity. For most people, flying in first on any airline is a once in a lifetime treat. Lets all think back to the first time we got to sit in the big seats and how it made you feel! Just trying to keep things in perspective.
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2019, 4:00 pm
  #90  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
Originally Posted by jsguyrus
Can we just end the Alaska F is crap and I want a VX F or lie flat seats threads please? While we all whine about the lack of PDB's or a missed blanket there are literately tens of thousands of people who have never flown first class and thinks anyone who does much be rich or a celebrity. For most people, flying in first on any airline is a once in a lifetime treat. Lets all think back to the first time we got to sit in the big seats and how it made you feel! Just trying to keep things in perspective.
I don't see how any of that matters.

The point is, if you pay for something, you should get it. That fact that others don't pay for it because they can't or don't want to is irrelevant.
VegasGambler is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.