![]() |
I class - redefining math?
I just witnessed the oddest thing. A domestic flight is scheduled with a 319. This starts out with J=9 C=9 I=9 on, for example, seat counter. I watched a flight go to I=0 C=0 J=2. I then watched it go back to C=2 J=6. Now a 319 has 14 J seats. This means that 8 of them are presently full. By my count, that means I should be 1, not 0, but it is I=0 on seatcounter. If I=0 is correct, then it should have started with I=8, not I=9 as it did. Assuming that all seats in J are actually booked in I, that would mean that 8 of them are booked in I resulting in I = 9-8 = 1. Do seats not go back into I once they've come out?
|
The answer is not necessarily.
Depending on demand, etc. for that flight, an I or D booking that is cancelled does not necessarily go back to I or D, respectively. |
So yes, the redefined math. Excellent. :)
|
Originally Posted by pmax
(Post 7164205)
I then watched it go back to C=2 J=6. Now a 319 has 14 J seats. This means that 8 of them are presently full.
C is a subset of J, so J6C2 means there are 6 seats left, 2 of which they are willing to sell at the C fare. |
Originally Posted by ChrisA330
(Post 7164472)
That's not quite how the inventory works.
C is a subset of J, so J6C2 means there are 6 seats left, 2 of which they are willing to sell at the C fare. 14 - 6 = 8 seats available, not 6+2 = 8. |
The numbers next to the booking class bucket does not necessarily indicate the number of seats remaining.
|
Originally Posted by Rejuvenated
(Post 7164895)
The numbers next to the booking class bucket does not necessarily indicate the number of seats remaining.
Edited to add: assuming that the # is less than <9 |
I is an interesting thing. I have seen many flights a good month or more out where they show J9 C9 I0 to asia, probably one of the reasons they created I. I have also seen flights showing J9 C9 I8 to asia only a few days out. It is a lost caused trying to figure out how it works. As far as I see it, C is a subset of J, and I is a subset of C.
|
Originally Posted by shore9
(Post 7167797)
As far as I see it, C is a subset of J, and I is a subset of C.
|
It's late in the workday, and all this talk of redefining math got me thinking:
Let S be a number representing seats up front S = AJ + BC + DI Where A, B, and D are real-valued constants >= 0 Now assume J, C, and I to be complex variables (Ir + iIc), which are initially purely real. A rotation of I by 90 degrees (or pi/2, if you prefer) will make I purely imaginary, and all D seats in I will be (i.D.Ic), thus not real and not able to be booked. Assume there are N 319s in service, R of which are refurbished. Given that I have yet to see one of these "refurbished planes", it can be also assumed that these R 319s are imaginary, and thus composed of imaginary seats while (N-R) 319s have seats which are purely real. Since all stories indicate the new J seats are angled slightly, and that the refurbished planes are imaginary, it can be assumed that the collective angle of the seats in J will add up to 90 degrees (pi/2), thus making the total number of seats S on a plane purely imaginary, and suggesting the number of refurbished planes (R) might be a complex term (Rr + iRc). If we treat all the seats in all N planes as a group, by adding or subtracting refurbished J seats we effectively change the total angle of the seats and thus the number of real and imaginary seats. (for example, if half a plane is refurbished, the collective angle is 45 degrees, and thus half the seats should be real. Since J and C are more likely to be purely real numbers (which is possible but not discussed here), this means I is most heavily affected by the addition of new J seats. So the likely cause is somebody just put in a new J suite on the assembly line and you'll have to wait until after lunch when they put another seat in before the numbers change. |
Originally Posted by MapleLeaf
(Post 7167916)
Nope, that is not the way it works.
|
Originally Posted by DJ Bitterbarn
(Post 7168128)
It's late in the workday, and all this talk of redefining math got me thinking:
Let S be a number representing seats up front S = AJ + BC + DI Where A, B, and D are real-valued constants >= 0 Now assume J, C, and I to be complex variables (Ir + iIc), which are initially purely real. A rotation of I by 90 degrees (or pi/2, if you prefer) will make I purely imaginary, and all D seats in I will be (i.D.Ic), thus not real and not able to be booked. |
Originally Posted by ChrisA330
(Post 7164912)
AC doesn't oversell J, so for J it actually does indicate the # of seats remaining.
SmilingBoy. |
Originally Posted by SmilingBoy
(Post 7168284)
I can't believe that this is true. Overselling makes perfect sense, especially in the business class cabin where a lot of people have flexible tickets and are likely not to show up.
|
Originally Posted by zorn
(Post 7168473)
The consequences involved in p!ssing off such a very expensive ticket holder by not being able to give them a seat in J are perhaps too great to make overbooking that cabin worthwhile.
SmilingBoy. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.