Last edit by: Adam Smith
AC Delayed/Cancelled Flight Compensation Threads
There are several threads on compensation for delayed/cancelled flights operated by AC.
If your question is about APPR (Canadian regulations), this is the correct thread.
For information regarding which regime(s) you're eligible for compensation under, or which would be more favourable, please see: Air Canada Compensation For Delayed/Cancelled Flights
For information on claiming compensation under EU rules (a.k.a. EU261 or EC261), please see: Claiming EU261 Compensation from AC
There are several threads on compensation for delayed/cancelled flights operated by AC.
If your question is about APPR (Canadian regulations), this is the correct thread.
For information regarding which regime(s) you're eligible for compensation under, or which would be more favourable, please see: Air Canada Compensation For Delayed/Cancelled Flights
For information on claiming compensation under EU rules (a.k.a. EU261 or EC261), please see: Claiming EU261 Compensation from AC
Claiming compensation from AC under APPR (Air Passenger Protection Regulations)
#181
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: YYC-PRG/VIE
Posts: 1,885
Cancellations & Delays - Flight Rights
Last edited by YYCCL3; Jul 24, 22 at 5:07 pm Reason: adding link
#182
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YLW
Programs: AC- SE100 1MM, HH Diamond, National , Nexus/GE
Posts: 4,074
AC801 on the first leg of my DUB-YYZ-CLT trip on the 09 July 2022 departed late and arrived in Toronto Airport 4+ hours late. The text notification said this was due to Airport Limitations.
I missed my connection in Toronto Airport due to the late arrival of AC801.
On 10 July 2022, my rebooked flight with Air Canada was cancelled due to pandemic-related factors beyond our control such as industry-wide labour shortages and government entry requirements
I eventually arrived on 11 July in CLT
My compensation claim to Air Canada for AC801 DUB to YYZ was rejected as follows.
We are in receipt of your claim under the Air Passenger Protection Regulations for flight 801 on 2022-07-09. We are sorry for the delay you experienced at arrival to your final destination.
In this instance, the compensation you are requesting does not apply because the delay was caused by a safety-related issue.
We hope that we may have another opportunity to welcome you on board.
How does airport limitation become a safety issue two weeks later?
What options for compensation are available to me?
Anyone in a similar situation?
I missed my connection in Toronto Airport due to the late arrival of AC801.
On 10 July 2022, my rebooked flight with Air Canada was cancelled due to pandemic-related factors beyond our control such as industry-wide labour shortages and government entry requirements
I eventually arrived on 11 July in CLT
My compensation claim to Air Canada for AC801 DUB to YYZ was rejected as follows.
We are in receipt of your claim under the Air Passenger Protection Regulations for flight 801 on 2022-07-09. We are sorry for the delay you experienced at arrival to your final destination.
In this instance, the compensation you are requesting does not apply because the delay was caused by a safety-related issue.
We hope that we may have another opportunity to welcome you on board.
How does airport limitation become a safety issue two weeks later?
What options for compensation are available to me?
Anyone in a similar situation?
Well, at lease it was a very nicely worded response
#183
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 39,696
AC801 on the first leg of my DUB-YYZ-CLT trip on the 09 July 2022 departed late and arrived in Toronto Airport 4+ hours late. The text notification said this was due to Airport Limitations.
I missed my connection in Toronto Airport due to the late arrival of AC801.
On 10 July 2022, my rebooked flight with Air Canada was cancelled due to pandemic-related factors beyond our control such as industry-wide labour shortages and government entry requirements
I eventually arrived on 11 July in CLT
My compensation claim to Air Canada for AC801 DUB to YYZ was rejected as follows.
We are in receipt of your claim under the Air Passenger Protection Regulations for flight 801 on 2022-07-09. We are sorry for the delay you experienced at arrival to your final destination.
In this instance, the compensation you are requesting does not apply because the delay was caused by a safety-related issue.
We hope that we may have another opportunity to welcome you on board.
How does airport limitation become a safety issue two weeks later?
What options for compensation are available to me?
Anyone in a similar situation?
I missed my connection in Toronto Airport due to the late arrival of AC801.
On 10 July 2022, my rebooked flight with Air Canada was cancelled due to pandemic-related factors beyond our control such as industry-wide labour shortages and government entry requirements
I eventually arrived on 11 July in CLT
My compensation claim to Air Canada for AC801 DUB to YYZ was rejected as follows.
We are in receipt of your claim under the Air Passenger Protection Regulations for flight 801 on 2022-07-09. We are sorry for the delay you experienced at arrival to your final destination.
In this instance, the compensation you are requesting does not apply because the delay was caused by a safety-related issue.
We hope that we may have another opportunity to welcome you on board.
How does airport limitation become a safety issue two weeks later?
What options for compensation are available to me?
Anyone in a similar situation?
