"Somewhat scary one near Winnipeg" - The AC Master Incidents Thread
#3886
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: YVR - MILLS Waypoint (It's the third house on the left)
Programs: AC*SE100K, wood level status in various other programs
Posts: 6,216
I wonder how long before this bird is in regular service.
Doesn't Transport Canada need to issue a C of A first?
Doesn't Transport Canada need to issue a C of A first?
#3887
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: Bottom feeder Star Gold
Posts: 2,652
The CofA for the individual aircraft was issued as it emerged from the factory. It reminds valid, even if out of service. A qualified mechanic's signature in the aircraft logbooks is all that's required to formalize the repair(s) and return it to service with no Transport input. By virtue of the fact it flew to Toronto, we know it's airworthy and can safely assume that AC maintenance staff cleared it to leave the HAECO facility. I may be mistaken, but don't believe anything further is necessary to stuff people in it and charge them money.
#3888
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: YVR - MILLS Waypoint (It's the third house on the left)
Programs: AC*SE100K, wood level status in various other programs
Posts: 6,216
The CofA for the individual aircraft was issued as it emerged from the factory. It reminds valid, even if out of service. A qualified mechanic's signature in the aircraft logbooks is all that's required to formalize the repair(s) and return it to service with no Transport input. By virtue of the fact it flew to Toronto, we know it's airworthy and can safely assume that AC maintenance staff cleared it to leave the HAECO facility. I may be mistaken, but don't believe anything further is necessary to stuff people in it and charge them money.
#3891
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC SEMM / HH Diamond
Posts: 3,154
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/CFITW
#3893
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,443
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...rst-77-455730/
Investigators probing an Air Canada Boeing 777-300ER tail-strike at Hong Kong have disclosed that the landing was the pilot’s first on the 777, outside of a simulator.
Investigators probing an Air Canada Boeing 777-300ER tail-strike at Hong Kong have disclosed that the landing was the pilot’s first on the 777, outside of a simulator.
#3894
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: Bottom feeder Star Gold
Posts: 2,652
I wonder what previous aircraft types the first officer has flown, and if AC's initial type training includes unusual-attitude recovery in the flare.
#3895
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...rst-77-455730/
Investigators probing an Air Canada Boeing 777-300ER tail-strike at Hong Kong have disclosed that the landing was the pilot’s first on the 777, outside of a simulator.
Investigators probing an Air Canada Boeing 777-300ER tail-strike at Hong Kong have disclosed that the landing was the pilot’s first on the 777, outside of a simulator.
I noticed that both FlightGlobal and Aviation Herald had posts on the Dec 11 AC 15 talk strike. There was no new news.
The line about the FO's first landing on type was in the HK Preliminary Report that I posted upthread on Jan 10
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/30639401-post3782.html
#3896
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Incident: Canada A333 at Geneva on Feb 10th 2019, black smoke from engine
By Simon Hradecky, created Wednesday, Feb 13th 2019 22:41Z, last updated Wednesday, Feb 13th 2019 22:41Z
An Air Canada Airbus A330-300, registration C-GHKR performing flight AC-835 from Geneva (Switzerland) to Montreal,QC (Canada), was climbing out of Geneva's runway 22 when tower advised there was black smoke coming out of the left engine (Trent 772). The crew stopped the climb at 7000 feet and advised they wanted to return to Geneva, upon being handed off to approach for the return the crew declared PAN PAN and requested vectors while running the checklists. The aircraft returned to Geneva for a safe landing on runway 22 about 45 minutes after departure.
The flight was cancelled.
The occurrence aircraft remained on the groung for about 25 hours, then positioned to Montreal as flight AC-2035.
By Simon Hradecky, created Wednesday, Feb 13th 2019 22:41Z, last updated Wednesday, Feb 13th 2019 22:41Z
An Air Canada Airbus A330-300, registration C-GHKR performing flight AC-835 from Geneva (Switzerland) to Montreal,QC (Canada), was climbing out of Geneva's runway 22 when tower advised there was black smoke coming out of the left engine (Trent 772). The crew stopped the climb at 7000 feet and advised they wanted to return to Geneva, upon being handed off to approach for the return the crew declared PAN PAN and requested vectors while running the checklists. The aircraft returned to Geneva for a safe landing on runway 22 about 45 minutes after departure.
The flight was cancelled.
The occurrence aircraft remained on the groung for about 25 hours, then positioned to Montreal as flight AC-2035.
#3897
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Incident: Canada A321 near Toronto and Vancouver on Jan 31st 2019, ELACerrate
By Simon Hradecky, created Wednesday, Feb 13th 2019 21:11Z, last updated Wednesday, Feb 13th 2019 21:16Z
An Air Canada Airbus A321-200, registration C-FGKZ performing flight AC-119 from Toronto,ON to Vancouver,BC (Canada) with 190 passengers and 6 crew, was climbing out of Toronto when the crew received multiple ECAM messages including "ELAC 1 FAULT", "RIGHT AILERON FAULT", "LEFT AILERON FAULT". The crew worked the related checklists and successfully reset the ELAC (Elevator and Aileron Computer). Later into the flight, while the aircraft was in US Airspace, the failures returned however. The crew declared emergency with US ATC reporting the loss of ailerons and decided to continue the flight to Vancouver. On approach to Vancouver the crew declared PAN PAN and continued for a safe landing.
