Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air New Zealand | Air Points
Reload this Page >

Now Pay for exit rows - "Fly Customised"

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Now Pay for exit rows - "Fly Customised"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2012, 2:06 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Programs: NZ*GE / EK*GOLD
Posts: 2,510
So excess baggage is going through the roof yet again too????
Rebound is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 2:56 am
  #47  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,338
Yup... reckon that's it with NZ...

I travel for target shooting competitions... and as a Gold I can take 2 x 23kg bags to (say) LAX in Y.. right?

NOW however, even if my bags are under 23kg.. and one is a gun case...the gun case will cost me $200 extra..

Total B.S.:mad

Even madder now...

Go to the Seat Select FAQ's... The one about "Why have we introduced Seat Select..."

Bald faced LIE.... "No existing seating entitlements are being taken away"

REALLY? Then why can't I just pick an exit row for free now?

Last edited by trooper; Nov 20, 2012 at 3:05 am
trooper is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 3:09 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NZ
Programs: AA, UA, QF, TK, EY, NZ
Posts: 447
Originally Posted by kiwi_norway
If it's the full row to yourself, then this seems like a VERY generous benefit, but I doubt that's the case.
Well the question I ask is how full are the flights usually - full enough to deny anyone a row of seats to themselves?

It shouldn't be that hard for Air NZ to do - I assume they would look like someone who paid for the whole skycouch anyway from having it printed on the boarding pass etc so I think they'll just fill the back (and middle block of the forward section) up completely before touching the skycouch rows.. Air NZ needs less than 200 people in Y (80%) to start denying users use of the whole skycouch because there'd be someone else on the block of 3. So you take 200 as a base, add maybe 5 people who get skycouches.. Which means you have a maximum possible allowance of 15, if it's done the way it 'should' - to allow for G/GE/KC to use the skycouch. Add one more passenger and that'll reduce to 14 and so on.. That's how I see it anyway.
ANZ787900 is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 3:30 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,338
Anyone know how to make the online question form WORK?

No matter what I do nothing I type in anywhere seems to register (When I hit "Continue" it tells me to put in First Name, Last Name etc)
trooper is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 3:48 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: AKL
Programs: NZ*S, UA, WN
Posts: 13
Been lurking for awhile, here's my thoughts on the new fees...

So what will be the long-term impact of these changes? Despite a bunch of FFers getting annoyed, will NZ realize increased profit? UA has endless little fees and charges, are they better off for it? Unfortunately, I think the answer is yes, but it will be interesting to see in this case.

However, NZ has (or had) a much better brand to protect than UA. Maybe some of their C/F long haul cabins are nice, but from my perspective as a mostly-Y traveler, they offer a poor product and seem to exist mostly on the benefits of their FF program. NZ has great staff service, a really good on-board product and a bunch of top-quality lounges around the world. It is different, I think, when a premium brand such as NZ descends into copying the business model of lower-quality competitors. Yes, it may work for UA and others, but is it right for NZ?

Organizations with respected brands have to tread very carefully. Netflix customers were stunned and angry with the changes last year, not just at the price increase, but the way it made their whole relationship "messy" with the company and burst a lot of users' bubbles with the firm.

If it makes them more profitable in the end, then I guess we can't really object, but I for one would like to see an organization succeed but standing their ground and not just going down the same path as everyone else. People will pay for a premium brand, but when you nickel-and-dime them, you make it very clear that you're (no longer) such a brand.
baldingeagle is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 4:23 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NZ
Programs: NZ Gold, BA Gold, QF Silver, IHG Platinum Elite Ambassador, Accor Diamond
Posts: 1,048
£ worth the same as the NZ$?

I can understand selling priority seating to non-G/GEs, but to block G and GEs from pre-selecting on purchase is rather outrageous. You would have thought at least a bit of intelligence would have left GEs alone, allow NZ Golds to pre-select a week out, and even give NZ Silvers 24 hours.

However I chose to take a look at the price schedule on the NZ based website:

http://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/seat-select

compared to the UK one:

http://www.airnewzealand.co.uk/seat-select

and see a peculiar set of inconsistencies. No charge for selecting standard seats on domestic flights if UK based.

