NRT/AKL equipment question
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,577
NRT/AKL equipment question
Maybe this has been answered elsewhere, if so please move my post. We were on NZ 99 AKL-NRT and had booked the flight last year when it showed up as a 77. When I checked a couple of weeks ago, it was changed to a 67 and our 2 window flat bed seats were changed for the bulkhead seats in row 1. This was a horrible experience and probably the worst seat ever for an 11 hour flight. We have another flight booked back to AKL on August 17, NZ 90 and right now it shows as a 77. Will they switch equipment again? If so or even if there is a chance, then I will preemptively re-book to SQ or TG via SIN/BKK. No way I will fly the seats on the 67 again. I love the Boeing 767 but these seats are just beyond bad. Thanks for your help.
#2
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
Quite possible, maybe even probable. There are lots of complaints about NRT and PVG flights which NZ often uses 767 on.
I try to avoid this route as I don't accept the risk of downgauge resulting in the worse seat. However, this is very difficult on *A premium awards because NZ only ever releases business class award seats on the PVG (and to a lesser extent NRT) route.
I try to avoid this route as I don't accept the risk of downgauge resulting in the worse seat. However, this is very difficult on *A premium awards because NZ only ever releases business class award seats on the PVG (and to a lesser extent NRT) route.
#3
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,116
The reality is it could be swapped out at any time depending on the capacity requirements on the route.
I flew both ways to NRT in J on a 763 in April in business. I think the crew are even embarrassed by the product they have on offer. I don't mind the 763 for a day flight, but didn't manage to get any sleep at all on the way back.
The only perk of the 763 is that it's a cheap upgrade direct from Y.
I flew both ways to NRT in J on a 763 in April in business. I think the crew are even embarrassed by the product they have on offer. I don't mind the 763 for a day flight, but didn't manage to get any sleep at all on the way back.
The only perk of the 763 is that it's a cheap upgrade direct from Y.
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,577
[QUOTE=sbiddle;22962213
I flew both ways to NRT in J on a 763 in April in business. I think the crew are even embarrassed by the product they have on offer..[/QUOTE]
The crew was indeed embarrassed and although it certainly wasn't their fault, they profoundly apologized for the poor experience we had, they pointed out that the 787 was scheduled to fly this route in the future. Nice prospect, but didn't help us a bit.
Based on your responses, I will try to make a change in my reservations.
I flew both ways to NRT in J on a 763 in April in business. I think the crew are even embarrassed by the product they have on offer..[/QUOTE]
The crew was indeed embarrassed and although it certainly wasn't their fault, they profoundly apologized for the poor experience we had, they pointed out that the 787 was scheduled to fly this route in the future. Nice prospect, but didn't help us a bit.
Based on your responses, I will try to make a change in my reservations.
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,577
Strangely enough, PVG-AKL always shows up for me, NRT rarely. However, I have to catch a Monday morning flight to PPT and the NRT flight is the only one that remotely gives me a chance to catch my connection with only 60 minutes to spare.
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,577
#12
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TRG, NZ
Programs: NZG,QF S
Posts: 140
Feeling a little "underwhelmed" for options early next week to get to Busan at short notice.
Options are transit via PVG or NRT. - in Y
PVG is 772 & NRT 767
PVG is overnight flight. Not worth upgrading to Prem Econ.
NRT -day flight. Maybe worth trying for a J upgrade
Your thoughts?
Options are transit via PVG or NRT. - in Y
PVG is 772 & NRT 767
PVG is overnight flight. Not worth upgrading to Prem Econ.
NRT -day flight. Maybe worth trying for a J upgrade
Your thoughts?
#13
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NZ
Programs: NZ Gold, BA Gold, QF Silver, IHG Platinum Elite Ambassador, Accor Diamond
Posts: 1,048
Feeling a little "underwhelmed" for options early next week to get to Busan at short notice.
Options are transit via PVG or NRT. - in Y
PVG is 772 & NRT 767
PVG is overnight flight. Not worth upgrading to Prem Econ.
NRT -day flight. Maybe worth trying for a J upgrade
Your thoughts?
Options are transit via PVG or NRT. - in Y
PVG is 772 & NRT 767
PVG is overnight flight. Not worth upgrading to Prem Econ.
NRT -day flight. Maybe worth trying for a J upgrade
Your thoughts?
The other alternative is Air China via SYD/PEK
If you're committed to NZ, do NRT as a day flight. On 767 it isn't bad with the 2-3-2 seating esp if you can get a bulkhead, and bid for an upgrade.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WLG/BKK
Programs: TG*G, NZ*GE, QF G, Accor Gold
Posts: 10,196
Presuming you don't want to take the obvious non-Star option of flying Korean, you can fly OZ (Asiana) via Sydney and get a high speed train from Inchon Airport to Busan from later this month, or get a separate domestic ticket on Korean. The other disadvantage is you need to fly to SYD the night before because the flight leaves too early for an arrival from NZ.
The other alternative is Air China via SYD/PEK
If you're committed to NZ, do NRT as a day flight. On 767 it isn't bad with the 2-3-2 seating esp if you can get a bulkhead, and bid for an upgrade.
The other alternative is Air China via SYD/PEK
If you're committed to NZ, do NRT as a day flight. On 767 it isn't bad with the 2-3-2 seating esp if you can get a bulkhead, and bid for an upgrade.
I flew WLG-SYD-ICN on QF (the SYD-ICN was OZ metal and QF codeshare) and was easy in the same day, which was required in my case (you could fly NZ/OZ). Alternative was WLG-AKL-ICN(KE), similarly possible same day.
For PUS, don't forget that a number of carriers fly into PUS such as TG, CX etc. Not sure how this goes from a cost perspective though. The KTX (train) is extremely efficient, so don't discard this.
Really, it all depends on what you are trying to achieve...
Having been here (ICN) for 2 months, Korea has its great, and not-so-great, points. Balance is favourable so far though!
Cheers, TK