Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Need advice to prevent mile expiry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2018, 11:36 am
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,362
Originally Posted by carnarvon
I cannot imagine anyone refusing a long haul biz class ticket gift because of a stopover in a modern and safe airport with good biz lounge.
So, presumably, you cannot possibly understand why direct flights tend to be priced much higher than indirect flights, then? I just do not understand why somebody would have to justify themselves for not accepting a substitution to something they regard as inferior. It is their business why they do not want to take an indirect flight.

Where does that gift story come from, incidentally? The OP has not spoken of a gift, has he, or have I missed that?
NickB is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2018, 12:21 pm
  #17  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 733
Originally Posted by carnarvon
Why ?

Going through CDG in biz is not that bad, so let me guess.

You sold the tickets to the people you mentioned.

They were sold a direct flight and rightfully refuse your new routing.

Had it been a gift, the people in question would have been unbelievably rude and arrogant to refuse a biz class ticket from ATH to JFK because there was a "oh dear Lord, good grace, mamamia" a ....... STOPOVER!!!

What a nighmare. A stopover!

Sorry for my being sarcastic but I cannot imagine anyone refusing a long haul biz class ticket gift because of a stopover in a modern and safe airport with good biz lounge.
In my original post, I missed the number "4" before "people" - as in " I booked ATH-JFK for 4 people in J "...me being one of those people, and my wife and kids being the other 3.
Secondly, it is not just a stopover, but a much earlier departure which required an overnight stay in ATH, not part of my plan. It would have required extending the trip by one day...which, as a self-employed professional, would have resulted in significant loss of income for me and others...when one employs 10 people who cannot work when he is not there, extending vacations by one day is a big deal.

I am happy to tell everyone that FB did the honorable thing. They accepted the cancellation and extended expiry by 3 months from today. I thought it was reasonably fair to all involved.
Now I get to complain (I put a different word but FT filter automatically changed it to "..." :0 ) about the fact that Skyteam has no availability to any of the destinations on any of my future travel dates, but what else is new
stevento is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2018, 12:34 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,362
Originally Posted by stevento
I am happy to tell everyone that FB did the honorable thing. They accepted the cancellation and extended expiry by 3 months from today. I thought it was reasonably fair to all involved.
^ Excellent. Glad to see that common sense and fairness has prevailed at FB.
NickB is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2018, 12:35 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CPT,AMS
Posts: 4,410
Originally Posted by stevento
Secondly, it is not just a stopover, but a much earlier departure which required an overnight stay in ATH, not part of my plan. It would have required extending the trip by one day...which, as a self-employed professional, would have resulted in significant loss of income for me and others...when one employs 10 people who cannot work when he is not there, extending vacations by one day is a big deal.
Did you try and ask, before cancelling, whether or not they will accommodate you on different flights which would work better for you? e.g. the afternoon ATH-CDG flight which would have still get you same day to JFK, or AZ via FCO etc.

Originally Posted by stevento

I am happy to tell everyone that FB did the honorable thing. They accepted the cancellation and extended expiry by 3 months from today. I thought it was reasonably fair to all involved.
That's good to hear...
Ditto is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2018, 12:39 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: France
Programs: FB Plat for Life, UAMP, BAEC, Accor ALL Platinum, Marriott silver, Hilton, Meliá silver.
Posts: 3,117
Got it.

Now if I may say, you have been very picky.

You may not have realised that finding 4 biz award seats is no easy task.

I may not know your particulars, but think you should have persued the matter differently, by looking into other routings, other flights or even marginally amend your trip.
carnarvon is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2018, 12:44 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: France
Programs: FB Plat for Life, UAMP, BAEC, Accor ALL Platinum, Marriott silver, Hilton, Meliá silver.
Posts: 3,117
Originally Posted by Ditto
Did you try and ask, before cancelling, whether or not they will accommodate you on different flights which would work better for you? e.g. the afternoon ATH-CDG flight which would have still get you same day to JFK, or AZ via FCO etc.
Indeed. There are many different combinations via 3 hubs.
carnarvon is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2018, 1:29 pm
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 733
Originally Posted by carnarvon
Got it.