However, the craziest one is that NZ thinks it can extort the same nominal amount in £ from UK based customers as it does in NZ$ from NZ ones. £75 or NZ$75 for an exit row? The same mind numbing stupidity as OneUp treating a £200 bid as very weak but a NZ$200 one as average on the bidding gauge.

Nevermind, as BA Silver I get pre-selection for free at the point of booking across OneWorld.
libertyuk is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 4:44 am
  #52  
formerly kiwi_norway
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London, UK
Programs: A3*G, NZ*S, Avis PC
Posts: 390
Originally Posted by libertyuk
However, the craziest one is that NZ thinks it can extort the same nominal amount in £ from UK based customers as it does in NZ$ from NZ ones. £75 or NZ$75 for an exit row?
Holy crap! Now that I DON'T like! But even worse, the "preferred seating" is only $30 NZ, vs. £50 UK! That's a 325% increase in cost, just cause you're UK based! That's outrageous!
FlyingFilmGuy is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 5:24 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Programs: BA Gold, NZ*G
Posts: 204
Originally Posted by ANZ787900
Which means you have a maximum possible allowance of 15, if it's done the way it 'should' - to allow for G/GE/KC to use the skycouch. Add one more passenger and that'll reduce to 14 and so on.. That's how I see it anyway.
They won't allocate free skycouches to Koru members.
craver is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 5:31 am
  #54  
formerly kiwi_norway
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London, UK
Programs: A3*G, NZ*S, Avis PC
Posts: 390
Comparison of Seat Select pricing in different markets:

Comparison of Seat Select pricing in different markets:

* Converted into $NZ at today's exchange rates
* List is separated as "NZ / AU / UK / EU / US / CA / JP / HK / CH"
* Cheapest rate in Underline. Priciest in Bold.

Domestic New Zealand:
Standard - $5.00 / NC / NC / NC / NC / NC / NC / NC / NC
Preferred - $10.00 / $6.36 / $19.49 / $23.51 / $12.24 / $12.28 / $4.51 / $4.74/ $4.90
Exit Row - $10.00 / $6.36 / $19.49 / $23.51 / $12.24 / $12.28 / $4.51 / $4.74 / $9.81


Tasman & Pacific:
Standard - $5.00 / $12.72 / NC / NC / NC / NC / NC / NC / NC
Preferred - $20.00 / $25.44 / $19.49 / $23.51 / $12.24 / $12.28 / $10.53 / $4.74 / $9.81
Exit Row - $20.00 / $25.44 / $19.49 / $23.51 / $12.24 / $12.28 / $10.53 / $9.47 / $19.61
Bassinet Row - $20.00 / $25.44 / $19.49 / $23.51 / $12.24 / $12.28 / $10.53 / $4.74 / $19.61


Long-haul International:
Standard - NC for all
Preferred - $30.00 / $38.16 / $97.45 / $94.03 / $61.17 / $61.38 / $30.08 / $31.57 / $39.23
Exit Row - $75.00 / $95.39 / $146.17 / $133.21 / $91.76 / $92.08 / $75.20 / $94.70 / $98.07
Bassinet Row - $25.00 / $31.80 / $48.72 / $47.02/ $30.59 / $30.69 / $22.56 / $31.57 / $29.41
FlyingFilmGuy is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 5:41 am
  #55  
formerly kiwi_norway
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London, UK
Programs: A3*G, NZ*S, Avis PC
Posts: 390
Some observations from the pricing table:
  • The only people to pay a Standard seat fee on Domestic NZ flights are NZ residents. Everyone else listed as "No Charge".
  • Only NZ and AU residents pay a Standard seat fee on Tasman and Pacific sectors. Everyone else is listed as "No Charge".
  • For domestic sectors, the Preferred and Exit Row seats are the same fee in all territories, except in China where you pay twice as much for Exit Row as for Preferred.
  • On Tasman and Pacific sectors, the Preferred, Exit and Bassinet fees are identical in all territories, except Hong Kong, for whom an Exit Row is twice as much as the other two options, and in China for whom a Preferred seat is half the price of the other two options.
  • In Hong Kong, a Bassinet is the same price as a Preferred seat. In all other territories a Bassinet is cheaper.
  • On Tasman and Pacific routes, Australians have the rawest deal (priciest fees).
  • On long-haul routes, the UK / EU have the priciest fees (by a BIG margin).
  • The biggest territorial fee discrepancy is on Tasman and Pacific routes, where Hong Kong residents pay just 18.6% of the fee that Australians do for Preferred or Bassinet seating.