The Canadian TSB reported maintenance replaced ELAC #1 and ELAC #2 , subsequent tests showed the system serviceable. A service difficulty report was filed with Transport Canada.
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...110Z/CYYZ/CYVR
By Simon Hradecky, created Wednesday, Feb 13th 2019 21:11Z, last updated Wednesday, Feb 13th 2019 21:16Z
An Air Canada Airbus A321-200, registration C-FGKZ performing flight AC-119 from Toronto,ON to Vancouver,BC (Canada) with 190 passengers and 6 crew, was climbing out of Toronto when the crew received multiple ECAM messages including "ELAC 1 FAULT", "RIGHT AILERON FAULT", "LEFT AILERON FAULT". The crew worked the related checklists and successfully reset the ELAC (Elevator and Aileron Computer). Later into the flight, while the aircraft was in US Airspace, the failures returned however. The crew declared emergency with US ATC reporting the loss of ailerons and decided to continue the flight to Vancouver. On approach to Vancouver the crew declared PAN PAN and continued for a safe landing.
The Canadian TSB reported maintenance replaced ELAC #1 and ELAC #2 , subsequent tests showed the system serviceable. A service difficulty report was filed with Transport Canada.
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...110Z/CYYZ/CYVR
#3898
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Incident: Jazz DH8D at Toronto on Jan 25th 2019, engine door sneaked off
Simon Hradecky, created Tuesday, Feb 12th 2019 22:17Z, last updated Tuesday, Feb 12th 2019 22:17Z
A Jazz Aviation de Havilland Dash 8-400, registration C-GGMU performing flight QK-8946 from Toronto,ON to Saint John,NB (Canada), was accelerating for takeoff from Toronto's runway 24R when the left hand engine outboard cowl door separated from the nacelle and struck the left wing leading edge causing damage to the de-icing boots. The crew remained unaware of the occurrence, there were no abnormal engine or other system indications nor were there any engine vibrations. The aircraft continued to destinaton for a safe landing.
The Canadian TSB reported the missing door was noticed only after the aircraft had parked at the terminal. The door was found on runway 24R in Toronto. The operator's maintenance had performed a pre-flight inspection of the engine including engine oil quantity checks in the area of the missing cowl. The operator is investigating.
Transport Canada's Airworthiness reported: "Another aircraft was dispatched to operate the outbound flight. Company Maintenance Personnel and a replacement Door were on the aircraft. Prior to flight, a Service Check and Oil Check were carried out by CYYZ Maintenance, the aircraft overnighted in CYYZ. The Operator inspected the door and found all latches in the locked position with no obvious damage to any of them. The door support strut was missing. CYYZ was advised about the missing strut. They confirmed they had done a full sweep and runway inspection with no sign of the strut. TSB was notified. A Service Difficulty Report (SDR) was submitted. Maintenance issued a Maintenance Safety Alert to all Maintenance Personnel. The Aircraft was returned to service following replacement of the Door and L/H Inboard Leading Edge Assembly. This is the first event of this type for this Operator; however, there have been other similar events with other operators of this aircraft Type. Additionally, Bombardier released Service Bulletin (SB) which includes installing a placard to each cowl door describing (via symbols) the procedures for properly closing the door. All Jazz aircrafts will have this SB completed if not previously done."
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...325Z/CYYZ/CYSJ
Simon Hradecky, created Tuesday, Feb 12th 2019 22:17Z, last updated Tuesday, Feb 12th 2019 22:17Z
A Jazz Aviation de Havilland Dash 8-400, registration C-GGMU performing flight QK-8946 from Toronto,ON to Saint John,NB (Canada), was accelerating for takeoff from Toronto's runway 24R when the left hand engine outboard cowl door separated from the nacelle and struck the left wing leading edge causing damage to the de-icing boots. The crew remained unaware of the occurrence, there were no abnormal engine or other system indications nor were there any engine vibrations. The aircraft continued to destinaton for a safe landing.
The Canadian TSB reported the missing door was noticed only after the aircraft had parked at the terminal. The door was found on runway 24R in Toronto. The operator's maintenance had performed a pre-flight inspection of the engine including engine oil quantity checks in the area of the missing cowl. The operator is investigating.
Transport Canada's Airworthiness reported: "Another aircraft was dispatched to operate the outbound flight. Company Maintenance Personnel and a replacement Door were on the aircraft. Prior to flight, a Service Check and Oil Check were carried out by CYYZ Maintenance, the aircraft overnighted in CYYZ. The Operator inspected the door and found all latches in the locked position with no obvious damage to any of them. The door support strut was missing. CYYZ was advised about the missing strut. They confirmed they had done a full sweep and runway inspection with no sign of the strut. TSB was notified. A Service Difficulty Report (SDR) was submitted. Maintenance issued a Maintenance Safety Alert to all Maintenance Personnel. The Aircraft was returned to service following replacement of the Door and L/H Inboard Leading Edge Assembly. This is the first event of this type for this Operator; however, there have been other similar events with other operators of this aircraft Type. Additionally, Bombardier released Service Bulletin (SB) which includes installing a placard to each cowl door describing (via symbols) the procedures for properly closing the door. All Jazz aircrafts will have this SB completed if not previously done."
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...325Z/CYYZ/CYSJ