Why is transiting onto 3rd destination cheaper than flying direct?
I was just looking AKL to HKG in business class return. $5500
Yet, AKL to HKG, to CAN in business class return, same dates, etc, only $3000 Why the price difference? Does not make sense to me. |
I'd hazard a guess its due to competition from airlines like China Eastern.... looks like THEY charge as little as AUD $2600 for AKL-CAN (via PVG), whereas I suspect AKL-HKG does NOT have such low cost competition..
|
Originally Posted by trooper
(Post 30676797)
I'd hazard a guess its due to competition from airlines like China Eastern.... looks like THEY charge as little as AUD $2600 for AKL-CAN (via PVG), whereas I suspect AKL-HKG does NOT have such low cost competition..
|
NZ do the same from the USA...it's often cheaper to fly from the USA to Aus (via AKL) than USA-AKL.
|
Originally Posted by Bub001
(Post 30676876)
Yes, but it’s China Southern who fly directly into CAN that’s a more attractive option. Especiallly at this time of year flying their brand new 787-9 with the 1-2-1 layout....vastly superior to NZ. |
This is fairly common with carriers throughout the world, often because there is a premium for direct flights most likely due to demand. For instance LHR-AMS-JFK with KLM will often be cheaper than AMS-JFK whilst AMS-LHR-JFK with BA will be cheaper than LHR-JFK...
|
Originally Posted by curioustill
(Post 30676775)
Does not make sense to me.
Things have been this way for a long time, and will continue to be priced this way due to the simple fact airline pricing is often all about price perception and competition, not necessarily about consistency or logic. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:10 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.