Last edited by FlyingFilmGuy; Nov 20, 2012 at 6:02 am
FlyingFilmGuy is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 7:54 am
  #56  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Programs: BA Gold, NZ*G
Posts: 204
Thanks for putting the table together kiwi_norway, and interesting observations! I wonder whether NZ put as much effort into implementation as you did into putting this together.
craver is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 8:07 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: ATL
Posts: 186
Originally Posted by kiwi_norway
Some observations from the pricing table:
Indeed, nice work on the table!

I'm guessing that to some extent prices are based on competitive analysis of similar offerings in the particular market (you'd hope so at least, otherwise I'm not sure what the marketing folks are actually doing!). For example, here are the rates on VS ex UK in economy (source):

Extra Legroom Seats
UK to Los Angeles/Las Vegas: GBP35/USD60

Exit Row Seats
UK to Las Vegas/Los Angeles GBP80/USD130

And I believe VS elites are not exempt at all from these fees, but if anyone has contrary experience/details please correct me.

So it's at least possible from a cursory comparison in one market with one airline that NZ have put some thought into their pricing.

Last edited by PacificTwo; Nov 20, 2012 at 8:12 am Reason: typo
PacificTwo is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 8:33 am
  #58  
formerly kiwi_norway
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London, UK
Programs: A3*G, NZ*S, Avis PC
Posts: 390
Originally Posted by craver
Thanks for putting the table together kiwi_norway, and interesting observations! I wonder whether NZ put as much effort into implementation as you did into putting this together.
To be honest, the BIGGEST thing that surprises me about this announcement (more so than the move to charge for premium seating) is the blatant discrepancy in pricing for different markets.

I would maybe expect 10-20% fee difference based on floating exchange rates following an initial fee structure being set, but to have fees in one territory that are 5x that of another?!?!?!?!?! Come on!

(Of course, there's every chance I've got my math wrong, or the currency converter was lying to me.)
FlyingFilmGuy is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 8:41 am
  #59  
formerly kiwi_norway
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London, UK
Programs: A3*G, NZ*S, Avis PC
Posts: 390
Originally Posted by PacificTwo
Indeed, nice work on the table!

I'm guessing that to some extent prices are based on competitive analysis of similar offerings in the particular market (you'd hope so at least, otherwise I'm not sure what the marketing folks are actually doing!). For example, here are the rates on VS ex UK in economy (source):

Extra Legroom Seats
UK to Los Angeles/Las Vegas: GBP35/USD60

Exit Row Seats
UK to Las Vegas/Los Angeles GBP80/USD130

And I believe VS elites are not exempt at all from these fees, but if anyone has contrary experience/details please correct me.

So it's at least possible from a cursory comparison in one market with one airline that NZ have put some thought into their pricing.
But these VS prices are relatively similar in the different currencies (3% difference for Exit Row and 7% difference for Legroom). Also, a quick check of their foreign sites (I just checked China and South Africa) shows the same prices displayed, in the same currencies, (GBP and USD) for various markets.

I completely agree that NZ would have put some thought into their pricing. I just don't agree with the outcome of that thought process.
FlyingFilmGuy is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2012, 11:39 am
  #60  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Zealand/ UK
Programs: NZ, EK, QF, SQ.
Posts: 776
Originally Posted by wayoutwest
Moan Moan moan, all you do is moan.
This is all for the good of the service NZ can offer flyers. They keep fares down by keeping the "extras" paid for
They do not keep fares down! I can consistently get cheaper fares from EK, SQ, TG for my return flights AKL-LHR-AKL.

In addition, If I buy flights from the UK to NZ, they are cheaper than buying them from New Zealand. In other words, LHR-AKL-LHR costs less than AKL-LHR-AKL. For my next journey, I will be buying a one-way AKL-LHR (not with NZ) and then purchasing LHR-AKL-LHR when I get to the UK. I travel this route often enough to be sure of using the return ticket.

I am forced to fly NZ within New Zealand, because no other airline services my town, but I never get the super-cheap flights advertised for flights such as AKL-WLG.

Last edited by celle; Nov 20, 2012 at 11:45 am
celle is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.