Alaska nears $2B bid for Virgin America

  Wikipost is Locked   Hide Wikipost
Old Apr 6, 16, 3:49 pm   -   Wikipost
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been on FT for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: beckoa
Wiki Link
Please follow the discussion from the official announcement.
Print Wikipost

Old Apr 2, 16, 1:28 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: MSP
Programs: Delta PM, Hyatt Discoverist, Hertz PC
Posts: 2,190
Alaska nears $2B bid for Virgin America

Looks like Alaska may buy out Virgin America for $2 billion. It would beat out a rival offer from JetBlue.

Only way this makes sense to me is as a way to eliminate a competitor.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/alaska-a...ica-1459620895
jrkmsp is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 1:33 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Juneau, Alaska.
Posts: 12,709
Being discussed in detail here:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/alask...n-america.html
jerry a. laska is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 1:44 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: MSP
Programs: Delta PM, Hyatt Discoverist, Hertz PC
Posts: 2,190
Originally Posted by jerry a. laska View Post
Right. I guess it seemed this was a sufficiently distinct development. Maybe mods think differently.
jrkmsp is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 1:47 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVP, BW Plat, SPG Gold, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,393
Originally Posted by jrkmsp View Post
Right. I guess it seemed this was a sufficiently distinct development. Maybe mods think differently.
I think I tend to agree with you on this one....this is a significant development that was just published today, although it's too bad only the headline and first sentence are available for not WSJ subscribers. Sounds like this might be close to becoming a done deal...
PDXPremier is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 1:52 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Juneau, Alaska.
Posts: 12,709
Originally Posted by jrkmsp View Post
Right. I guess it seemed this was a sufficiently distinct development. Maybe mods think differently.
While the detailed report of the deal might be somewhat new, but speculation about whether the deal make sense has been discussed extensively in that thread.
Only way this makes sense to me is as a way to eliminate a competitor.
jerry a. laska is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 2:25 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SEA
Programs: DL FO, Hilton/Marriott Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by PDXPremier View Post
it's too bad only the headline and first sentence are available for not WSJ subscribers
Paste the headline into Google.
jinglish is online now  
Old Apr 2, 16, 2:59 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,790
Hopefully not going to happen, it would be like the UA and CO merger all over again, Alaska and Virgin America do not match.
airplanegod is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 3:26 pm
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: VX Elevate, B6 TrueBlue, DL SkyMiles
Posts: 72
Originally Posted by airplanegod View Post
Hopefully not going to happen, it would be like the UA and CO merger all over again, Alaska and Virgin America do not match.
That's b/c VX is the best airline this country has ever seen, and CRAPLASKA is garbage.
vxflyer is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 3:31 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SEA
Programs: DL FO, Hilton/Marriott Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by vxflyer View Post
That's b/c VX is the best airline this country has ever seen, and CRAPLASKA is garbage.
The really notable thing about FlyerTalk for me is that, despite being only a couple of years out of college, I feel like one of the more mature members here.

Would you honestly rather fly NK than AS?
jinglish is online now  
Old Apr 2, 16, 3:43 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,341
Originally Posted by vxflyer View Post
That's b/c VX is the best airline this country has ever seen, and CRAPLASKA is garbage.
Unless, of course, you're a shareholder. The only thing that kept VX out of bankruptcy was the plunge in fuel prices. VX shareholders are on their knees, praying this happens.
flytoeat is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 3:47 pm
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,790
Originally Posted by jinglish View Post
The really notable thing about FlyerTalk for me is that, despite being only a couple of years out of college, I feel like one of the more mature members here.

Would you honestly rather fly NK than AS?
Originally Posted by flytoeat View Post
Unless, of course, you're a shareholder. The only thing that kept VX out of bankruptcy was the plunge in fuel prices. VX shareholders are on their knees, praying this happens.
Not all about the money either, they have to be a correct match. VX and AS do not match in any way, shape, or form. B6 and VX are a much better match. I honestly do not believe AS "is nearing" a successful bid of VX.
airplanegod is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 3:49 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVP, BW Plat, SPG Gold, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,393
Originally Posted by jinglish View Post
The really notable thing about FlyerTalk for me is that, despite being only a couple of years out of college, I feel like one of the more mature members here.

Would you honestly rather fly NK than AS?
Good come back to an unusually harsh comment we don't (thankfully) see here in the AS forum too often. With that said, where did the NK reference come from in the post you were referencing??
PDXPremier is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 4:02 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: BLI
Programs: AS G75K
Posts: 175
Article:

Alaska Air Group Inc. has emerged as the likely winner of an auction for Virgin America Inc., people familiar with the matter said.

The company is nearing a deal to buy Virgin America after beating a rival bid by JetBlue Airways Corp., the people said.

From http://www.wsj.com/articles/alaska-a...ica-1459620895

Last edited by jackal; Apr 2, 16 at 5:00 pm Reason: Posting full-text of newspaper articles is a violation of copyright law
3ur0tr45h is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 4:05 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJC
Programs: DL PM, SPG Plat
Posts: 3,054
It would be a really interesting pairing. AS has done a great job carving out a niche in SEA, the state of Alaska, and to a lesser extent PDX along with some decent operations out of SAN, LAX, and SJC. AS also will fly point to point routes on which they can make a buck or two. To my knowledge, VX has never flown a route that is not flown by a legacy carrier. Their business plan has been that people will fly us because we are better (not cheaper or more convenient or any other reason most people choose an airline). Plus, VX mostly flies leased Airbuses (I think they own 7 of them) while AS is proudly all Boeing (though they used to have Douglas/MD planes).

It would be interesting to see what happens with the combined carrier. Does AS shrink SJC and put more eggs into the SFO cart (or vice versa)? Does AS keep the Airbuses? How will VX react to the less "hip" culture of AS? Again, very interesting.
SJC ORD LDR is offline  
Old Apr 2, 16, 4:19 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Canada
Programs: AS, DL, UA, Hyatt, SPG
Posts: 2,510
Originally Posted by vxflyer View Post
That's b/c VX is the best airline this country has ever seen, and CRAPLASKA is garbage.
One could argue that any start up airline could choose to be a great airline, providing an awesome product - but at a cost vs revenue level that haemorrhages money and leads to steady losses.

Fortunately for VX - pretty much every carrier is able to make money right now with fuel pricing where it is today.

To say that Alaska is a garbage carrier however is a stretch. They consistently rank among the top large carriers in the US in everything from DOT on time performance to customer complaint handling, have a robust frequent flyer program, and a largely loyal customer following. My interactions with Alaska as an MVPG the last four years have almost uniformly been a positive experience, with a number of "above and beyond" resolutions to any issues I've encountered.

Second, AS has a significant short-haul network. VX - at it's inception - made longhaul domestic travel a key focus of their business plan and needed to have a product - particularly in the front end - that could stand up to the upgraded premium cabin offerings of network carriers. The LA/SF - NYC routes in particular are a fiercely contested market and require a very different hard and soft product to gain any serious traction with a premium high revenue customer base.

Are they two very different airlines serving very different markets and customer bases? Yes. Does that mean Alaska is "crap"? No.

Will it thus make for interesting speculation of how the airlines might be able to merge? Absolutely!

Last edited by SamuelS; Apr 2, 16 at 4:29 pm
SamuelS is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread