Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

Alaska to Take First 737 MAX Delivery - First Flights in March 2021

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Alaska to Take First 737 MAX Delivery - First Flights in March 2021

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2017, 10:47 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS MVP Gold
Posts: 1,093
Originally Posted by flyupfrnt

Alaska Took Delivery of Another 737-900ER Today, Ship #N283AK - She had a crew of AS folks working on her outside the Maintenance Hangar at SEA tonight.
Beautiful. I flew aboard N280AK as AS12/09DEC SEABOS and aboard N277AK operating AS15/10DEC BOSSEA. I was struck by how much more comfortable the experience was aboard those new airplanes than on the older "739" equipment. Particularly the lighting and the HVAC system are much improved. Those flights were my first aboard a "739" where I felt relaxed and not stuffy. I have been way too warm on older 737-990ER aircraft, which seem to have problematic HVAC systems. And the lavatories on the new airplanes are very well designed. They are, indeed, the narrowest lavs I've been in but the layout is smart and the new faucets work very well.
bbinchi is offline  
Old Dec 12, 2017, 12:40 am
  #47  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, Moderator, Information Desk, Ambassador, Alaska Airlines
Hilton Contributor BadgeIHG Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FAI
Programs: AS MVP Gold100K, AS 1MM, Maika`i Card, AGR, HH Gold, Hertz PC, Marriott Titanium LTG, CO, 7H, BA, 8E
Posts: 42,953
Originally Posted by bbinchi
Beautiful. I flew aboard N280AK as AS12/09DEC SEABOS and aboard N277AK operating AS15/10DEC BOSSEA. I was struck by how much more comfortable the experience was aboard those new airplanes than on the older "739" equipment. Particularly the lighting and the HVAC system are much improved. Those flights were my first aboard a "739" where I felt relaxed and not stuffy. I have been way too warm on older 737-990ER aircraft, which seem to have problematic HVAC systems. And the lavatories on the new airplanes are very well designed. They are, indeed, the narrowest lavs I've been in but the layout is smart and the new faucets work very well.
I miss the configuration of the 739 lavs that AS was the launch customer of...
beckoa is offline  
Old Dec 12, 2017, 12:57 pm
  #48  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,933
Originally Posted by N830MH
Originally Posted by rustykettel
A bit narrower, but I could go for international PE configured domestic F.
No, it won't be PE on MAX8 or MAX9 aircraft. Only economy class and first class configured.
I think you misunderstood what was was being asked. It was not whether the plane would have PE, it was whether the first class seats on this plane could be more like the seats found in PE cabins on international planes (ie, more like the seats in the link). Ie, it was a question about the nature of the F seats, not about a PE cabin.

As to cabins, the plane will presumably have the same Premium Class subsection that other Alaska planes now have or are soon getting, but that's technically not a separate cabin:

Premium Class Discussion
sdsearch is offline  
Old Mar 10, 2019, 6:58 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle WA
Programs: AS 100K, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 1,828
Will be interesting to see if AS talks publicly about the pilot training they'll be doing for the MAX, after today's very sad incident involving a second brand new MAX airplane...
Tracer_SEA is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2019, 12:29 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: AS - MVPG; DL - SM; Marriott, Hilton, SPG - Gold
Posts: 194
Originally Posted by Tracer_SEA
Will be interesting to see if AS talks publicly about the pilot training they'll be doing for the MAX, after today's very sad incident involving a second brand new MAX airplane...
I was wondering that as well. This has got to have some impact on the timetable for AS to fully incorporate the Max-8s, I'd think.
LWkitty is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2019, 6:50 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by antebellum
Don't know whether is safe to fly on 737 MAX 8 now. Probably FAA is going to order all carriers to suspend the operation of this type until both Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines incident have completed investigation.
Probably one should wait to see facts, such as whether the incidents are correlated, before drawing such dramatic conclusions.

To to keep this discussion on topic, I have full confidence that AS (and other major airline crews) will not operate an unsafe aircraft. I don’t think Boeing will knowingly sell one, nor the FAA permit operation.
fly18725 is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2019, 9:27 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Near SEA
Programs: UA MM, AS MVPG75K, Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 7,969
Originally Posted by LWkitty
I was wondering that as well. This has got to have some impact on the timetable for AS to fully incorporate the Max-8s, I'd think.
Didn't Alaska switch all of those orders to Max-9s?
bmvaughn is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2019, 10:09 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: AS - MVPG; DL - SM; Marriott, Hilton, SPG - Gold
Posts: 194
Originally Posted by bmvaughn
Didn't Alaska switch all of those orders to Max-9s?
Good catch. You are correct, they did.
LWkitty is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2019, 2:09 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: BART Platinum, AA Plat Pro
Posts: 1,158
Originally Posted by jsguyrus
To be fair, that was almost 20 years ago now. A lot has changed for the better since then.
To be clear, I think AS is in a much better place now than they were then (in terms of safety culture). The more disturbing part of the 261 episode, however, was not that AS was cutting corners right and left at all levels (which it was). It's that this should have been obvious to the FAA, and they just turned a blind eye to it. I'm not so convinced that part has fundamentally changed.

