La Premiere Suite (partially) revealed? [merged]
#16
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 154
I was told that the "suite" effect would be achieved through the use of curtains rather than walls. Maybe the visual used for in the new campain is even closer to the final product than we actually think...
I'm a bit worried about the material used for the upholstery. Looks exactly like my sofa and, believe, it is a stain magnet. Not sure how it would look after a few flights...
I'm a bit worried about the material used for the upholstery. Looks exactly like my sofa and, believe, it is a stain magnet. Not sure how it would look after a few flights...
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,520
I was told that the "suite" effect would be achieved through the use of curtains rather than walls. Maybe the visual used for in the new campain is even closer to the final product than we actually think...
I'm a bit worried about the material used for the upholstery. Looks exactly like my sofa and, believe, it is a stain magnet. Not sure how it would look after a few flights...
I'm a bit worried about the material used for the upholstery. Looks exactly like my sofa and, believe, it is a stain magnet. Not sure how it would look after a few flights...
#19
#20
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 🇸🇬 🇭🇰 🇫🇷
Programs: Many
Posts: 4,749
Sorry for being unclear. I was trying to say that fabrics get dirty very quickly. It is one thing to spary some detergent/bleach on plastic or leather, it is another thing to remove dirt on fabrics. I hope AF will take into conisderation that when selscting fabrics for their P suite/seat.
But maybe AF is not expecting to get so many P pax... Am I being sarcastic?
But maybe AF is not expecting to get so many P pax... Am I being sarcastic?
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,555
Sorry for being unclear. I was trying to say that fabrics get dirty very quickly. It is one thing to spary some detergent/bleach on plastic or leather, it is another thing to remove dirt on fabrics. I hope AF will take into conisderation that when selscting fabrics for their P suite/seat.
But maybe AF is not expecting to get so many P pax... Am I being sarcastic?
But maybe AF is not expecting to get so many P pax... Am I being sarcastic?
They will have their usual lot of pilots and family, French politicians and officials from a selective group of countries.
But I trust that AF know what kind of fabrics work for seats. However, a small group of design guys might decide for a colour that is more "risky" as Orbitmic pointed out.
#22
Join Date: Jun 2011
Programs: Flying Blue
Posts: 2
In this context, "suite" could equally mean "what's next" as in the evolution of P in the "palace with two wings."
#23
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Programs: FB LTPE, BAEC GGL, EK Blue, SK Gold, Marriott Amb+LTT, IHG Diamond Amb, Accorhotels Silver
Posts: 1,954
#24
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CDG/AMS
Programs: FB Plat for life, FB PC, M&M FT, Hertz President (+ many low tier cards)
Posts: 2,777
And I hope you are right, I am not a big fan of travelling in a box, albeit a luxury box. I love the loungy spacious feel of the current P cabin. More privacy when sleeping, great, but I hope the loungy concept is not going over board.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,520
Fundamentally, from how I interpret what l'agentsecret is saying, AF is simply proposing to do the same with curtains instead of the sliding doors, and to be honest, I can't see any advantage in doing that while I can see multiple downsides, such as:
(1) I fear it may look less clean (if only because curtains are fabric),
(2) it is also the case that a closed curtain is precisely never as open as an open sliding door (ie the closed curtain takes space while a well done sliding door disappears inside the main seat side)
(3) curtains are not 'neat' as we can see from those which serve as cabin dividers, they move, protrude, don't always close properly, etc.
So my fear is that having a suite where you effectively replace a sliding door by a curtain would likely to feel even more claustrophobic for people who do not like to close the suite, and less neat and tidy for those who do, although of course, I'll hope to be favourably impressed when olivedel posts photos on 7 May!
#26
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Programs: FB LTPE, BAEC GGL, EK Blue, SK Gold, Marriott Amb+LTT, IHG Diamond Amb, Accorhotels Silver
Posts: 1,954
Do you have any particular seat in mind when you say that though? All the suite seats I know (at least what I would call suite seats ie which can be closed) offer optional privacy through (often automated) sliding doors, so there is never any "obligation" to be in a box if you prefer to leave the door open and in my experience some people do. I'm not aware of any seat where passengers would be imposed a claustrophobic environment.