#184
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YLW
Programs: AC- SE100 1MM, HH Diamond, National , Nexus/GE
Posts: 4,074
Yeah, their flagrant breach of their duty of care is thing that I am really pissed about. I'll get my cancellation compensation eventually, either through CTA or the collections agency here in Germany. But them not providing meal vouchers and a hotel, despite being required to do so, and having their CSRs baldly lie about it is infuriating. I've got travel insurance so I'll be made whole, but I can't forget the face of the woman next to me who apparently didn't have a credit card with her, and was told she had to sleep in the airport. I've tried contacting a couple of CA based law-firms trying to stir up interest in filing a class action suit, but have had no luck so far.
As the flying issue is well known and well-publicized with warnings and notices provided by almost all players from within and outside the travel industry, BUT we still choose to travel. Are we not now taking a known risk? If traveling on the highway and you hear on the radio of a car pile-up that is bad, you see this on your navigation system as well as on your phone (I know bad to do) and yet continue to travel through. Are you not now taking a risk. Perhaps that was not the best example as I quickly write this. I could have used an insurance example as they are great in avoiding paying claims also, lol
We know Covid is an excuse that is used for everything. I have Hiltons in the same city saying covid prevents an airport shuttle at one location, but they have an airport shuttle at another Hilton location. My favorite is the executive lounge is closed but the regular restaurant thirty feet away is open?
Are Airlines required to compensate when the known risks are well published during this unprecedented time? We have the Federal Government continuing to have unnecessary covid practices in place, only their special science and themselves feel is necessary while the rest of the industry does not, so is this the airline fault?
One can say we are paying more for flights, thus paying more for the known risks, thus the duty of care and standard of care is even more important now!
Anyways this was a long conversation between f/f i participated in this past weekend.
I will say again, on my delayed flights, Lufthansa looked after me well, what's to claim? Air Canada also looks after me, if I am late by a couple of hours is that time worth $$$$?. Just because CATSA is short staff or have very special agents working for them or if the airport is set up inefficiently because they have special people working there too, maybe related to the special agents at CATSA, is that the airlines fault?
Lets take a stress tab and relax : )
#185
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 44
I was reading that Duty of Care statement and then thought of that other statement used often, the standard of care?
As the flying issue is well known and well-publicized with warnings and notices provided by almost all players from within and outside the travel industry, BUT we still choose to travel. Are we not now taking a known risk? If traveling on the highway and you hear on the radio of a car pile-up that is bad, you see this on your navigation system as well as on your phone (I know bad to do) and yet continue to travel through. Are you not now taking a risk. Perhaps that was not the best example as I quickly write this. I could have used an insurance example as they are great in avoiding paying claims also, lol
We know Covid is an excuse that is used for everything. I have Hiltons in the same city saying covid prevents an airport shuttle at one location, but they have an airport shuttle at another Hilton location. My favorite is the executive lounge is closed but the regular restaurant thirty feet away is open?
Are Airlines required to compensate when the known risks are well published during this unprecedented time? We have the Federal Government continuing to have unnecessary covid practices in place, only their special science and themselves feel is necessary while the rest of the industry does not, so is this the airline fault?
One can say we are paying more for flights, thus paying more for the known risks, thus the duty of care and standard of care is even more important now!
Anyways this was a long conversation between f/f i participated in this past weekend.
I will say again, on my delayed flights, Lufthansa looked after me well, what's to claim? Air Canada also looks after me, if I am late by a couple of hours is that time worth $$$$?. Just because CATSA is short staff or have very special agents working for them or if the airport is set up inefficiently because they have special people working there too, maybe related to the special agents at CATSA, is that the airlines fault?
Lets take a stress tab and relax : )
As the flying issue is well known and well-publicized with warnings and notices provided by almost all players from within and outside the travel industry, BUT we still choose to travel. Are we not now taking a known risk? If traveling on the highway and you hear on the radio of a car pile-up that is bad, you see this on your navigation system as well as on your phone (I know bad to do) and yet continue to travel through. Are you not now taking a risk. Perhaps that was not the best example as I quickly write this. I could have used an insurance example as they are great in avoiding paying claims also, lol
We know Covid is an excuse that is used for everything. I have Hiltons in the same city saying covid prevents an airport shuttle at one location, but they have an airport shuttle at another Hilton location. My favorite is the executive lounge is closed but the regular restaurant thirty feet away is open?
Are Airlines required to compensate when the known risks are well published during this unprecedented time? We have the Federal Government continuing to have unnecessary covid practices in place, only their special science and themselves feel is necessary while the rest of the industry does not, so is this the airline fault?
One can say we are paying more for flights, thus paying more for the known risks, thus the duty of care and standard of care is even more important now!
Anyways this was a long conversation between f/f i participated in this past weekend.
