Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

Alaska Airlines flight diversion leads to a 30-hour nightmare for passengers

Alaska Airlines flight diversion leads to a 30-hour nightmare for passengers

Old Jan 7, 19, 9:31 pm
  #1  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,338
Post Alaska Airlines flight diversion leads to a 30-hour nightmare for passengers

Aaska Airlines faced a furious reaction from outraged passengers Monday following a weekend transcontinental flight that turned into a 30-hour nightmare journey.

Passengers boarded Alaska nonstop flight 1367 from Boston to Los Angeles on Saturday at 6 p.m., and waited almost two hours on the ground before takeoff in an uncomfortably hot cabin. Then just 90 minutes into the flight, they were diverted because of an electrical burning smell to Buffalo Niagara International Airport in New York.
More details spelled out in the news article.
https://www.seattletimes.com/busines...or-passengers/
tom911 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 19, 9:57 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 383
30 hours: Delay, unscheduled landing for safety issue, wait overnight for plane, return to BOS. Get on another flight.

The news says Alaska will do a "deep dive" and I am sure they will determine what can be better.
PaperGlider is offline  
Old Jan 7, 19, 10:37 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA Plat & 1MM, Marriott LT Gold, HHonors Gold, Hyatt Explorist & IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 12,223
Was astounded to see this story. This was supposed to be fixed by the new tarmac regs. I still don’t understand how people arriving on a domestic flight can be prohibited from leaving a US airport. Does TSA and Buffalo PD guard the airport exits?

I gather maybe Alaska doesn’t have personnel at Buffalo but that is all the more reason that they need to have a sound plan in place when these emergency landings occur. Will be more interested to see what improvements are made than in the compensation (which I expect will increase from the initial offer of $1000 in funny money)
mikeysf likes this.
Boraxo is online now  
Old Jan 7, 19, 10:50 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: EUG
Programs: BonVoy Ti, IHG Au, HH Au, Nexus, Pilot FlyingJ Preferred, *$ Au
Posts: 4,637
Originally Posted by Boraxo View Post
Was astounded to see this story. This was supposed to be fixed by the new tarmac regs. I still donít understand how people arriving on a domestic flight can be prohibited from leaving a US airport. Does TSA and Buffalo PD guard the airport exits?
Pax would normally need a valid same day boarding pass to clear security if they exit the secured area. That might be part of the problem.

Numerous points throughout this story where AS, their employees, and their contract staff (unless something has changed, most BOS ground staff are contract) dropped the ball.
rustykettel is online now  
Old Jan 7, 19, 10:59 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,402
I don't understand why people stayed at the airport. If this happened to me, I'd leave the airport, get a hotel room, get a good night's sleep, then call AS about getting me on a flight home.

Compensation for the room etc could be dealt with after the trip.
VegasGambler is offline  
Old Jan 7, 19, 11:05 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Back home in the REAL Washington (SEA); still working occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.3MM; AS MVPG 75K
Posts: 13,918
Originally Posted by VegasGambler View Post
I don't understand why people stayed at the airport. If this happened to me, I'd leave the airport, get a hotel room, get a good night's sleep, then call AS about getting me on a flight home.

Compensation for the room etc could be dealt with after the trip.
remember that we FTers are not in any way representative of the majority of airline passengers ... we are in large measure much more seasoned travelers, we are in large measure well acquainted with normal and not-so-normal airline operations, and we in large measure know how to interact with airline and airport personnel to get our questions answered and our interrupted trip back to some semblance of normal

as mentioned, the big issue was the diversion to an airport where AS has no presence; the late arrival into BUF probably meant minimal airport staffing in terms of TSA and baggage service, and minimal concessions availability

