AS Plans to Keep DAL Gates
#1
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,316
AS Plans to Keep DAL Gates
"'We’re keeping both for sure. We love Love Field," said Alaska president and Virgin America CEO Ben Minicucci.
AS Will Keep Gates at Dallas Airport Dominated by Southwest
The two gates at space-constrained DAL are some of the most valuable real estate in the U.S. aviation industry. VX acquired the two gates from AA in 2014 when the Fort Worth-based carrier was forced to give them up as a condition of its merger with US.
AS Will Keep Gates at Dallas Airport Dominated by Southwest
The two gates at space-constrained DAL are some of the most valuable real estate in the U.S. aviation industry. VX acquired the two gates from AA in 2014 when the Fort Worth-based carrier was forced to give them up as a condition of its merger with US.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Usually in SAN or Central Europe.
Programs: AA:EXP/1MM. Accor/Radisson:Silver; HH:Gold; ICH:Plt Amb.
Posts: 22,307
I think they will be better off dumping the DAL-LGA service and selling those LGA slots for cash or a trade of JFK slots. The DCA-DAL (IIRC 3 slot pairs) have a bit more potential, as they might be able to trade them out for beyond-perimeter service in the future. It has been done once in the past. And then concentrate their service at DAL to their hubs/focus cities on the west coast.
#3
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,316
Per the merger terms, the slots are restricted and any sale or trade requires regulatory approval.
DAL-LGA/DCA are very viable routes and markets. And SEA-DAL will likely be added in the next year or so.
DAL-LGA/DCA are very viable routes and markets. And SEA-DAL will likely be added in the next year or so.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,390
I think they will be better off dumping the DAL-LGA service and selling those LGA slots for cash or a trade of JFK slots. The DCA-DAL (IIRC 3 slot pairs) have a bit more potential, as they might be able to trade them out for beyond-perimeter service in the future. It has been done once in the past. And then concentrate their service at DAL to their hubs/focus cities on the west coast.
https://www.virginamerica.com/cms/ab...n-at-laguardia
Virgin America secured 12 slots at LGA earlier this year as part of the American Airlines merger settlement.
Having a portfolio at all three NYC airports (even if it's not a big one at any one of them) isn't that bad of an idea.
I would imagine a portfolio of DAL-SEA/LAX/SFO/DCA/LGA to be pretty reasonable. I'm a touch more skeptical about the 1xLAS frequency (which is already down some from before). It wouldn't shock me to see AS resume LAX/SFO-DFW service, either, given their history of flying to multiple markets in Greater LA, Greater NYC and the Bay Area, and the fact that they can't put their code on AA flights. Since they already have a station at DFW, might as well use it...
Last edited by eponymous_coward; Apr 5, 2017 at 5:35 pm
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Calif./Eastern Ida.
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 20,640
the LGA perimeter restriction makes it a little less compelling for an airline that has declared they want to be the airline of the west coast.
i have got to imagine UA might be interested in more ops at LGA if they could get those slots. of course, they aren't going to give up anything at EWR to get them, and that could very well end up being a requirement of that type of transaction.
will be interesting to see what happens.
i have got to imagine UA might be interested in more ops at LGA if they could get those slots. of course, they aren't going to give up anything at EWR to get them, and that could very well end up being a requirement of that type of transaction.
will be interesting to see what happens.
#8
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SEA
Programs: DL Plat, AS MVPG, Bonvoy Plat/LT Gold, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,263
#9
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJC
Programs: DL PM MM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 3,276
It would be extremely irresponsible to allow a carrier who dominates LGA like AA or DL to have access to more slots when the entire point of the transaction was to have a non-dominant carrier get access to LGA (AS and VX are about as non-dominant at LGA as you can get). It would also be irresponsible to allow AS to sell to, say, WN, allowing them to dominate the DAL-LGA market. Once you eliminate AA/DL/UA/WN... who's left? B6? (I can't imagine NK or G4 are going to be interested.)
#10
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: B6 Mosaic, Bonvoy LT Titanium (x SPG LT), IHG Spire, UA Silver
Posts: 5,848
OTOH, AA and/or DL will serve smaller cites from LGA that no one else will serve. Adding WN or another LCC/ULCC will only add service to a route that already has service. While it makes for lower fares from those city pairs, it doesn't help those living away from major markets.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,390
OTOH, AA and/or DL will serve smaller cites from LGA that no one else will serve. Adding WN or another LCC/ULCC will only add service to a route that already has service. While it makes for lower fares from those city pairs, it doesn't help those living away from major markets.
That isn't particularly convincing logic, unless you think giving a single airline monopoly access to an airport is going to yield good pricing and outcomes for people wanting to fly to that airport.
PS: DL and AA don't serve DAL-LGA. Are you saying customers would be better served with a WN monopoly on DAL-LGA flying than by having two competing airlines on the route?
#12
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJC
Programs: DL PM MM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 3,276
By that logic, it would make the most sense to allow one airline to use all slots of a slot-restricted airport, since that would allow the most possible non-duplicative routes.
That isn't particularly convincing logic, unless you think giving a single airline monopoly access to an airport is going to yield good pricing and outcomes for people wanting to fly to that airport.
PS: DL and AA don't serve DAL-LGA. Are you saying customers would be better served with a WN monopoly on DAL-LGA flying?
That isn't particularly convincing logic, unless you think giving a single airline monopoly access to an airport is going to yield good pricing and outcomes for people wanting to fly to that airport.
PS: DL and AA don't serve DAL-LGA. Are you saying customers would be better served with a WN monopoly on DAL-LGA flying?
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,390
IMO, I'm not a fan of slots, though I know they are a necessary evil. But, I really think the perimeter restrictions for DCA and LGA should be ditched. It's one thing to not offer a customs facility, but it's another to artificially limit how far a plane can fly. This would help AS more since they could fly LGA/DCA-SEA/PDX/SFO/LAX/SAN.
I'm not sure that DCA has massive, unmet transcon demand. It's pretty well connected to most major West Coast markets.
LGA is trickier because of slot restrictions, but yeah, the perimeter rule is ridiculous.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,458