Did AF bury its A380 too quickly ?

Old Aug 31, 23, 8:33 am
  #1  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,593
Did AF bury its A380 too quickly ?

Having revived one earlier this year, LH will reinstate 8 more until next year.
It was such a wonderful aircraft. Was AF too fast when deciding to remove them from its fleet ?
flyertalker00143 is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 8:48 am
  #2  
Hilton 25+ BadgeMarriott 10+ Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 4,122
Originally Posted by macaron35
Having revived one earlier this year, LH will reinstate 8 more until next year.
It was such a wonderful aircraft. Was AF too fast when deciding to remove them from its fleet ?
I'm biased in my opinion as I really like the plane - but yes it was too early in my books. Seeing how full planes are at times, it would have helped to relieve the situation. However it most probably was not financially viable.
Miss it these days when passing through CDG, while LH and BA can't get enough of it (although BA seems to be having lots of technical issues with them) but despite this, they seem to be keeping it for the coming years as they plan to renew the cabins soon.

Cheers!
miles4CDG and becks1 like this.
nldogbert is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 9:23 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: France
Programs: FB Plat for Life, UAMP, BAEC, Accor ALL Platinum, Marriott silver, Hilton, Meli silver.
Posts: 3,034
Originally Posted by macaron35
(...) Was AF too fast when deciding to remove them from its fleet ?
In one word : yes!

When AF got rid of them ("because of Covid"), they made the French state pay for it.....

Mind you, AF cancels LH flights because of lack of aircraft when they could have revived their A380 as LH and all others are doing.

The problem is that AF is "une Grande Dame". Quite arrogant in their corporate culture. The French government forced AF's hand to make them order this plane.

So Covid was a perfect excuse to ask the French government for a bailout and get rid of this plane they never wanted in the first place.

Sad for us pax and sad for taxpayers (but in France, taxpayers' interests are not factored in when making decisions on how to waste money).
carnarvon is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 9:59 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: FRA/SXB
Programs: FB Gold
Posts: 1,629
Perhaps, but the cost of refurbishing the A380s might have been too much, as they were long overdue for it.

Don't get me wrong, I loved the plane and flew it quite a few times. But financially not sure it was viable even today.
Th1erry0 likes this.
mlin32 is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 10:12 am
  #5  
ofj
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: DTW, IST, ESB
Programs: AF/KLM Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 275
Originally Posted by carnarvon

Sad for us pax and sad for taxpayers (but in France, taxpayers' interests are not factored in when making decisions on how to waste money).
Same story in every country, hah! I did read that the F/J cabins on the AF a380s were of the previous generation. In that case, refurbishing a majority of the cabin would've probably been cost prohibitive.
Warriorconcept likes this.
ofj is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 10:26 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,247
Many airlines reinstated the A380 because they did not have to completely redo an antiquated seating configuration.
brunos is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 10:40 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: FRA/SXB
Programs: FB Gold
Posts: 1,629
Originally Posted by brunos
Many airlines reinstated the A380 because they did not have to completely redo an antiquated seating configuration.
LH didn't have the capacity on the short term as the Boeing 77X keeps getting pushed back, and their outdated 2-2-2 J cabine wasn't slated for replacement. Hence, the A340 and A380 were brought back as a stopgap measure.

The AF A380 had a good F product but the dreaded NEV4 J product and an antiquated Y cabine. To refurb such a large aircraft......yeah doesn't work.
mlin32 is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 12:10 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: France
Programs: FB Plat for Life, UAMP, BAEC, Accor ALL Platinum, Marriott silver, Hilton, Meli silver.
Posts: 3,034
Refurbishing the A380 cabin doesn't work for AF but works for other airlines.

AF is refurbishing its 77W. Why not thrown them away then?

Come on...
makin'miles and Deckter like this.
carnarvon is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 12:49 pm
  #9  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,593
Even BA is refurbishing its 12 aircrafts and is looking to acquire 6 more to use them over the next decade.
flyertalker00143 is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 1:07 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,618
Originally Posted by macaron35
Even BA is refurbishing its 12 aircrafts and is looking to acquire 6 more to use them over the next decade.
BA is so strapped for lift, and the 380 fleet so prone to tech issues, it cannot spare even one example to go get refurbished. All 12 are scheduled to the limit, and scarcely a day passes when one or two are unready for duty resulting in cancellations. I am not sure BA wants to expand a really problematic fleet, but may be driven to it if the snakebit 77X program remains on delay.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 4:02 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: France
Programs: FB Plat for Life, UAMP, BAEC, Accor ALL Platinum, Marriott silver, Hilton, Meli silver.
Posts: 3,034
Originally Posted by BearX220
BA is so strapped for lift, and the 380 fleet so prone to tech issues, it cannot spare even one example to go get refurbished. All 12 are scheduled to the limit, and scarcely a day passes when one or two are unready for duty resulting in cancellations. I am not sure BA wants to expand a really problematic fleet, but may be driven to it if the snakebit 77X program remains on delay.
Is this a BA issue or an A380 issue?

SQ, QF and if course EK (to name a few) are using, updating and refurbishing their A380 without known repeated tech issues, so is the A380 the issue at BA?
carnarvon is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 8:01 pm
  #12  
LMF
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 25
I enjoyed flying AF#7 JFK-CDG A380 on several occasions in the Y cabin. There was a small Y cabin upstairs and if you sat in the emergency exit row had quite a bit of legroom.

Sorry to see the AF 380s disappear but I know senior management (CEO Ben Smith) could not wait to get rid of them.

Had very fond memories of them.
LMF is offline  
Old Aug 31, 23, 9:34 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SEA once more (previously CDG and NRT)
Programs: Former DL DM and UA 1k, now a J class free agent (UA Plat, AA Plat, DL Silver)
Posts: 2,443
Originally Posted by carnarvon
Refurbishing the A380 cabin doesn't work for AF but works for other airlines.

AF is refurbishing its 77W. Why not thrown them away then?

Come on...
The 777W is a much easier aircraft for airlines to integrate into their operations than the A380. Sales figures are pretty conclusive on that. Deliveries of 832 vs 251.

Air France never really wanted the A380, but ordered it for political reasons. The 77W was something Air France really wanted (IIRC, they were the launch customer for it).
SEA-Flyer is offline  
Old Sep 1, 23, 2:52 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: AMS
Programs: BAEC Silver, Flying Blue Gold, TK M&S Nobody
Posts: 2,206
Big difference between refurbishing an aircraft that you want to keep long term and refurbishing one that you don't.
etiene is offline  
Old Sep 1, 23, 2:57 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,247
Originally Posted by mlin32
LH didn't have the capacity on the short term as the Boeing 77X keeps getting pushed back, and their outdated 2-2-2 J cabine wasn't slated for replacement. Hence, the A340 and A380 were brought back as a stopgap measure.

The AF A380 had a good F product but the dreaded NEV4 J product and an antiquated Y cabine. To refurb such a large aircraft......yeah doesn't work.
I would disagree about F. It was an antique product. AF introduced the new La Premiere seat some eight years ago.
It is impossible to keep this 20-year old F seat while advertising the new P (and even the forthcoming one).
amexrocks likes this.
brunos is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.