Now if I may say, you have been very picky.

You may not have realised that finding 4 biz award seats is no easy task.

I may not know your particulars, but think you should have persued the matter differently, by looking into other routings, other flights or even marginally amend your trip.
I am not new to award redemptions.

We always travel with our teenage kids, 4-5 times a year, always during school breaks, never with any time flexibility, usually to places much farther than Athens, and always in J or F, so I am very well aware of difficulties of finding 4 award seats. That's why we always book our trips well in advance.
All I was asking FB to do is to give me an opportunity to use these miles for a different trip, which they did. I thought it was reasonable on both ends. Not sure how I should have persued (sic) it differently.

And you don't know my particulars, but I would imagine you woudn't take kindly to your boss telling you to take an unpaid day off because he had to make a connection somewhere. I've had to do it on a missed connection once...it doesn't make anyone happy...

Last edited by stevento; Jan 19, 2018 at 1:31 pm Reason: My apologies for snarkiness, I didnt notice you were from France. I wouldn't want to put my French to your English :)
stevento is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2018, 1:53 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,697
Originally Posted by NickB
In substance, what you are saying is that an airline is entirely entitled to substitute an indirect ATH-CDG-JFK itinerary to a direct ATH-JFK and an individual would be forced to accept that substitution. Do you really believe that this is the case?
Not at all; and nowhere did I say that. Airlines are free to alter their schedules and plans, even when passengers have already booked on that flight, and in such cases, leeway should be shown to the passenger to try and accommodate them in the most suitable way possible, but if no such suitable arrangement can be found, then they should be allowed to cancel their ticket.

Which is exactly what happened here. The passenger was refunded - though they apparently neglected to give a viable credit card/bank account in which to receive the cash element refund, just as they were unable to offer a viable FB account in which to receive a mileage refund.

Originally Posted by NickB
Yet, this is precisely what happens here: what is being returned is that no longer edible leg of lamb.
Sounds like you bought your Christmas turkey from Tesco UK.

Originally Posted by NickB
This is a non sequitur. The question is not what causes miles to expire (anymore than the question would be in my example what causes meat to rot) but whether restituting expired miles constitutes a valid refund.
The OP was offered an alternate; presumably they tried negotiating for other alternates; they instead chose to go for a partial refund, which in this very particular set of circumstances included foregoing all miles.
irishguy28 is online now  
Old Jan 19, 2018, 3:23 pm
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,362
Originally Posted by irishguy28
Not at all; and nowhere did I say that.
Did you not? You tell us that the situation would be similar to the understudy analogy and that such as situation "does not lead to an automatic right to a refund." Now, think this through, saying that a passenger has no automatic right to a refund, this means that the airline has no obligation to refund. What does that mean if not that the airline can substitute an indirect service to a direct one and force the passenger to accept it (since the passenger has no right to a refund)?

Sounds like you bought your Christmas turkey from Tesco UK.
Not very likely. Quite apart the fact that I was not in the UK, the likelihood of my buying a turkey for Christmas is very remote. To me, this is one of the most boring, bland and uninteresting poultry there is and I would not have the slightest desire to eat it at Xmas, still less serve it to my guests, even if it came from Provenance, Ginger Pig or Turner & George rather than Tesco .
NickB is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2018, 6:52 am
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,697
Originally Posted by NickB
Did you not? You tell us that the situation would be similar to the understudy analogy and that such as situation "does not lead to an automatic right to a refund."
And my next sentence was:

Originally Posted by irishguy28
And besides, the analogy falls down further in that the OP was not denied the refund.
You've done my work for me, though. The "theatre ticket" analogy is not an analogy at all!
irishguy28 is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.