YUL MCT inbound TK outbound AC on UA award
#2
Moderator, Air Canada; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM, FB Plat, WS Plat, BA Silver, DL GM, Marriott Plat, Hilton Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 16,743
EF shows TK connecting to anything in YUL has MCT of 2 hours.
I don't know whether that's related to TK's OTP, immigration issues typically experienced by TK's customers, or what.
I don't know whether that's related to TK's OTP, immigration issues typically experienced by TK's customers, or what.
#5
Join Date: May 2005
Location: YOW
Programs: AC-SE100K MM, BA-S HH-D, MB-G LT Sil, IHG-Plt, Nexus, Global Entry
Posts: 3,801
#6
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ideally YOW, but probably not
Programs: AC SE*MM
Posts: 1,822
Not to mention that Intl - US at YUL (and YYZ for that matter) are pretty efficient. Depending not he time of day and whether you have GE, 75 mins should be doable. If it was me I'd want to understand if my AC YUL-US flight was the last one that day for whatever destination, if there were any other options if I missed it, etc. before I got too concerned.
#7
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: YYZ most of the time
Programs: AC SE100K MM, Princess Elite
Posts: 3,921
Either way, if the airline sold it as 1 ticket, it should be their responsibility (unless the delay is at US CBP due to the OPs documents/status for entry)
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,343
When I entered TK inbound and AC outbound, I see 1hr for anything to the US since technically its an Intl-Intl choice.
Either way, if the airline sold it as 1 ticket, it should be their responsibility (unless the delay is at US CBP due to the OPs documents/status for entry)
Either way, if the airline sold it as 1 ticket, it should be their responsibility (unless the delay is at US CBP due to the OPs documents/status for entry)
Flying J. US passport, not GE or Nexus. It's an evening arrival into YUL from IST. There is one more flight after mine to my final destination. If I end up missing connection does it become UA's, TK's or AC's responsibility?
After how much time has elapsed before it goes from airline's responsibility to CBP delay?
Last edited by nas6034; Aug 24, 2019 at 8:29 pm
#9
Moderator, Air Canada; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM, FB Plat, WS Plat, BA Silver, DL GM, Marriott Plat, Hilton Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 16,743
Are we looking at different things? 60 minutes is the standard for offline, but there's an override for TK that pushes it to 2 hours. That shows up whether you search for I-I or I-D connections.
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,343
if this technically is not a legal connection should I push with UA to get me on a non stop from IST to NYC instead of connecting thru YUL? This is in J.
#11
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: YYZ most of the time
Programs: AC SE100K MM, Princess Elite
Posts: 3,921
It wouldn't surprise me if it was booked by the airline as 1hr.
Either way.... if the airline booked it as a single ticket, it "should" be their responsibility to sort out if things go wrong.
As to how long of a CBP delay would turn it from the airlines responsibility to the passengers responsibility..... that I don't know.
#12
Moderator, Air Canada; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM, FB Plat, WS Plat, BA Silver, DL GM, Marriott Plat, Hilton Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 16,743
We are looking at the same thing, and one time I look at it I agree with the TK pushing it to 2 hours, but then I look at it again (in a different frame of mind) and think.... no.... anything to the US is 1hr.
It wouldn't surprise me if it was booked by the airline as 1hr.
It wouldn't surprise me if it was booked by the airline as 1hr.
Either way.... if the airline booked it as a single ticket, it "should" be their responsibility to sort out if things go wrong.
#13
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: YVR
Programs: UA Premier Platinum
Posts: 3,759
True, but I think OP's suggestion of calling UA to argue the connection is below MCT and ask to be re-booked on a direct flight is a good one. Worst case, a few minutes are wasted and OPs has to deal with the ticket as-is. Best case, the whole question is rendered moot and OP trades a connection for a non-stop.
There have been occurrences where UA has purchased revenue seats to accommodate award ticket holders in the past (notably when they abruptly made SFO-AKL seasonal), but it's generally only in extraordinary circumstances. The degree of accommodation will also likely depend on OP's status, if any, with UA.
Of course, all this is moot if IST-EWR has available award space for the desired date.
#14
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,343
You may be right, but I should highlight the risk that having been informed that they've inadvertently given OP an illegal connection, UA forces him to change it to an even less optimal itinerary. It's an award ticket, and if there's no award space on TK IST-EWR, and the existing itinerary is illegal, UA may force him on a worse routing on UA metal (probably just a later flight out of YUL) rather than buying revenue space on TK. In my experience, if there's an option to get you to your destination on UA metal (albeit with more connections), that's likely what you'll get.
There have been occurrences where UA has purchased revenue seats to accommodate award ticket holders in the past (notably when they abruptly made SFO-AKL seasonal), but it's generally only in extraordinary circumstances. The degree of accommodation will also likely depend on OP's status, if any, with UA.
Of course, all this is moot if IST-EWR has available award space for the desired date.
There have been occurrences where UA has purchased revenue seats to accommodate award ticket holders in the past (notably when they abruptly made SFO-AKL seasonal), but it's generally only in extraordinary circumstances. The degree of accommodation will also likely depend on OP's status, if any, with UA.
Of course, all this is moot if IST-EWR has available award space for the desired date.
I am not sure if some where out there is award space but I don’t see UA having it available or else I would’ve chose the optimal connection. Would any of you know if there is a way to check if there is award space? My other choice may be that once I arrive in IST I ask them if there is space to NY directly as the MCT is not enough. Though I doubt it’ll be that easy. duly noted on trying to fix it now as UA May give a suboptimal routing.
#15
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: YVR
Posts: 2,120
Edit: never mind, my reading comprehension was off, I now see Adam Smith kindly provided the MCTs and there is an exception for non-AC-AC. Bugger.
Sorry to repurpose this thread, but I have the reverse - I wanted to book a reward with an AC-LX US-Int connection at YUL, but am being told it is impossible because it is 1 minute shy of the 90 min MCT. Is the MCT really 90 minutes?! According to the AC website US to intl at YUL should only have a 40 min MCT. Is it because the onward flight is with LX and they made up their own bogus time?! Or is this a matter of HUACA? I couldn't find a rule specific for LX - ironically if booked, this particular award would allow for a 40min connection in ZRH. The only other option to get me to YUL in time would be a redeye on a 320 to YYZ and connect from there to YUL, not terribly appealing.
Sorry to repurpose this thread, but I have the reverse - I wanted to book a reward with an AC-LX US-Int connection at YUL, but am being told it is impossible because it is 1 minute shy of the 90 min MCT. Is the MCT really 90 minutes?! According to the AC website US to intl at YUL should only have a 40 min MCT. Is it because the onward flight is with LX and they made up their own bogus time?! Or is this a matter of HUACA? I couldn't find a rule specific for LX - ironically if booked, this particular award would allow for a 40min connection in ZRH. The only other option to get me to YUL in time would be a redeye on a 320 to YYZ and connect from there to YUL, not terribly appealing.
Last edited by nomadic.relief; Aug 29, 2019 at 3:17 pm