Domestic flight chaos today (8 March)...Why?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Programs: NZ Elite; QF Platinum; CZ Gold; MU Platinum; Marriott Titanium; Accor Platinum
Posts: 1,467
Domestic flight chaos today (8 March)...Why?
Sitting in the overpacked Koru in AKL domestic for hours with a delayed flight to CHC, hearing cancellations and continual delays. All the delays are either "operation reasons" or "due to the late running of the inbound aircraft"
Anyone know why? There was some rain but it did not seem that bad. Has there been a storm across the country or something?
great fun on a Friday!!
Anyone know why? There was some rain but it did not seem that bad. Has there been a storm across the country or something?
great fun on a Friday!!
#2
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,115
Weather has been terrible across the country. Also follow on issues from yesterday's bad weather. I managed to get the last flight out of ZQN yesterday, everything arriving later turned around.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Programs: NZ Elite; QF Platinum; CZ Gold; MU Platinum; Marriott Titanium; Accor Platinum
Posts: 1,467
Thanks for the update. Some of the delays are really bad My flight is looking like over 90 minutes but some Dunedin flights are worse
#4
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,115
I just had a quick look at pretty much every flight flying around NZ at present on FR24. Closest I saw to on time was CHC-TRG which was 15 mins late. Everything else is pretty much 30+ mins with plenty 60+ mins late.
Don't think I've seen a day this bad for a while!. It's amazing what crap weather in AKL and WLG can do to an entire domestic network.
Don't think I've seen a day this bad for a while!. It's amazing what crap weather in AKL and WLG can do to an entire domestic network.
#5
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AKL
Programs: NZ Silver
Posts: 1,817
Yesterday (Friday) would've been a perfect day for aviating down South, the North Island was obviously a different story judging by the cricket. Thursday however was very windy over Central Otago way, ZQN seemed to be not too bad though, but come evening some much needed rain came through and potentially the associated low cloud may've been the issue...although jet flights should've been fine at ZQN.
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Programs: NZ Elite; QF Platinum; CZ Gold; MU Platinum; Marriott Titanium; Accor Platinum
Posts: 1,467
While the Koru lounge was full and standing room only, when I went to board my flight at 8pm realised how comparatively fortunate we are as the airside terminal was awful. No seats, people sitting on the floor even standing. It just shows what an absolute disgrace the domestic terminal is. And its clearly years away before any material improvement happens.
#8
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,115
Yesterday (Friday) would've been a perfect day for aviating down South, the North Island was obviously a different story judging by the cricket. Thursday however was very windy over Central Otago way, ZQN seemed to be not too bad though, but come evening some much needed rain came through and potentially the associated low cloud may've been the issue...although jet flights should've been fine at ZQN.
Rain set in reducing visibility and caused at least one A320 go around late morning.
My inbound aircraft made it in slightly late but we left late but I think we were the last to get out with only one aircraft landing just after us before everything else for the evening was canned.
I don't know how many people took NZ's advice of changing to Friday but it clearly wasn't smart advice - first flights out were all canned to to inbound aircraft not making it in on Thu evening, which then caused massive follow on issues. I think some pax were bussed to DUN to get them on flights.
#9
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AKL
Programs: NZ Silver
Posts: 1,817
I flew out of ZQN on Thursday. Was on the 1615 to WLG and had multiple messages from NZ from about 11:30 advising people to defer travel until Friday due to expected issues later in the day.
Rain set in reducing visibility and caused at least one A320 go around late morning.
My inbound aircraft made it in slightly late but we left late but I think we were the last to get out with only one aircraft landing just after us before everything else for the evening was canned.
I don't know how many people took NZ's advice of changing to Friday but it clearly wasn't smart advice - first flights out were all canned to to inbound aircraft not making it in on Thu evening, which then caused massive follow on issues. I think some pax were bussed to DUN to get them on flights.
Rain set in reducing visibility and caused at least one A320 go around late morning.
My inbound aircraft made it in slightly late but we left late but I think we were the last to get out with only one aircraft landing just after us before everything else for the evening was canned.
I don't know how many people took NZ's advice of changing to Friday but it clearly wasn't smart advice - first flights out were all canned to to inbound aircraft not making it in on Thu evening, which then caused massive follow on issues. I think some pax were bussed to DUN to get them on flights.
#10
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,645
Night and Visibility are two different things. At night can still see runway lighting and any hazard lights.
Visibility is about how far can see open sky vs fog
#11
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AKL
Programs: NZ Silver
Posts: 1,817
The RNP-AR for ZQN I think still has a visual decision attitude. Was it just visibility or were the winds out of allowance?
Night and Visibility are two different things. At night can still see runway lighting and any hazard lights.
Visibility is about how far can see open sky vs fog
Night and Visibility are two different things. At night can still see runway lighting and any hazard lights.
Visibility is about how far can see open sky vs fog
#12
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,115
RNP doesn't remove the need to be able to see the runway approaching minimums. To land in zero visibility you need Cat III ILS which only Auckland has.
#13
Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: Lifetime *G (MP), Lifetime PE (Bonvoy)
Posts: 1,465
While the Koru lounge was full and standing room only, when I went to board my flight at 8pm realised how comparatively fortunate we are as the airside terminal was awful. No seats, people sitting on the floor even standing. It just shows what an absolute disgrace the domestic terminal is. And its clearly years away before any material improvement happens.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WLG/BKK
Programs: TG*G, NZ*GE, QF G, Accor Gold
Posts: 10,195
http://www.aip.net.nz/pdf/NZQN_45.1_45.2.pdf
I won’t get into the details, but the RNAV approach to Runway 05 (ie to the north east) has less restrictive visibility criteria and gets you lower at the Missed Approach Point (MAPt) than the approach to Runway 23. The differences are significant.
At the MAPt; the following is required for the most capable category of aircraft:
Rwy05 needs 1300m viz, gets down to 278 feet above terrain at MAPt
Rwy23 needs 3600m viz, gets down to 704 feet above terrain at MAPt
See the magnified areas on the information box bottom righ of each chart
It has been a while since I was current in flying IFR, so happy for any corrections....
Last edited by Thai-Kiwi; Mar 9, 2019 at 7:50 pm Reason: correct vis requirements and spelling
#15
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AKL
Programs: NZ Silver
Posts: 1,817
Thanks TK for that.
Very slightly related to approaches/visibility etc., does anyone know why DUD has the lights to stop traffic on the road beside the eastern end of the runway? A month or so ago I had stop mid-afternoon (clear day) while an ATR departed overhead. I could maybe understand at night (but surly none would be stupid enough to mistake the car head lights for the runways with all the other lighting around) for landing, but a day time departure surprised me.
Very slightly related to approaches/visibility etc., does anyone know why DUD has the lights to stop traffic on the road beside the eastern end of the runway? A month or so ago I had stop mid-afternoon (clear day) while an ATR departed overhead. I could maybe understand at night (but surly none would be stupid enough to mistake the car head lights for the runways with all the other lighting around) for landing, but a day time departure surprised me.