AC 33 change; appears to no longer start in YYZ
Not sure as of what date this effective but, AC 33 appears to no longer start in YYZ. There is a flight (still wide bodied) at the same time out of YYZ that connects to AC 33 in Vancouver. This “new flight” has a different #. SearchING YYZ-SYD flight details show a connection in YVR rather than a stop. I didn’t search a lot of dates but it is certainly true mid December.
When this route commenced there was a lot of marketing and PR about the flight being YYZ-SYD direct. Curious as to why the first leg is no longer 33. |
Yes - just got a change itinerary email which perplexed me as the times were unchanged, until I noticed that AC34 (YVR-YYZ) is now AC106. Same 77L and seat selection.
And I see that AC 34 (SYD-YVR) now terminates there, and AC106 is the connecting (?same plane) onto YYZ. |
Originally Posted by Bartolo
(Post 31574622)
When this route commenced there was a lot of marketing and PR about the flight being YYZ-SYD direct. Curious as to why the first leg is no longer 33.
Could be that with AC's big push to attract traffic from the US, as well as the addition of MEL and BNE, they were seeing a lot less of the YVR-SYD seats being sold to people coming from YYZ. |
Didn't they used to feed people on the domestic portion of this flight in Y, if they were continuing to SYD?
Or is It because the flights are so often delayed, people were missing the connecting flight and wondering wth, I was on the same flight number! |
Remind me: Were you ever able to eupgrade from YYZ - SYD, or did you have two upgrade YYZ - YVR and YVR - SYD separately?
|
Originally Posted by TheCanuckian
(Post 31575434)
Remind me: Were you ever able to eupgrade from YYZ - SYD, or did you have two upgrade YYZ - YVR and YVR - SYD separately?
|
Originally Posted by Adam Smith
(Post 31574868)
Because it pissed people off to find out that their "direct" flight, which many uninitiated people assumed was non-stop, included a stop in YVR? While also creating logistical complications with eUps, seat selection, etc?
Could be that with AC's big push to attract traffic from the US, as well as the addition of MEL and BNE, they were seeing a lot less of the YVR-SYD seats being sold to people coming from YYZ. |
Originally Posted by fin 645
(Post 31575479)
It was one upgrade YYZ-SYD and if you missed it due heavy YVR bound upgrades, it was IMPOSSIBLE to upgrade YVR-SYD even if R9 on that leg. Resolving that stupidity is the biggest enhancement of splitting the flights.
I'm very glad they are making AC33/34 just YVR/SYD. |
Originally Posted by Adam Smith
Because it pissed people off to find out that their "direct" flight, which many uninitiated people assumed was non-stop
Likely in no small part because Pearson airport has added Sydney to their list of destinations served, and the distinction between 'direct' and 'non stop' service is often confused, even by industry professionals. Following such logic, most large airports could claim service to all manner of places they don't actually fly to non-stop. |
Originally Posted by rankourabu
(Post 31575237)
Didn't they used to feed people on the domestic portion of this flight in Y, if they were continuing to SYD?
Or is It because the flights are so often delayed, people were missing the connecting flight and wondering wth, I was on the same flight number! |
Originally Posted by fin 645
(Post 31575479)
It was one upgrade YYZ-SYD and if you missed it due heavy YVR bound upgrades, it was IMPOSSIBLE to upgrade YVR-SYD even if R9 on that leg. Resolving that stupidity is the biggest enhancement of splitting the flights.
R&F |
Originally Posted by run&fly
(Post 31575903)
I am assuming that if it is R9 for the YVR-SYD, waitlisted eupgrades would clear at the gate, right?
R&F |
AC has a new reservation system coming online in the fall. One of the things with the new system (at least to start) is that there will be no "thru" flights to make the system more easy to use, at least to start. You will see a big reduction in "thru-flights" in the interim, with them instead just having different flight numbers to make things easier for the system and agents.
|
Wow, end of an era in many ways.
I am nostalgic for little things, so not getting on 33 in Toronto will be a change for me in November |
Originally Posted by fin 645
(Post 31575950)
Yes, one would assume that, but you would have been waitlisted from YYZ, and that was it. Sorry, been there, done that-you could NOT be waitlisted ex YVR if originating in YYZ on 33.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:06 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.