Last edited by jrl767; Jan 7, 19 at 11:12 pm
jrl767 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 19, 11:31 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold
Posts: 1,292
AS is going to need to work on East coast diversions. The problems at Buffalo are understandable, what is not understandable is flying them back to BOS and having them wait 12 hours there.
UAPremierExec and be_rettSEA like this.
jsguyrus is online now  
Old Jan 7, 19, 11:43 pm
  #8  
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,024
[M]aintenance technicians traced the electrical burning smell to a malfunctioning fan used to cool the seat back entertainment system on the Airbus A320. On Monday, Alaska was flying the plane back to a maintenance base on the West Coast.
dayone is offline  
Old Jan 7, 19, 11:49 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: EUG
Programs: BonVoy Ti, IHG Au, HH Au, Nexus, Pilot FlyingJ Preferred, *$ Au
Posts: 4,637
Originally Posted by jsguyrus View Post
AS is going to need to work on East coast diversions. The problems at Buffalo are understandable, what is not understandable is flying them back to BOS and having them wait 12 hours there.
Sounds like they were waiting for a rested crew. Either the original one, the comandeered BNA-SFO crew, or another rotation. At least returning to the origin allows some to cancel their trip or reschedule it and AS ground staff to (theoretically) assist pax.
rustykettel is online now  
Old Jan 7, 19, 11:51 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Between SFO and STS
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold, United Serf, Delta Gold
Posts: 702

Too bad they couldn't make it to DTW or PIT...
UAPremierExec likes this.
DrAlex is offline  
Old Jan 7, 19, 11:55 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TUS/PDX
Programs: WN CP/A-List, AS MVPG75K
Posts: 5,716
Originally Posted by jsguyrus View Post
The problems at Buffalo are understandable, what is not understandable is flying them back to BOS and having them wait 12 hours there.
My guess is the crew would time out if they flew BNA-BUF-LAX. So the options are get them back to BOS where thereís theoretically more options to get them moving, or overnight in BUF, get a plane in, and get everyone out the next morning. It sounds like the AS team in Boston was #northofexpected so probably overnighting everyone in the fifth best hotel in Buffalo would have been the better choice.

tusphotog is offline  
Old Jan 8, 19, 12:02 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SFO, mostly
Posts: 1,876
Originally Posted by DrAlex View Post

Too bad they couldn't make it to DTW or PIT...
Not excusing their handling of the situation, but regulations likely required diversion to the nearest suitable airport, hence BUF. Havenít flown AS out of BOS in quite a while, but in the past, ground staff was all contract.
sltlyamusd is online now  
Old Jan 8, 19, 12:10 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: EUG
Programs: BonVoy Ti, IHG Au, HH Au, Nexus, Pilot FlyingJ Preferred, *$ Au
Posts: 4,637
Originally Posted by dayone View Post
[M]aintenance technicians traced the electrical burning smell to a malfunctioning fan used to cool the seat back entertainment system on the Airbus A320. On Monday, Alaska was flying the plane back to a maintenance base on the West Coast.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n854va

Didn't quite make it to the west coast.
Attached Images  
rustykettel is online now  
Old Jan 8, 19, 12:12 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Originally Posted by Boraxo View Post
Was astounded to see this story. This was supposed to be fixed by the new tarmac regs. I still donít understand how people arriving on a domestic flight can be prohibited from leaving a US airport. Does TSA and Buffalo PD guard the airport exits?

I gather maybe Alaska doesnít have personnel at Buffalo but that is all the more reason that they need to have a sound plan in place when these emergency landings occur. Will be more interested to see what improvements are made than in the compensation (which I expect will increase from the initial offer of $1000 in funny money)
But it also appears Alaska has nobody on-call at night, so nobody to authorize anything.

So I guess it is true flying Alaska from the East Coast can be a nightmare.
be_rettSEA likes this.
s0ssos is offline  
Old Jan 8, 19, 12:13 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Back home in the REAL Washington (SEA); still working occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.3MM; AS MVPG 75K
Posts: 13,918
Originally Posted by sltlyamusd View Post
Not excusing their handling of the situation, but regulations likely required diversion to the nearest suitable airport, hence BUF.
beat me to it

Originally Posted by rustykettel View Post
Didn't quite make it to the west coast.
uh, that was the divert on Saturday (5 Jan)

it went BUF-JFK on Mon night and is currently scheduled JFK-LAX as AS1413 on Tue night

Originally Posted by s0ssos View Post
... So I guess it is true flying Alaska from the East Coast can be a nightmare.
yes there have been more than a few unscheduled fuel stops due to headwinds, and yes there have been maintenance issues that have led to delays and cancellations and diversions, but to that sort of generalization


Last edited by jrl767; Jan 8, 19 at 12:23 am
jrl767 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search Engine: