Air Canada apologizes after barring passenger flying to see terminally ill husband
#1
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Air Canada apologizes after barring passenger flying to see terminally ill husband
Air Canada apologizes after barring passenger from flying to U.S. to see terminally ill husband
"Airline said 'unfortunate situation' was due to a misinterpretation of complex border rules during pandemic"
Sophia Harris CBC News Posted: Jun 17, 2020 4:00 AM ET | Last Updated: 7 hours ago
QUOTES:
"But when Musclow tried to check in for her May 24 flight from Kelowna to Cleveland, she said an Air Canada agent told her the U.S. border was closed to Canadians, and wouldn't let her board the plane.
"I was so upset because we had three months — my husband has three months [to live] and I wanted to go over there and be with him," said Musclow."
****
"Musclow booked her flight with United Airlines, but Air Canada was the carrier for the first leg of the trip from Kelowna to Washington D.C. She said when she purchased her ticket by phone, a United agent assured her that she could fly to the U.S. as a Canadian citizen.
According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Canadian travellers can currently fly to the U.S. as long as they haven't visited Brazil, China, Iran, Ireland, the U.K. or 26 European countries in the Schengen Area 14 days prior.
But Musclow said the Air Canada agent at the Kelowna airport told her she needed written permission to travel to the U.S., and wouldn't issue her a boarding pass.
Musclow said she consulted a second Air Canada agent at the airport who told her that if the airline let her enter the U.S., the U.S. government would fine her $1,000."
Full article:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/air...-cbp-1.5613826
"Airline said 'unfortunate situation' was due to a misinterpretation of complex border rules during pandemic"
Sophia Harris CBC News Posted: Jun 17, 2020 4:00 AM ET | Last Updated: 7 hours ago
QUOTES:
"But when Musclow tried to check in for her May 24 flight from Kelowna to Cleveland, she said an Air Canada agent told her the U.S. border was closed to Canadians, and wouldn't let her board the plane.
"I was so upset because we had three months — my husband has three months [to live] and I wanted to go over there and be with him," said Musclow."
****
"Musclow booked her flight with United Airlines, but Air Canada was the carrier for the first leg of the trip from Kelowna to Washington D.C. She said when she purchased her ticket by phone, a United agent assured her that she could fly to the U.S. as a Canadian citizen.
According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Canadian travellers can currently fly to the U.S. as long as they haven't visited Brazil, China, Iran, Ireland, the U.K. or 26 European countries in the Schengen Area 14 days prior.
But Musclow said the Air Canada agent at the Kelowna airport told her she needed written permission to travel to the U.S., and wouldn't issue her a boarding pass.
Musclow said she consulted a second Air Canada agent at the airport who told her that if the airline let her enter the U.S., the U.S. government would fine her $1,000."
Full article:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/air...-cbp-1.5613826
#3
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: YVR - MILLS Waypoint (It's the third house on the left)
Programs: AC*SE100K, wood level status in various other programs
Posts: 6,171
But I agree that, even the rules are constantly changing, airline ticket / gate staff need to be better trained.
#5
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,186
It seems like pretty clear-cut breach of contract to incorrectly refuse transport, and I'm sure the passenger would win in court. But what would they get... a refund? Maybe cab fare to and from the airport for when they didn't fly?
#6
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,889
As mentioned above, the training would have addressed this. Any chance this person was not a Canadian citizen as different rules apply. (Just trying to understand why the screw up, not make excuses.)
As per https://www.ezbordercrossing.com/cor...travel-issues/
As per https://www.ezbordercrossing.com/cor...travel-issues/
#7
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,384
That's because the entire refusal of transport section is around scenarios where it's the passenger's fault, i.e. drunk, medically unfit without medical approval, etc.
It seems like pretty clear-cut breach of contract to incorrectly refuse transport, and I'm sure the passenger would win in court. But what would they get... a refund? Maybe cab fare to and from the airport for when they didn't fly?
It seems like pretty clear-cut breach of contract to incorrectly refuse transport, and I'm sure the passenger would win in court. But what would they get... a refund? Maybe cab fare to and from the airport for when they didn't fly?
A passenger who was prevented from boarding due to agent error (agent asserted a visa was required when it was not) was not able to reclaim associated costs.
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,186
Interesting you bring this up. There's a small claims case that's relevant to this: https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bccrt/d...&resultIndex=3
A passenger who was prevented from boarding due to agent error (agent asserted a visa was required when it was not) was not able to reclaim associated costs.
A passenger who was prevented from boarding due to agent error (agent asserted a visa was required when it was not) was not able to reclaim associated costs.
I can't believe that even in court (or arbitration or whatever) AC would adhere to their obviously incorrect position on the necessity of a visa.
#10
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,202
Interesting you bring this up. There's a small claims case that's relevant to this: https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bccrt/d...&resultIndex=3
A passenger who was prevented from boarding due to agent error (agent asserted a visa was required when it was not) was not able to reclaim associated costs.
A passenger who was prevented from boarding due to agent error (agent asserted a visa was required when it was not) was not able to reclaim associated costs.
#11
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,186
At the small claims level, isn't there some expectation that the judge is going to be looking out for things like this, because self-representation is expected, and most people don't know anything about the law?
#12
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: Does Non Rev count?
Posts: 586
Very sad that the incompetence of the ground staff caused this. I volunteer my time and personal airplane with an organization called Angel Flight and Patient Airlift Services, which provides family and patients in situations like this, free flights on private aircraft, which helps to avoid these sort of things. Hopefully she gets to see her husband soon.
#13
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Very sad that the incompetence of the ground staff caused this. I volunteer my time and personal airplane with an organization called Angel Flight and Patient Airlift Services, which provides family and patients in situations like this, free flights on private aircraft, which helps to avoid these sort of things. Hopefully she gets to see her husband soon.
Thank you for your post and especially for your volunteer work.
#14
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: *G^2, Bonvoyed, NEXUS
Posts: 3,497
I wouldn't be so sure about that. Good faith clauses are common in contracts and provide parties a reasonable level of protection against human error, which is the basis of claim in both the article and the past case. There could be reason to challenge the level of liability for errors made in good faith and for the burden of proof for the airline to demonstrate that a good faith effort was made, but the concept of the clause itself is fine and is reasonable that it is there.
#15
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: Does Non Rev count?
Posts: 586