Fuel shortage affects Auckland Airport flights after leak halts supply
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Zealand
Programs: Koru/*S, GHA Gold
Posts: 931
Fuel shortage affects Auckland Airport flights after leak halts supply
https://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/trave...k-halts-supply
The pipeline that connects Marsden Point refinery to AKL airport has been leaking so it has been closed, with fuel supplies to airlines being impacted.
At least one flight has had to stop at Christchurch to top up.
The pipeline that connects Marsden Point refinery to AKL airport has been leaking so it has been closed, with fuel supplies to airlines being impacted.
At least one flight has had to stop at Christchurch to top up.
#4
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: NZ*GE
Posts: 153
Things could be a mess for a few days: I'm tried a couple of hours ago o move my AKl-WLG flight on Wed and there was nothing at all showing as avail mon - thu. Flights back on stream now for changes, so that's good news... for now
Last edited by Flygirlnz; Sep 16, 17 at 9:43 pm Reason: Update
#5
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 93
#6
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Programs: NZ Elite; QF Platinum; CZ Gold; MU Platinum; Marriott Titanium; Accor Platinum
Posts: 1,262
So apparently it was a digger used in logging
Presumably something like this will be investigated and if found to be at fault the company operating this digger can be fined?
Will cause a huge economic loss
Presumably something like this will be investigated and if found to be at fault the company operating this digger can be fined?
Will cause a huge economic loss
#9
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 229
I'm confused about airnz cancelling return flights CHC-AKL-CHC; WLG-AKL-WLG; AKL-SYD-AKL. Surely the A320s can just take on extra fuel in CHC, WLG, and SYD. Yes, it would cost more to operate the flight, but there's nothing that would prevent that. A320s routinely fly 6hr transcon in the US, so I could not imagine time or distance would be an issue...will be interested to hear from those with greater tech knowledge. Feel sorry for those on long haul flights from Asia and the US needing refuelling stops (in Australia and Pacific respectively, I presume). Nothing to do with airnz, but the country looks pretty foolish not to have a redundant back up for this critical infrastructure.
#10
Join Date: Sep 2017
Programs: Air NZ Koru, Air NZ ELT *G, IHG Spire Ambassador, Emirates, Flying Blue, QANTAS Club
Posts: 353
I'm confused about airnz cancelling return flights CHC-AKL-CHC; WLG-AKL-WLG; AKL-SYD-AKL. Surely the A320s can just take on extra fuel in CHC, WLG, and SYD. Yes, it would cost more to operate the flight, but there's nothing that would prevent that. A320s routinely fly 6hr transcon in the US, so I could not imagine time or distance would be an issue...will be interested to hear from those with greater tech knowledge. Feel sorry for those on long haul flights from Asia and the US needing refuelling stops (in Australia and Pacific respectively, I presume). Nothing to do with airnz, but the country looks pretty foolish not to have a redundant back up for this critical infrastructure.
Flying 6 hours in 1 flight might consume less fuel?
Just now waiting for an election promise to build a second pipeline. The Government will spend up for the private fuel companies who gouged consumers!
#11
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: NZ Koru
Posts: 5,908
Couldn't apart of this issue have had less of an impact if AKL had of built an new larger fuel storage depot by now? that isn't next to an Terminal. With all of the extra flights in the past 10 years, yet they have done nothing to increase storage onsite.
#12
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: NZ Elite *G, HHonors Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 4,967
I too am a little intrigued at the main trunk jet cancellations when you'd just assume they could fill up at WLG or CHC. I wonder if it's just part of an overall strategy to use less fuel overall for a few days?
I see on nzsource it mentions NZ5 today having a tech stop in NAN to refuel on it's way from LAX to AKL which will presumably give it enough fuel to fly it's next hop to Australia.
I wonder what the impacts are on airports such as NAN of this? Surely they don't have mass surplus A1 sitting there to top up every 777 that passes overhead.
I see on nzsource it mentions NZ5 today having a tech stop in NAN to refuel on it's way from LAX to AKL which will presumably give it enough fuel to fly it's next hop to Australia.
I wonder what the impacts are on airports such as NAN of this? Surely they don't have mass surplus A1 sitting there to top up every 777 that passes overhead.
#13
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: SQ TPPS (18), EK S, NZ E, IHG Spire RA, Marriott Gold, HH Gold, Shangri-La Jade, Accor Plat
Posts: 366
Building a second line has been considered but has never made economic sense, and the government has certainly not offered to pay, naturally. This issue might trigger a rethink.
#14
Join Date: Jul 2014
Programs: Air NZ Elite, Krisflyer Gold, Qantas Gold
Posts: 41
But having to have two techs fly in from Canada to fix it?
Surely our country could do better?
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Zealand
Programs: Koru/*S, GHA Gold
Posts: 931
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=11923293
Only having 30% of the normal fuel available will explain why domestic and international flights are being impacted.
Z Energy spokesman Jonathan Hill ... said the airline industry had come up with an arrangement that meant each airline was allowed 30 per cent of what they normally take.