Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

AS 1490: Oops, we have (only) ten minutes more gas!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AS 1490: Oops, we have (only) ten minutes more gas!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2019, 7:09 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: AMS & WAS
Posts: 36
AS 1490: Oops, we have (only) ten minutes more gas!

It should have been a very short hop, after flying from Baku (GYD) to Tbilisi (TBS); and also transiting at the new Istanbul Airport (IST again) and a long-haul TK 009 to LAX; to continue on to, Alaska 1490 from LAX to Las Vegas (LAS). But, not so. Because of strong winds and reports of wind shear, just before we approached LAS, ATC decided to stop movements. Our AS captain announced, that we would circle while waiting for approval to land. By the way, he also intimated, "we have ten minutes of extras gas", (that is a quote) and no problem, we can still divert/return back to LAX. Soon, ATC ordered a full ground stop. And we did return to LAX. Almost immediately, before the door was reopened, the captain came out and mic in hand announced, that LAS ATC had cleared the order and ops had resumed. Therefore, stay calm and poised as we would refuel and go back. Confusion ensued, as passengers, who had had enough debarked. With a ten hour time zone difference, and accommodation in Las Vegas now in jeopardy, one would have wished for hotel in LAX, and then an early flight to LAS. The person in charge, who seemed to make up rules, as passengers milled around and made requests or demands, announced, no, this was weather related (agreed) and the flight had now obviously not been cancelled, but the earliest flight the next day would be at 13:00 (a bust)! So another ordeal had begun. After other passengers had switched seats, and refueling took longer, announced then that it would be just a short ten minutes; there was also a weight and balance issue. And, sad to say, the 'computer' decided not to work. Probably because of GIGO! It would not accept the old flight number AS 1490 input once more. Long story short, we did take off and eventually land at LAS and debarked or deplaned close to 01:00. Some even clapped nervously as wing tips swayed quite a bit on landing in a cross wind. The point of all this is, perhaps someone from Alaska Airlines (knowing the weather situation) could have foreseen the possibility of being 'stacked' above Las Vegas McCarren and put in a bit more gas? My day of conventioneering and not fun, has certainly been ruined after traveling from half way around the world.

Last edited by Pondflyer; Apr 10, 2019 at 7:35 am
Pondflyer is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 7:37 am
  #2  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: AMS & WAS
Posts: 36
Screen images

Here are screen shots
Pondflyer is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 7:51 am
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
A whole series of different issues here.

You ultimately were on he gate at LAS at 00:43, just over 3 hours late. The reason was, as given, a ground stop at LAS. You were never at risk. Your aircraft actually departed LAX with enough fuel to hold over LAS and divert back to LAX and still have sufficient fuel to continue on and land at another diversion point should that have become necessary. This simply meant not much time holding over LAS.

Aircraft have maximum landing weights and yours was a very short flight. Had it been overloaded with fuel so that it could hold over LAS (which would have turned out futile), you would have had to hold over LAS until you burned the excess fuel.

The entire hotel issue makes no sense to me. Your flight was delayed and not cancelled. If people wanted to offload themselves, that is up to them.
Red L, jerry305, Gar1P and 4 others like this.
Often1 is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 8:19 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
So you were delayed by three hours because of weather, and? AS and every other airline does not fuel their aircraft for the possibilities of needing to fly in circles for three hours. Not much to see here folks, keep on moving!
Gar1P, AS Flyer and jinglish like this.
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 8:25 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Programs: UA GS; Former Alaska MVPG75/DL Diamond/NW Platinum/BA Gold
Posts: 942
Unfortunately wind is a frequent issue in vegas in early spring (and to a lesser extent other times of the year, too.... a function of temperature disparities from mountains surrounding a desert).

Sorry you had a rough go of it, but consider yourself lucky that the crew didn't time out consigning you to that flight 15 hours later.
Manoa Chris is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 10:41 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northern California
Programs: I want to be free! Free!
Posts: 3,454
ten more minutes of fuel prior to hitting reserve is a lot different than just having 10 more minutes of gas... can someone adjust the thread title
PVDtoDEL, wrp96, AS Flyer and 7 others like this.
aCavalierInCoach is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 11:03 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Programs: Alaska Tanzanite 100K
Posts: 3,858
I understand being delayed on a short flight when you've traversed the world.

However, delays at LAS are quite rare, like a UFO or alien sighting... so I'm not sure the folks in OCC have a crystal ball to see what's going to happen in 3 hours (when most flight plans are done, mind you) before departure. You had a series of unfortunate events, but at least you didn't divert to Phoenix or Palm Springs.

for a 3 hour delay, I'd recommend you use Alaska Listens and enjoy the $50 to $75 voucher they'll send you.
UAPremierExec is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 11:10 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
Originally Posted by UAPremierExec
However, delays at LAS are quite rare
I can't tell if that's sarcasm.