As for Boeing, they're going to rate 57 (per month) on the MAX. That's more than double the production of all their other commercial aircraft models combined. They depend on that cash flow, so the only way they will consider a long stoppage or redesign of the aircraft is if they literally think there's a risk that this safety issue could bankrupt the entire company. I doubt it's at that point yet.
milypan is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2019, 3:04 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75K, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by milypan
To be clear, I think AS is in a much better place now than they were then (in terms of safety culture). The more disturbing part of the 261 episode, however, was not that AS was cutting corners right and left at all levels (which it was). It's that this should have been obvious to the FAA, and they just turned a blind eye to it. I'm not so convinced that part has fundamentally changed.

As for Boeing, they're going to rate 57 (per month) on the MAX. That's more than double the production of all their other commercial aircraft models combined. They depend on that cash flow, so the only way they will consider a long stoppage or redesign of the aircraft is if they literally think there's a risk that this safety issue could bankrupt the entire company. I doubt it's at that point yet.
How many new orders are they likely to get for Max 8 between now and the official reporting for these incidents? Could this effect other Max product? Lots of uncertainty on a very big ticket item. This is going to hurt.
NWAlaskaFlyer is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2019, 4:07 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: BART Platinum, AA Plat Pro
Posts: 1,158
Getting back on topic, AS currently has 32 MAX9s on order. Conveniently they also have 30 A320neos that, according to Wikipedia, were "transferred from Virgin America, but may be cancelled." So I suspect they're in a pretty good place regardless of what happens to the MAX, unless they have some big expansion plans that they've been playing close to the vest. Conveniently that would also allow them to maintain the "Proudly All-Boeing/Airbus/Embraer/Bombardier" fleet that AAG currently sports.

Last edited by dayone; Mar 11, 2019 at 4:32 pm Reason: Redact quote of deleted off-topic post.
milypan is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2019, 4:26 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Programs: AS 100K, HH Diamond, SPG/Marriott Gold
Posts: 189
Originally Posted by milypan
Getting back on topic, AS currently has 32 MAX9s on order. Conveniently they also have 30 A320neos that, according to Wikipedia, were "transferred from Virgin America, but may be cancelled." So I suspect they're in a pretty good place regardless of what happens to the MAX, unless they have some big expansion plans that they've been playing close to the vest. Conveniently that would also allow them to maintain the "Proudly All-Boeing/Airbus/Embraer/Bombardier" fleet that AAG currently sports.
That's very true. From discussions I've had, I'm not convinced that they're planning to expand big, at least not unless a golden opportunity presents itself. Instead, I'd imagine that we'd see continued organic growth for the next 5-10 years. AS current orders seem to reflect that as well. They have some ability to sell orders to other carriers too, right?

Last edited by dayone; Mar 11, 2019 at 4:34 pm Reason: Redact partial quote of deleted off-topic post.
icelandman2 is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2019, 4:30 pm
  #58  
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,316
Moderator Note: This thread is an ongoing discussion of AS' addition of MAX aircraft. General comments about the recent MAX crash and MAX safety have been and will be deleted. Those comments may be posted on other FT threads discussing those topics.

dayone, AS Moderator.
icelandman2 likes this.

Last edited by dayone; Mar 11, 2019 at 4:37 pm Reason: Clarity.
dayone is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2019, 4:48 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
Originally Posted by milypan
Conveniently that would also allow them to maintain the "Proudly All-Boeing/Airbus/Embraer/Bombardier" fleet that AAG currently sports.
Since Airbus owns a large share of Bombardier and Boeing is soon to own a large share of Embraer, we can just say "Proudly all Boeing (and Airbus)". As they say, 100% of the time you will fly on a Boeing 50% of the time!
tusphotog likes this.
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Mar 12, 2019, 8:31 am
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by milypan
Conveniently that would also allow them to maintain the "Proudly All-Boeing/Airbus/Embraer/Bombardier" fleet that AAG currently sports.
Hey, that's my signature!
milypan likes this.
channa is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.