AF and KL order (more) A350 (joint order)
In Dutch: https://www.luchtvaartnieuws.nl/nieu...0-airbus-a350s
For KL, the A350 will replace the A330 and B772. Edit: for AF as well |
https://onemileatatime.com/news/air-...m-airbus-a350/
In english too This is good news! I am now wondering if the B772 are really going into retrofit soon or not? maybe not all of them! |
Replacing the A330 and B772 doesn't necessarily mean the first ones in the door will be displacing those older frames. Or they could displace the A330s first, then use the A350s for growth before finally retiring the 772s as the last frames come in.
|
Out of those the 772 is obviously larger from the A330, though pretty much in line with the current 359. So in terms of capacity those would be easy to swap. From a perspective of age all 772's and 332's are roughly the same (~22 years old), however, the A330's have received cabin upgrades not that long ago. The 772's have not and are on the brink of falling apart (perhaps a bit of an aggregation, but the A330's are definitely much newer).
While it is anybody's guess what AF will do, I can imagine that they would not want to retrofit the 772's for <4 years of additional service. Additionally keeping in mind that AF is due to receive new A350's from their previous order this year, I would not be surprised if they start phasing out the 772's real soon. I'd expect the A330's to be around for a bit longer as they have much more recent interior that they can probably stretch for a few more years. It won't be a competitive product but AF has plenty of routes where there is little (to no) competition that these aircraft can (and are) used. |
A330s at KL and AF have both gotten refits recently, the 777-200 at KL are supposed to be retrofitted over the next year or so but nothing announced for AFs 777-200.
I think that gives us a general idea of how they could proceed, replace AF’s old birds, then A330s etc. These don’t necessarily have to be one for one replacements either. A new A350 at KL could displace a 787 which would in turn replace the A330. There is no mention of the type either so it could be a mix of -900 and -1000. The big head scratcher for me are the 10 orphaned 787 at AF. With current orders AF’s lineup is A220-300, 787-9, A350-900. But the dreamliner fleet is very small, they are very useful for smaller secondary routes where too much capacity dumping isn’t feasible. Think current A330 routes, secondary Canada, USA, Africa etc. I wonder if we will see a small topup order from AF down the road for 5-10 more dreamliners, which would also keep the door open for a 777X order. At this rate AF might operate even more A350 than 777! |
Originally Posted by Digicola
(Post 35613291)
The big head scratcher for me are the 10 orphaned 787 at AF.
|
Originally Posted by irishguy28
(Post 35613306)
don't forget they have 13 siblings at KLM, as well as 9 bigger siblings! (787-10)
|
First AF 787 received December 2016, so maybe looking at a refit towards 2026 or so? Would it make some sense to move the Dreamliners over to KLM at that point and replace them with A350s at AF?
|
wasnt the original plan to send all dreamliners to KL and AF would have the new airbus planes ?
|
Originally Posted by fifty_two
(Post 35613349)
wasnt the original plan to send all dreamliners to KL and AF would have the new airbus planes ?
|
Originally Posted by Digicola
(Post 35613291)
A330s at KL and AF have both gotten refits recently, the 777-200 at KL are supposed to be retrofitted over the next year or so but nothing announced for AFs 777-200.
I think that gives us a general idea of how they could proceed, replace AF’s old birds, then A330s etc. These don’t necessarily have to be one for one replacements either. A new A350 at KL could displace a 787 which would in turn replace the A330. There is no mention of the type either so it could be a mix of -900 and -1000. The big head scratcher for me are the 10 orphaned 787 at AF. With current orders AF’s lineup is A220-300, 787-9, A350-900. But the dreamliner fleet is very small, they are very useful for smaller secondary routes where too much capacity dumping isn’t feasible. Think current A330 routes, secondary Canada, USA, Africa etc. I wonder if we will see a small topup order from AF down the road for 5-10 more dreamliners, which would also keep the door open for a 777X order. At this rate AF might operate even more A350 than 777! https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/35130445-post24.html |
Originally Posted by etiene
(Post 35613200)
Replacing the A330 and B772 doesn't necessarily mean the first ones in the door will be displacing those older frames. Or they could displace the A330s first, then use the A350s for growth before finally retiring the 772s as the last frames come in.
|
Originally Posted by ATLCDG
(Post 35614151)
Isn't the "Optimise 328 Sieges" the annouced cabin upgrade of the rest of the 777-200 fleet?
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/35130445-post24.html It’s quite refreshing to have so much investment going on in the fleet these days, feels like no costs have been spared unlike in the past where it was patchwork after patchwork. |
Well apparently Ben Smith is making me eat my words.
https://www.lesechos.fr/industrie-se...-smith-1981526 Recapped from another forum, someone here with access to les echos might be able to confirm but:
Reminder, this is all from a recap I’ve read elsewhere. Hope someone here can confirm or deny and that I didn’t break all the forum rules. Most surprising thing for me here is that the A350-900 will be the smallest widebody in the AF fleet! Must be expecting quite some growth in the « niche » markets like Ottawa and Quebec. |
Originally Posted by Digicola
(Post 35615108)
Most surprising thing for me here is that the A350-900 will be the smallest widebody in the AF fleet! Must be expecting quite some growth in the « niche » markets like Ottawa and Quebec.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:53 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.