CHC Regional Transfer Short Cut
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wellington
Programs: QFWP (LTSG), NZ (Jade), TG ROP (Forgotten), OZ (Silver), AA (Cardboard), EK (Lowest of the Low)
Posts: 4,669

On Tuesday I was in CHC for 1 hour and went to the main lounge, no scanner before security.
On exit of the Koru Club I noticed a sign saying Regional Transfer and pointed left. This took me to a manned Help Desk by the Emergency Exit, the glass doors by the escalators towards the Regional Terminal, who manually let me out through the glass doors. It cuts about 5 minutes, depending on walking speed, to get to the regional gates.
This was the first time I noticed this, but have not been in the CHC Koru for 4 months as I try to avoid transiting through CHC but it eliminates one of my gripes about the new CHC, which is terrible traffic flow through the terminal.
I really think the designers just did a very poor job think through the entire passenger process.

On exit of the Koru Club I noticed a sign saying Regional Transfer and pointed left. This took me to a manned Help Desk by the Emergency Exit, the glass doors by the escalators towards the Regional Terminal, who manually let me out through the glass doors. It cuts about 5 minutes, depending on walking speed, to get to the regional gates.
This was the first time I noticed this, but have not been in the CHC Koru for 4 months as I try to avoid transiting through CHC but it eliminates one of my gripes about the new CHC, which is terrible traffic flow through the terminal.

#2
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Programs: Air NZ Gold Elite, Qantas Platinum, Emirates Gold, Flying Blue Gold
Posts: 102
I used this short cut last time I used CHC earlier this month. There was an announcement in the Koru Lounge about this. It was said that this short cut is a trial. If it is a question of usage then I hope enough of use use the facility to justify it becoming permanent. I think it requires that the exit door is manned so I suppose they perhaps need the numbers to justify the cost.
#7
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: NZ Koru
Posts: 6,365
#9
Join Date: Nov 2012
Programs: NZ GE, QF
Posts: 361
I agree. The Christchurch lounge was a great idea, but was very poorly done and has thus failed. I hope they do a better job with the Auckland one, with a "proper lounge" with decent seating, and reasonable food and drink. Why should regional passengers get treated like third class citizens?
#10
was cakiwi
Join Date: Jan 2013
Programs: DL, UA
Posts: 479
Couldn't disagree more. It is not and was never portrayed to be a lounge replacement....it is an alternative and if you want the full service/offering, a 5 minute detour is not that much to ask. I find it is a perfect spot to grab a quick cup of tea before a flight without needing to go upstairs. it is like being disappointed that a regional plane doesn't offer the same as a jet service. What were you expecting?
#11
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New Zealand
Programs: NZ*E & DL Minion. Former QF & EK
Posts: 166
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wellington
Programs: QFWP (LTSG), NZ (Jade), TG ROP (Forgotten), OZ (Silver), AA (Cardboard), EK (Lowest of the Low)
Posts: 4,669
The Birdcage is not much different from the new regional lounge model that we have. Against the main lounge it is definitely inferior but it was never supposed to be on par. I do not understand the third class citizens comment, you are second class third class are the people looking into the "protective bubble".
However connecting regional to regional it is not a 5 minute detour, it is far longer as you need to go through security and the full walking circuit is not 5 minutes. The short cut has reduced it from main lounge to regional gates to be under 5 minutes but the main lounge is definitely not an option for a comfortable experience if you have less than an hour between regional transfers IMO.
However connecting regional to regional it is not a 5 minute detour, it is far longer as you need to go through security and the full walking circuit is not 5 minutes. The short cut has reduced it from main lounge to regional gates to be under 5 minutes but the main lounge is definitely not an option for a comfortable experience if you have less than an hour between regional transfers IMO.
#13
was cakiwi
Join Date: Jan 2013
Programs: DL, UA
Posts: 479
The Birdcage is not much different from the new regional lounge model that we have. Against the main lounge it is definitely inferior but it was never supposed to be on par. I do not understand the third class citizens comment, you are second class third class are the people looking into the "protective bubble".
However connecting regional to regional it is not a 5 minute detour, it is far longer as you need to go through security and the full walking circuit is not 5 minutes. The short cut has reduced it from main lounge to regional gates to be under 5 minutes but the main lounge is definitely not an option for a comfortable experience if you have less than an hour between regional transfers IMO.
However connecting regional to regional it is not a 5 minute detour, it is far longer as you need to go through security and the full walking circuit is not 5 minutes. The short cut has reduced it from main lounge to regional gates to be under 5 minutes but the main lounge is definitely not an option for a comfortable experience if you have less than an hour between regional transfers IMO.
A saying I am often reminded of is that you don't often know ir truly appreciate what you have got until it is gone.
Most of the people who aren't able to enter the 'birdcage' would love to yet apparently some of those who can still don't think it is good enough.
#14
Join Date: Sep 2010
Programs: Air NZ Gold Elite
Posts: 133
The birdcage is often crowded, and the offerings are not that good.
Also, it's impossible to take a client in when travelling regional. For those of us who take large numbers of regional flights, and don't want to spend the time (a lot more than 5 minutes) walking to the other end of the airport, and getting through security, it is a substandard product.
The idea of a stripped back satellite lounge is a good one. But the execution and standard of the CHC one is below par.
Also, it's impossible to take a client in when travelling regional. For those of us who take large numbers of regional flights, and don't want to spend the time (a lot more than 5 minutes) walking to the other end of the airport, and getting through security, it is a substandard product.
The idea of a stripped back satellite lounge is a good one. But the execution and standard of the CHC one is below par.
#15
Join Date: Nov 2012
Programs: NZ GE, QF
Posts: 361
Well put Blackcloud. It's almost like the way some people post here that they are expecting some sort of royal welcome. Anytime away from home for me, from my nearest and dearest is by default not my first option of how to spend my time, so any creature comforts aka benefits that I am given, I am appreciative of.
A saying I am often reminded of is that you don't often know ir truly appreciate what you have got until it is gone.
Most of the people who aren't able to enter the 'birdcage' would love to yet apparently some of those who can still don't think it is good enough.
A saying I am often reminded of is that you don't often know ir truly appreciate what you have got until it is gone.
Most of the people who aren't able to enter the 'birdcage' would love to yet apparently some of those who can still don't think it is good enough.
Regional passengers do not deserve lesser treatment than jet passengers. We usually pay more for our flights, often lots more. Of course we get smaller planes, with lesser service, but there is no reason for a considerably worse experience at the airport. I don't mind a cut down lounge, but the CHC one is too cut down. A good concept but not well executed. And it does take quite a bit of time to get to the main Koru lounge in both AKL and CHC, and lots of time to get to your flight. The best lounge in this regard is WLG, which is well suited for everyone.