But the separations are way lower from SQ suites from what I saw in Trip Reports.
Now the pressure is in me... Hopefully I can access FT while I will be in the press conference!
#27
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CDG/AMS
Programs: FB Plat for life, FB PC, M&M FT, Hertz President (+ many low tier cards)
Posts: 2,777
Do you have any particular seat in mind when you say that though? All the suite seats I know (at least what I would call suite seats ie which can be closed) offer optional privacy through (often automated) sliding doors, so there is never any "obligation" to be in a box if you prefer to leave the door open and in my experience some people do. I'm not aware of any seat where passengers would be imposed a claustrophobic environment.
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,555
Apart from AF I've only been in P on SQ A380, so there may be "best of both worlds" offerings I'm not aware of. On SQ you don't have a free spacious view accross the cabin, also not when you leave the doors and blinds to the isle open. With the doors left open it's a box which is sort of half open to one side. I agree with you that they are not claustrophobic (In the sense that for example BA J seats can be). In addition, the SQ suites are massively more luxurious than AF's current P offering. However, I simply like the spacious loungy feel in the AF P cabin which you defenitely don't have on SQ.
People have varied tastes and there is no point arguing about personal tastes. I do not like that people can watch the back of my head (lacking hair) or what am reading. I do not like watching other people moving around. I do not like the wind and noise next to my head on sideways, open seats. But I can understand that others like the open space feeling.
What is objective is that current AF F seats are smaller/narrower than most current F suites, like SQ 777 or most others. For example, SQ and most airlines get the 4 seats facing forward, making them much wider than the sideways AF seats. CX seats are also sideways but there are only 3 seats per row. Apparently, AF new seats will be facing forward (hence wider) but with no privacy.
#29
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CDG/AMS
Programs: FB Plat for life, FB PC, M&M FT, Hertz President (+ many low tier cards)
Posts: 2,777
Now we know who AF had in mind when they designed their F seats
People have varied tastes and there is no point arguing about personal tastes. I do not like that people can watch the back of my head (lacking hair) or what am reading. I do not like watching other people moving around. I do not like the wind and noise next to my head on sideways, open seats. But I can understand that others like the open space feeling.
What is objective is that current AF F seats are smaller/narrower than most current F suites, like SQ 777 or most others. For example, SQ and most airlines get the 4 seats facing forward, making them much wider than the sideways AF seats. CX seats are also sideways but there are only 3 seats per row. Apparently, AF new seats will be facing forward (hence wider) but with no privacy.
People have varied tastes and there is no point arguing about personal tastes. I do not like that people can watch the back of my head (lacking hair) or what am reading. I do not like watching other people moving around. I do not like the wind and noise next to my head on sideways, open seats. But I can understand that others like the open space feeling.
What is objective is that current AF F seats are smaller/narrower than most current F suites, like SQ 777 or most others. For example, SQ and most airlines get the 4 seats facing forward, making them much wider than the sideways AF seats. CX seats are also sideways but there are only 3 seats per row. Apparently, AF new seats will be facing forward (hence wider) but with no privacy.
Just one remark, what you call sideways is nothing more than a slight rotation away from the isle.
Now...on second thought. AF might be going for a hybrid solution. A open and relatively low walled experience for those who like it, and a curtain, which can be closed as far as you want for those who don't. Some very clever design features would be required to avoid making it look like a hospital...but it wouldn't be entirely idiotic, would it?
Last edited by Zembla; May 2, 2014 at 11:20 am
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,520
I think it is possible and if so we'll need to wait and see because it may not be idiotic at all - or... Let's put it that way, AF have sadly had a record or really problematic seats and others that have made relative sense, so les paris sont ouverts!!