I will say again, on my delayed flights, Lufthansa looked after me well, what's to claim? Air Canada also looks after me, if I am late by a couple of hours is that time worth $$$$?. Just because CATSA is short staff or have very special agents working for them or if the airport is set up inefficiently because they have special people working there too, maybe related to the special agents at CATSA, is that the airlines fault?
Lets take a stress tab and relax : )
#186
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, UA Gold, Bonvoy Tit LT Sil, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond, Accor Silver
Posts: 41,013
Here's a better one:
I purchased a ticket to get me home on Saturday. Due to AC's plane breaking, or them not paying enough to attract employees, or trying to get aircraft utilization up too high, they could only get me home Sunday.
How is that me taking a risk? They have MCTs. Those MCTs are higher than typical. AC knows and sets the risk level. If they can't deliver on that, I deserve a hotel.
That being said, there is also a reason I use a credit card with trip delay insurance. I think AC is responsible (legally, morally, at fault, etc.), but that doesn't mean I'm going to assume it will be easy to deal with them.
And you could replace "AC" with any other airline you want, and my argument stands.
I purchased a ticket to get me home on Saturday. Due to AC's plane breaking, or them not paying enough to attract employees, or trying to get aircraft utilization up too high, they could only get me home Sunday.
How is that me taking a risk? They have MCTs. Those MCTs are higher than typical. AC knows and sets the risk level. If they can't deliver on that, I deserve a hotel.
That being said, there is also a reason I use a credit card with trip delay insurance. I think AC is responsible (legally, morally, at fault, etc.), but that doesn't mean I'm going to assume it will be easy to deal with them.
And you could replace "AC" with any other airline you want, and my argument stands.
#187
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 501
From what I've seen with the CTA, even if the airlines are found to be liable for care (hotel + food), the CTA can only award actual costs. So the average passenger would need to pay for the hotel and food upfront, and then if AC refuses, drag it out with the potential for a decision that they get reimbursed for their costs. And if they slept in the airport, then no reimbursement or compensation for them.
Personally, I've just been insuring the matter. I'll let insurance battle it out, or pursue the airline if actual costs exceed the known coverage limits I have. And if there ends up being weather, AC (or any airline) isn't responsible (at least within NA), and I don't really desire paying $350 for a last minute hotel room.
Personally, I've just been insuring the matter. I'll let insurance battle it out, or pursue the airline if actual costs exceed the known coverage limits I have. And if there ends up being weather, AC (or any airline) isn't responsible (at least within NA), and I don't really desire paying $350 for a last minute hotel room.
#188
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 501
AC801 on the first leg of my DUB-YYZ-CLT trip on the 09 July 2022 departed late and arrived in Toronto Airport 4+ hours late. The text notification said this was due to Airport Limitations.
I missed my connection in Toronto Airport due to the late arrival of AC801.
On 10 July 2022, my rebooked flight with Air Canada was cancelled due to pandemic-related factors beyond our control such as industry-wide labour shortages and government entry requirements
I eventually arrived on 11 July in CLT
My compensation claim to Air Canada for AC801 DUB to YYZ was rejected as follows.
We are in receipt of your claim under the Air Passenger Protection Regulations for flight 801 on 2022-07-09. We are sorry for the delay you experienced at arrival to your final destination.
In this instance, the compensation you are requesting does not apply because the delay was caused by a safety-related issue.
We hope that we may have another opportunity to welcome you on board.
How does airport limitation become a safety issue two weeks later?
What options for compensation are available to me?
I missed my connection in Toronto Airport due to the late arrival of AC801.
On 10 July 2022, my rebooked flight with Air Canada was cancelled due to pandemic-related factors beyond our control such as industry-wide labour shortages and government entry requirements
I eventually arrived on 11 July in CLT
My compensation claim to Air Canada for AC801 DUB to YYZ was rejected as follows.
We are in receipt of your claim under the Air Passenger Protection Regulations for flight 801 on 2022-07-09. We are sorry for the delay you experienced at arrival to your final destination.
In this instance, the compensation you are requesting does not apply because the delay was caused by a safety-related issue.
We hope that we may have another opportunity to welcome you on board.
How does airport limitation become a safety issue two weeks later?
What options for compensation are available to me?
#189
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YLW
Programs: AC- SE100 1MM, HH Diamond, National , Nexus/GE
Posts: 4,074
I purchased tickets on Air Canada with the knowledge that I they had a legal duty of care and with the expectation that they would not violate the law. Trust is a key part of a rules based society. I trusted that if Air Canada thought that they would be unable to comply with the law that they would cancel flights down to a level that they could maintain (see Lufthansa's shedding of tons of flights this summer as a good example of how to handle this). Air Canada instead looked at their pocketbooks, and decided that it would cost them less to break the law than to cancel flights. I intend to do everything in my power to make them reevaluate that assessment.
