"I" Class Fares Live? (Yes)
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,363
"I" appears to be one bucket below "P" (IAD-LAX it's $539 vs $619) ... as rustykettel pointed out, it apparently still gets the 75% COS bonus; I'll confirm after my May trip
#18
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
James in Phoenix
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
So, if they start selling more first class seats, that brings in revenue for the first class product, and a higher budget can be justified.
The incremental revenue from even one more person buying a first class seat instead of an economy seat on a flight is more than enough to pay for PDBs for everyone on that flight. Obviously hard product doesn't change quickly, but the soft product can definitely change quickly. If they would just start following stated policy, that would be a huge improvement.
#20
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 65
My guess would be that increasing the revenue from their first cabin would translate to continued investment and improvement in the product.
#21
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pacific Wonderland
Programs: ʙᴏɴᴠo̱ʏ Au, IHG Au, HH Dia, Nexus, Pilot FlyingJ Preferred
Posts: 5,336
From the 1Q19 report, AS expects to see ~$550/flight incremental revenue from the Airbus seat mods. Selling one or two F seats would easily match or exceed those gains and spread over the entire fleet.
#22
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
I think that in any business where a product is given away for free, it will constantly be the target for budget cuts. On the other hand, if it makes money, it tends to be safer from such cuts. This is true in any industry, and I've certainly seen it at companies that I've worked for.
So, if they start selling more first class seats, that brings in revenue for the first class product, and a higher budget can be justified.
The incremental revenue from even one more person buying a first class seat instead of an economy seat on a flight is more than enough to pay for PDBs for everyone on that flight. Obviously hard product doesn't change quickly, but the soft product can definitely change quickly. If they would just start following stated policy, that would be a huge improvement.
So, if they start selling more first class seats, that brings in revenue for the first class product, and a higher budget can be justified.
The incremental revenue from even one more person buying a first class seat instead of an economy seat on a flight is more than enough to pay for PDBs for everyone on that flight. Obviously hard product doesn't change quickly, but the soft product can definitely change quickly. If they would just start following stated policy, that would be a huge improvement.
James in Kelowna.
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
So in summary, an Alcoholic pre-departure beverage (which you have made blatantly obvious is of great importance to you) makes a crappy F hard-product (in your words) a good product overall? Hilarious! Would that sway you from a UA lie-flat to/from Hawaii? Likely not! But good try in masking your hypocrisy.
James in Kelowna.
James in Kelowna.
But, yes, improvements to the soft product count as an improvement to the product. Well I use them when a superior hard product is available with a different carrier? No, of course not. But for most domestic routes that isn't an option. An improved F product might get me to pay for it on shorter flights where I will fly AS anyway. I don't think that's hypocrisy.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 23,037
There were no new fares introduced with the introduction of the I booking class. They simply split the fares as follows -- Q/L/V/K fare basis FC fares go into I booking class and S/B/M/H fare basis FC fares go into P booking class as I mentioned upthread. The fares all existed before, they simply all booked into P booking class previously. Once again, the fare basis code first letter is not the same as the booking class for these restricted FC fares (and Saver fares as well). They use coach class fare codes as the first letter. The fact that they are actually FC or Saver fares is indicated by the second to last letter in the fare basis code.
So KH2OASFN and MH0OAVFN are two examples of restricted FC fares. But the KH2OASFN fare now books into I booking class instead of P.
So KH2OASFN and MH0OAVFN are two examples of restricted FC fares. But the KH2OASFN fare now books into I booking class instead of P.
Last edited by xliioper; Mar 30, 2019 at 9:29 pm
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
I wonder what the purpose is here, then? Move to lower earnings for lower level first class fares? Maybe 150% for I?
I was hoping that they would use this to introduce some cheaper first class fares to monetize the first class cabin. Right now I get the idea that most of the cabin is upgrades. I think that they tried to do that by holding out on U space last year but I don't think it was effective. Right now it seems like the first class buy-up is just too high, with the exception of a few routes.
There is no way that that relabeling some of their P fares to I is their only goal here.. there has to be a next step. It does give them more fine-grained inventory control, but all they can accomplish by that is raising the price of first class, which is probably not too useful if it's already not selling well.
I was hoping that they would use this to introduce some cheaper first class fares to monetize the first class cabin. Right now I get the idea that most of the cabin is upgrades. I think that they tried to do that by holding out on U space last year but I don't think it was effective. Right now it seems like the first class buy-up is just too high, with the exception of a few routes.
There is no way that that relabeling some of their P fares to I is their only goal here.. there has to be a next step. It does give them more fine-grained inventory control, but all they can accomplish by that is raising the price of first class, which is probably not too useful if it's already not selling well.
#28
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Between SFO and STS
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold, United Serf, Delta Gold
Posts: 731
#29
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 218