FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Air Canada | Aeroplan (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan-375/)
-   -   Try for SE or change to another FF program. (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan/547752-try-se-change-another-ff-program.html)

parnel Apr 14, 2006 4:55 am

[QUOTE=yyzprincess]

I have flown SQ J & F within Asia, the product IMHO is not that much different from the product say SFO-HKG.
If that's true then I'll pass on taking SQ across the Pacific. I took severaliner Asia flights on SQ over the last two years in both F and J and saw nothing that impressive.



The equipment in most part the same.Some of the equipment continues on to NA.
Each flight I was on was configred fro shorter haul flying.

ACORD Apr 14, 2006 7:47 am

Have you considered getting status on OneWorld as well as * Alliance?

If you travel a lot to Asia, the cities and routes you frequent the most will dictate which airline makes the most sense to get status on. For instance, if your base is HKG then you'll really want Cathay status (even Silver @ 30K status miles gives you lounge access). If you travel to MNL the *Alliance is pretty useless as you need to take crazy routes to get there and still earn status miles. If your base is BKK or SIN then *Alliance makes sense.

BTW -- I find Air Canada just as good as CX, SQ and TG crossing the Pacific when travelling in J.

yyzprincess Apr 14, 2006 7:56 am


Originally Posted by yvrcnx
I will have a YVR-SIN-MNL and MNL-SIN-YVR in September/October on SQ which should help to get the 20 additional sectors needed within the next 12 month.


Advise take time to map out your PPS sectors. You will be handsomely rewarded.
I spent weeks researching the PPS program.
Below Best way to get Max PPS Sectors:
...........
...........

yyzprincess Apr 14, 2006 8:14 am

[QUOTE=parnel]

Originally Posted by yyzprincess

If that's true then I'll pass on taking SQ across the Pacific. I took severaliner Asia flights on SQ over the last two years in both F and J and saw nothing that impressive.

Each flight I was on was configred fro shorter haul flying.

You have posted this negative opinon of SQ International product several times on this forum.No other poster including myself has responded or replied to your post(s) about SQ product on this or other forums , in a rude & offensive language.


It is unfortunate, you have not extended the same courtesy to those of us who dare to express negative opinion of AC product.
Many of these posters have been subjected to your rude offensive replies; most of the said posters are not UA apologist. They are members of AC/AE FFP.

Simon Apr 14, 2006 8:16 am

What does this diatribe have to do with Parnel's original post??! :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

parnel Apr 14, 2006 8:20 am

[QUOTE=yyzprincess]

Originally Posted by parnel

You have posted this opnion of SQ International product several times on this forum.Noone including myself has made any rude or offensive remark.

It is unfortunate, you have not extended the same courtesy to those of us who dare to express negative opinion of AC product.
Many that have been subjected to your rude offensive posts are not UA apologist. They are members of AC/AE FFP.


blah blah blah and always off topic

yyzprincess Apr 14, 2006 8:26 am


Originally Posted by Q Shoe Guy
If you are flying from KIX/NGO/FUK there won't be any international cabin, just regional. As none of the flights from those airports go to NA!

Yes, I saw that no F to KIX.

parnel Apr 14, 2006 8:33 am


Originally Posted by yyzprincess
Yes, I saw that no F to KIX. That is why I have not finalized my trip.
I am hoping I can meet the individual in Tokyo.
If I cannot, I may have to bite the bullet & go to ICN to pickup SQ to YVR.
I guess getting closer to lifetime PPS wins over taking a non stop flight
KIX- LAX/YVR/SFO


Why is this post and the others on SQ on the AC board? It has nothing, zero,zilch,nada to do with AC.

yyzprincess Apr 14, 2006 8:36 am


Originally Posted by parnel
Why is this post and the others on SQ on the AC board? It has nothing, zero,zilch,nada to do with AC.

Respond to QS. I did not see you ask the same question from QS.

parnel Apr 14, 2006 8:38 am


Originally Posted by yyzprincess
Respond to QS. I did not see you ask the same question from QS.

Did I not say "and others"

yyzprincess Apr 14, 2006 8:38 am


Originally Posted by parnel

If that's true then I'll pass on taking SQ across the Pacific. I took severaliner Asia flights on SQ over the last two years in both F and J and saw nothing that impressive.
Each flight I was on was configred fro shorter haul flying.

Why is this post here?

"It has nothing, zero,zilch,nada to do with AC"

parnel Apr 14, 2006 8:44 am


Originally Posted by yyzprincess
Why is this post here?

"It has nothing, zero,zilch,nada to do with AC"

Beacuse no matter what when BS gets posted it needs to be addressed....my oint still sticks; your post and many others here have nothing to do with the AC board or the airline.

acysb87 Apr 14, 2006 8:51 am

[QUOTE=yyzprincess]

Originally Posted by parnel

You have posted this opnion of SQ International product several times on this forum.Noone including myself has made any rude or offensive remark.

It is unfortunate, you have not extended the same courtesy to those of us who dare to express negative opinion of AC product.
Many that have been subjected to your rude offensive posts are not UA apologist. They are members of AC/AE FFP.


What was rude or offensive in this particular post you are referencing?he mentioned that he would take a pass.I am confused on this one.

yyzprincess Apr 14, 2006 9:23 am

[QUOTE=acysb87]

Originally Posted by yyzprincess


What was rude or offensive in this particular post you are referencing?he mentioned that he would take a pass.I am confused on this one.

Nothing.
Maybe I should clarify my posting .
I was just comparing and pointing out the negative postings by Parnel about SQ's Product and the way it was received on this AC forum to when negative opinions of AC product are posted by the members of this FT Board who in most cases are not UA apologists but AC: SE,E,P only these posters are subjected to rude offensive responses from Parnel.

I have edited.

Simon Apr 14, 2006 9:38 am

Maybe instead you should stick to discussing AC/AE points and miles rather than particular posters.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.