A321XLR Signature Class suites, CR9/E75 and 787/777 refreshes (M. Nasr interview)
#31
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,313
I certainly don't know (was just proposing a hypothetical), but I suspect AC has the data.
#32
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ideally YOW, but probably not
Programs: AC SE*MM
Posts: 1,826
I also don't think I've sat in PY with an empty seat next to me in many years. The cabin is always completely full on the routes I fly (almost all international), and I believe it has been enormously successful for AC - which makes the A321 decision even more perplexing.
#33
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,607
I also don't think I've sat in PY with an empty seat next to me in many years. The cabin is always completely full on the routes I fly (almost all international), and I believe it has been enormously successful for AC - which makes the A321 decision even more perplexing.
#34
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,646
I think there is a bit of a mix but having followed a few routes, the PY cabin has had few/no seats left prior to the upgrade window opening... and if you look at PY fares transatlantic they used to be in the $800 range per direction. They are now double that - a sure indication that AC is able to move the seats.
#35
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: YEG
Posts: 3,925
It would seem difficult to market a 2-2 PY cabin when the aircraft is flying in North America and I am curious as to how you think they might market it? AA is reconfiguring their A321's that were used on transcon routes where they had F (1-1), J (2-2), and Y (3-3). 2-2 is marketed as J on domestic, transborder, and sun routes, so it what would be done if the XLR is put on those routes? I see it as a pretty big challenge from a marketing and fleet utilisation perspective if it was J, PY, and Y (although I am sure it could be done).
#36
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: YOW
Programs: AC SE, FOTSG Platinum
Posts: 5,725
I am convinced that fewer than 1% of all AC elites have any idea that these factors exist.
Last edited by YOWgary; May 28, 2023 at 5:36 am
#37
Join Date: May 2023
Location: YUL find me in Montreal
Programs: Air Canada SE, Bonvoy Gold, Hotels.com Gold
Posts: 668
How often are you flying and seeing the aircraft go out with empty PY seats? I genuinely can't remember seeing empty PY seats at all in my flying in 2023.
Granted I don't fly as much as many on here, but I'd estimate my sample size this year is probably > 20 flights on AC aircraft with PY cabins.
Granted I don't fly as much as many on here, but I'd estimate my sample size this year is probably > 20 flights on AC aircraft with PY cabins.
That is, until they moved a lady up from row 40-something close to landing time so that she would have a better chance of making a connecting flight.
#38
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,313
If I pay the $300 surcharge for a lie-flat, clearly the lie-flat (and accompanying service) is worth more to me than $300. And wide-body PY is generally cheaper than narrow-body J on a given route.
If I book YVR-YYZ-VIE, I don't even get a $300 refund if they do the same swap.
But what if I'm booked on a 788 in PY and it gets swapped for a XLR? Equipment swaps when booked in PY have always been an issue, but if they had actually done this in a way that all PLH routes would have Signature J, PY, and Y, on all types, then they could have mostly eliminated it.
#39
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I'm From Here
Programs: AC*SE & MM/*Wood Gold/HHonors Diamond/Marriott Silver/AirMiles Gold
Posts: 4,567
I also don't think I've sat in PY with an empty seat next to me in many years. The cabin is always completely full on the routes I fly (almost all international), and I believe it has been enormously successful for AC - which makes the A321 decision even more perplexing.
#40
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,802
But what if I'm booked on a 788 in PY and it gets swapped for a XLR? Equipment swaps when booked in PY have always been an issue, but if they had actually done this in a way that all PLH routes would have Signature J, PY, and Y, on all types, then they could have mostly eliminated it.
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,646
#42
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Programs: AC*SE
Posts: 1,924
I think there is a bit of a mix but having followed a few routes, the PY cabin has had few/no seats left prior to the upgrade window opening... and if you look at PY fares transatlantic they used to be in the $800 range per direction. They are now double that - a sure indication that AC is able to move the seats.
#43
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: TK *G
Posts: 3,099
On aircrafts with PY cabin, I pay for at least PY, unless it’s something like YYZ-YUL, because sitting in Y on those aircrafts would be painful. If I somehow end up on an A321XLR in the future, I may have to pay for J.
I am not sure if most people pay for PY because they like the product, or they are simply avoiding Y.
I am not sure if most people pay for PY because they like the product, or they are simply avoiding Y.
#44
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Ottawa, Canada + Edinburgh, Scotland
Programs: AC SE, Star Alliance Gold
Posts: 798
I often buy PY and definitely think of it as just avoiding Y. It feels much like what Y used to be like in the 1980s and 1990s, before seats got narrower and cabins denser.
#45
Join Date: May 2020
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC SE, AA PlatPro, Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy Plat & LT Gold, Hilton Gold, National EE
Posts: 878