Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

AS Merger Impact on VX Routes [Consolidated]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AS Merger Impact on VX Routes [Consolidated]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2016, 9:19 pm
  #106  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,386
Originally Posted by quasihumanist
Point 1: I think there is some potential for AS to build a mini-hub somewhere in the Midwest - PIT, CLE, CMH, IND, and STL all come to mind as possibilities. That would make a good use of LGA slots. The real problem is having enough planes for it.
Four LGA/DCA slots isn't going to build a minihub anywhere. Out of the cities you've mentioned, exactly one has extant SEA/PDX service (STL). STL serves a metro area that has been fairly static in population for decades, compared to... wait for it... DAL/DFW.

There really isn't a reason to prefer STL to DAL for a "minihub". Both markets have lots of WN presence. The VX/AS presence at DAL is gate capped, but oh well. And a "minihub" of LGA, DCA, LAX, SFO, SEA, PDX and (maybe) LAS isn't the worst set of destinations for a minihub. Ideally you'd want a Texas destination or two out of DAL, but VX got buried trying to run AUS-DAL.
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2016, 9:51 pm
  #107  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SEA
Programs: Hilton/Marriott Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 2,036
Originally Posted by quasihumanist
Point 1: I think there is some potential for AS to build a mini-hub somewhere in the Midwest - PIT, CLE, CMH, IND, and STL all come to mind as possibilities. That would make a good use of LGA slots. The real problem is having enough planes for it.
Not that this matters one bit to AS, but as someone who's probably moving to Pittsburgh or Kansas City in the next couple of years, this is a possibility that I REALLY like. Both cities are former hubs that would probably appreciate some attention (PIT especially since there seems to be less of a WN presence there than at MCI). But, as you hinted at, one does not simply "build a hub," even a small one. Assembling the infrastructure to take care of maintenance and IRROPS isn't exactly cheap, and I'm not sure if I can see them taking that gamble while still trying to flesh things out in California.
Originally Posted by Fanjet
I think there will be a number of Q400s and E175s pulling up to the "new" AS gates at SFO.
I think this will be a huge factor in something I've mentioned hoping for recently: AS running with VX's interline agreement with JL and turning it into an actual partnership. I just booked a trip to ITM for Thanksgiving and had to make two separate bookings to get the itinerary I wanted (ex-YVR on JL with PDX-YVR on AS) because JL couldn't offer me that routing--although they could book me ex-SFO, with an AS PDX-SFO flight booked as an AA codeshare. An AS-JL relationship doesn't make much sense at the moment, but opening SFO to connections from much smaller markets (on a carrier besides UA) might be appealing to JL, especially since they could gain a little bit of feed to YVR as well.

Why does this matter to me at all? Because JL has 2-4-2 787s.
jinglish is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2016, 11:08 am
  #108  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,309
no huge AS FF base in the NYC area

there's probably no huge AS FF base in the New York area just clamoring for MCO flights. Those will NEVER happen.
The VAST majority of the people on the SEA/PDX-NYC area flights are most likely people from SEA/ PDX / area/ Pacific Northwest area who are flying to/ from NYC. Any NYC area residents probably take AS just because it's cheap or the times work out. Or perhaps they are DL/AA flyers for whom the times work better than AA/DL nonstop. I can assure you that AS has no large FF base in the NYC area just dying for an MCO flight.

There's ZERO way that there's a large enough AS FF community in the NYC area to support any non-hub AS flying into/ out of the NYC area.

Originally Posted by beyondhere
It could probably sell the DCA slots to either NK, F9 or B6, and could sell the LGA slots to one of those carriers or WN*. This assumes any of those carriers would make a decent offer.

*I think it'd be dicey if AS sold the DCA slots to WN, as the DOT might not want WN buying up essentially the great majority of AA's divested slots at DCA. It's unclear to me if UA could expand at DCA or LGA or if it would have any interest.

But all of those LCC carriers would just use those slots on DCA-Florida or LGA-Florida, so the question is what's to stop AS from just running some Florida service from LGA and DCA?

From 2015 Q3 fares, DCA-DAL stands out to me as weak with an average fare of $140. Q1 was $130. Granted this is an average between WN and VX, and VX specific data isn't listed.

However, 2015 Load factors show VX on DCA-DAL settling in the low 70s by the second half of the year, which likely isn't great. The first half seemed a struggle, but it's peak was surprisingly in May, at about 80%. In the same Q3 period, DCA-FLL had an average fare of $146, led by B6, and Q1 avg. fare was higher at $188. No doubt that FLL season is in Q1. Maybe it'd be an option for AS to switch from DCA-DAL to DCA-FLL. It could then hope that AA bows out, as AA already covers DCA-MIA. AA might anyways be ready to cover a route like DCA-IAH and will need some slots for it.

As for DAL-LGA, LFs were better for VX with it in the high 80s even by October of last year. The New York-Dallas market is large, undoubtedly.

However, fares aren't so hot, likely because of the competition. For 2015 Q3 fares, the NYC-Dallas average fare was $206, with AA being the largest carrier and it's average fare at $216. In contrast, LGA-MCO average fare was $182. Thus the average fare of NYC-Dallas was only about 19% greater than LGA-MCO, but the route was 45% longer. Granted, if AS were to switch to LGA-MCO, the average fare of LGA-MCO would likely drop with more competition (itself added on the route), but I believe it's a route that would perform well all year round, and be a popular market destination for AS FF that are in NY, that are supporting AS on the transcons.
jasondc is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.