Delays at LAS are commonplace. I lost track of the number of times I've been sitting in SFO, either on the tarmac or at the gate, due to a ground stop in LAS (usually due to high winds in the summer)

Flying VX F, sitting on the tarmac was way better than the gate. Open bar!
Mauibaby2008 and jjmadison like this.
VegasGambler is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 11:33 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Programs: Alaska Tanzanite 100K
Posts: 3,858
Originally Posted by VegasGambler
I can't tell if that's sarcasm.

Delays at LAS are commonplace. I lost track of the number of times I've been sitting in SFO, either on the tarmac or at the gate, due to a ground stop in LAS (usually due to high winds in the summer)

Flying VX F, sitting on the tarmac was way better than the gate. Open bar!
Actually I stand corrected, didn't realize there's been some overscheduling -- friend that works for ATC said there's been a lot of problems with the wind shifting and then reorganizing all the departures/arrivals.
UAPremierExec is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 12:30 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,458
As others have pointed out, the Captain was saying that he could only circle LAS for 10 more minutes before diverting back to LAX. I would say that he had fueled the plane with probably 3 times the fuel actually needed (enough to get to LAS, circle the aiport for xx mins, and then to get back to LAX). and that sounds very reasonable to me.
formeraa is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 3:23 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northern California
Programs: I want to be free! Free!
Posts: 3,454
Originally Posted by formeraa
As others have pointed out, the Captain was saying that he could only circle LAS for 10 more minutes before diverting back to LAX. I would say that he had fueled the plane with probably 3 times the fuel actually needed (enough to get to LAS, circle the aiport for xx mins, and then to get back to LAX). and that sounds very reasonable to me.
I just fly the piston boys but I think IFR rules for commercial are the similar: you need to have enough fuel to get to your destination, plus enough fuel to get to your alternate (from the destination), and then another 45 minutes of fuel. Sure, they may have been within 10 minutes of that amount, but they had a heck of a lot of fuel on board.

I'm not current so shame on me I am forgetting how that moves when you don't need to designate an alternate (I think it just removes the destination to alternate requirement); theoretically could have been the case here since the alternate requirement is triggered by ceiling and visibility but not wind. Can't imagine a commercial flight wouldn't just stick to the tripartite framework as normal operating procedure.
aCavalierInCoach is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 4:55 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TUS/PDX
Programs: WN CP/A-List, AS MVPG75K
Posts: 5,798
Originally Posted by aCavalierInCoach
I just fly the piston boys but I think IFR rules for commercial are the similar: you need to have enough fuel to get to your destination, plus enough fuel to get to your alternate (from the destination), and then another 45 minutes of fuel. Sure, they may have been within 10 minutes of that amount, but they had a heck of a lot of fuel on board.

I'm not current so shame on me I am forgetting how that moves when you don't need to designate an alternate (I think it just removes the destination to alternate requirement); theoretically could have been the case here since the alternate requirement is triggered by ceiling and visibility but not wind. Can't imagine a commercial flight wouldn't just stick to the tripartite framework as normal operating procedure.
Planned fuel (in this case, the amount of gas needed to fly LAX-LAS), plus fuel to get to the alternate (back to LAX), plus whatever reserve/holding fuel they throw in, PLUS the contingency 45 minutes of gas.

Originally Posted by VegasGambler
Delays at LAS are commonplace. I lost track of the number of times I've been sitting in SFO, either on the tarmac or at the gate, due to a ground stop in LAS (usually due to high winds in the summer)
Can't say I've had many delays in Vegas myself, but I'm not based there, and thankfully only see the city a few times a year now.

Only real ones I've ever had are caused by the occasional thunderstorm in the summer. Spring winds can really get cranking in Vegas and they can really mess things up if the crosswind is out of limits for two of the runways.
tusphotog is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 4:59 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
Originally Posted by tusphotog
Can't say I've had many delays in Vegas myself, but I'm not based there, and thankfully only see the city a few times a year now.

Only real ones I've ever had are caused by the occasional thunderstorm in the summer. Spring winds can really get cranking in Vegas and they can really mess things up if the crosswind is out of limits for two of the runways.
Yeah, exactly. Even if it's not a thunderstorm there can be some really harsh cross winds. I've had some ground holds due to this, and also some pretty bumpy landings.
VegasGambler is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2019, 6:34 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: LAX
Programs: TK M&S, LH MM, Global Entry, Hertz Gold, Sixt Platinum
Posts: 1,087
We must have been on TK9 together yesterday!
gr8pirate is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.