Here's a better one:
I purchased a ticket to get me home on Saturday. Due to AC's plane breaking, or them not paying enough to attract employees, or trying to get aircraft utilization up too high, they could only get me home Sunday.
Compensation seems so random and based on the "feelings" of the agents at that time?
How is that me taking a risk? They have MCTs. Those MCTs are higher than typical. AC knows and sets the risk level. If they can't deliver on that, I deserve a hotel.
That being said, there is also a reason I use a credit card with trip delay insurance. I think AC is responsible (legally, morally, at fault, etc.), but that doesn't mean I'm going to assume it will be easy to deal with them.
And you could replace "AC" with any other airline you want, and my argument stands.
I purchased a ticket to get me home on Saturday. Due to AC's plane breaking, or them not paying enough to attract employees, or trying to get aircraft utilization up too high, they could only get me home Sunday.
Compensation seems so random and based on the "feelings" of the agents at that time?
How is that me taking a risk? They have MCTs. Those MCTs are higher than typical. AC knows and sets the risk level. If they can't deliver on that, I deserve a hotel.
That being said, there is also a reason I use a credit card with trip delay insurance. I think AC is responsible (legally, morally, at fault, etc.), but that doesn't mean I'm going to assume it will be easy to deal with them.
And you could replace "AC" with any other airline you want, and my argument stands.
Seems as compensation is random based on the "feelings or attitude of the agent at the time" this is wrong!
Last edited by HerpaYvr; Jul 25, 22 at 3:48 pm Reason: made an error
#190
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, UA Gold, Bonvoy Tit LT Sil, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond, Accor Silver
Posts: 41,013
#191
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Programs: AC 50K, Hertz Presidents Circle, Accor Platinum, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 9,883
#192
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 22
Ac800 2hrs delayed
Hi
We flew AC800 om July 21st, 4pax in business class.
Flight was 3 hours delayed from yyz and we missed our connection with SK to ARN, got rebooked and arrived 2 days later.
I followed the plane/equipment plan for this flight on flightradar and ac website from about 24 hours before.AC800 was originally scheduled to go with C-FIUL which came in from Amsterdam as AC827.
A few hours before sched departure AC800 was changed to go with C-FIVQ which came from Montreal as AC423.
Another few hours before departure AC800 was changed to fly with C-FIVR which came in EARLY from London as AC859.(still way to late to do a turnaround within schedueled departuee)
Both C-FIVQ and C-FIVR came into YYZ so late that a turnaround according to scheduele would be impossible.
Only C-FIUL which was originally set to fly AC800 had enough time to turnaroud within the scheduele.
when ac800 started to board C-FIUL left for Rome.
This was also confirmed by the captain onboard AC800 that said the delay was due to operational decisions of changing the aircraft close to departure.
To me this looks like a clear APPR claim.
Do anyone have access to see the official AC reason for the delay?
We flew AC800 om July 21st, 4pax in business class.
Flight was 3 hours delayed from yyz and we missed our connection with SK to ARN, got rebooked and arrived 2 days later.
I followed the plane/equipment plan for this flight on flightradar and ac website from about 24 hours before.AC800 was originally scheduled to go with C-FIUL which came in from Amsterdam as AC827.
A few hours before sched departure AC800 was changed to go with C-FIVQ which came from Montreal as AC423.
Another few hours before departure AC800 was changed to fly with C-FIVR which came in EARLY from London as AC859.(still way to late to do a turnaround within schedueled departuee)
Both C-FIVQ and C-FIVR came into YYZ so late that a turnaround according to scheduele would be impossible.
Only C-FIUL which was originally set to fly AC800 had enough time to turnaroud within the scheduele.
when ac800 started to board C-FIUL left for Rome.
This was also confirmed by the captain onboard AC800 that said the delay was due to operational decisions of changing the aircraft close to departure.
To me this looks like a clear APPR claim.
Do anyone have access to see the official AC reason for the delay?
#194
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 44
From what I've seen with the CTA, even if the airlines are found to be liable for care (hotel + food), the CTA can only award actual costs. So the average passenger would need to pay for the hotel and food upfront, and then if AC refuses, drag it out with the potential for a decision that they get reimbursed for their costs. And if they slept in the airport, then no reimbursement or compensation for them.
Personally, I've just been insuring the matter. I'll let insurance battle it out, or pursue the airline if actual costs exceed the known coverage limits I have. And if there ends up being weather, AC (or any airline) isn't responsible (at least within NA), and I don't really desire paying $350 for a last minute hotel room.
Personally, I've just been insuring the matter. I'll let insurance battle it out, or pursue the airline if actual costs exceed the known coverage limits I have. And if there ends up being weather, AC (or any airline) isn't responsible (at least within NA), and I don't really desire paying $350 for a last minute hotel room.