Spend accounting for AC vs. WJ
Does anyone know if AC and WJ account for spending the same way? Reason why I ask is as follows.
I've been following Flyertalk on and off for years, never contributed anything because I'm only a semi-frequent traveler. Not the general public who mostly fly once or twice a year but also have never earned any status in the past. Changed job last year and traveling more but still nowhere near most on this forum. However, looking at the first 4 months and the remaining 8 of this year, I seem to have arrived at the following conclusion: WJ is much better for the semi-frequent domestic business travelers than AC: 1. Since Jan 1, I've flown with AC on 16 AQS, earned a pathetic 3796 AQM and spent $4,619 AQD; 2. For the remainder of the year, I'm guaranteed to reach 24 AQS, decent likelihood to exceed that and earn my first status. But nowhere near required AQM and way beyond required AQD; 3. No telling if I'll be traveling this much next year, likelihood is low; 4. Put all this together, if I fly AC, every year would be a stretch for me to reach E25K but guaranteed silver and high likelihood of reaching WJ Gold. Making it a no-brainer for me to convert to WJ starting 2021 if I don't maintain AC E25K in 2020. Which circles back to my original question, do they account for spending the same? Would my current $4,619 AQD be equivalent if I had flown on WJ assuming the fares were close? Meaning I'd already be close to WJ Gold by now. |
Originally Posted by chunerrr
(Post 31079616)
Does anyone know if AC and WJ account for spending the same way? Reason why I ask is as follows.
I've been following Flyertalk on and off for years, never contributed anything because I'm only a semi-frequent traveler. Not the general public who mostly fly once or twice a year but also have never earned any status in the past. Changed job last year and traveling more but still nowhere near most on this forum. However, looking at the first 4 months and the remaining 8 of this year, I seem to have arrived at the following conclusion: WJ is much better for the semi-frequent domestic business travelers than AC: 1. Since Jan 1, I've flown with AC on 16 AQS, earned a pathetic 3796 AQM and spent $4,619 AQD; 2. For the remainder of the year, I'm guaranteed to reach 24 AQS, decent likelihood to exceed that and earn my first status. But nowhere near required AQM and way beyond required AQD; 3. No telling if I'll be traveling this much next year, likelihood is low; 4. Put all this together, if I fly AC, every year would be a stretch for me to reach E25K but guaranteed silver and high likelihood of reaching WJ Gold. Making it a no-brainer for me to convert to WJ starting 2021 if I don't maintain AC E25K in 2020. Which circles back to my original question, do they account for spending the same? Would my current $4,619 AQD be equivalent if I had flown on WJ assuming the fares were close? Meaning I'd already be close to WJ Gold by now. You'll need to also compare the benefits of WS G vs. AC P25K and other factors including fare types and rules, and those aren't identical with AC and WS. Also, if your work begins to take you to places where WS doesn't fly but AC does, then you'll need to also take that into account. But if WS works for you at this juncture, then more power to you. |
Best to check the WS website.
"Subject to the exclusions below, annual qualifying spend is one hundred per cent of the amount spent on eligible published base fares for WestJet-marketed flights you have flown within a qualifying year and, twenty per cent of the individual portion of the base price of eligible WestJet Vacations packages you have booked on or after August 20, 2018 and completed within a qualifying year." https://www.westjet.com/en-ca/contac...estjet-rewards So, AC uses Base Fare and YQ, WS uses Base Fare - I assume they don't tack on YQ. It should be the same. |
Originally Posted by ChrisA330
(Post 31079643)
Best to check the WS website.
"Subject to the exclusions below, annual qualifying spend is one hundred per cent of the amount spent on eligible published base fares for WestJet-marketed flights you have flown within a qualifying year and, twenty per cent of the individual portion of the base price of eligible WestJet Vacations packages you have booked on or after August 20, 2018 and completed within a qualifying year." So, AC uses Base Fare and YQ, WS uses Base Fare - I assume they don't tack on YQ. It should be the same. If anyone has feedback/disagreement on my specific scenario I welcome the insights. Using corporate agency I'm only allowed to book lowest logical fare, hence the low AQM earning power. The only way for me to maintain status with AC is through segments, which I have a hard time seeing myself doing year after year. Earning any sort of status with WS would be so much easier and I assume it's better to have some sort of status than none at all. |
Pick the status based on the airline you want to fly, not vice versa.
|
Originally Posted by canadiancow
(Post 31079771)
Pick the status based on the airline you want to fly, not vice versa.
|
Originally Posted by Academic
(Post 31079805)
And the benefits you might accrue once you get some status -- priority check-in, free luggage, Lounge access etc.
|
Originally Posted by canadiancow
(Post 31079815)
No, that's pretty much the opposite of what I said.
|
Originally Posted by canadiancow
(Post 31079771)
Pick the status based on the airline you want to fly, not vice versa.
Maybe I'm better suited to stay off this forum. :D |
Originally Posted by chunerrr
(Post 31079885)
I don't get it. For someone that doesn't fly that many segments per year, wouldn't you choose to achieve some sort of status (vs. none) and choose the airline that you can actually achieve that status because of it?
However, @canadiancow is giving some experienced advice... and I agree with it, although again that's MHO. When I first started flying, I had the same thought - just get status on whatever I could. |
I appreciate the challenges. Had always had a slight preference flying AC over WS. I'll get a taste of P25K later 2019 and all of 2020 and will strive to maintain it. We shall see.
|
Originally Posted by chunerrr
(Post 31079684)
Using corporate agency I'm only allowed to book lowest logical fare, hence the low AQM earning power.
I've yet to make that argument, but I am willing to die on that particular hill if and when necessary. |
Originally Posted by chunerrr
(Post 31079885)
I don't get it. For someone that doesn't fly that many segments per year, wouldn't you choose to achieve some sort of status (vs. none) and choose the airline that you can actually achieve that status because of it?
Maybe I'm better suited to stay off this forum. :D For *me*, flying from Halifax to a few Canadian and mostly US destinations, AC (and UA via *A) is and effective lazy choice. Status makes the 140 segments/year tolerable. |
OP,
Beware chasing status, there are many on this board who will likely envy you. By not having allegiance to a specific airline you have the freedom to choose the flight schedule, etc. that best suits your needs. Instead of chasing status you might be better served getting a credit card such as the Amex Platinum card which can get you lounge access, etc. And, as someone else mentioned does either WS or AC get you to all of the places you need to go? Even if you could concentrate your flying on a specific airline, you might still have to split your flying to get where you need to. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoy having my various statuses, but its like an addiction. At year end, I start spending personal money and making trips I likely shouldn't just to renew if I'm short of the required cut-off (which is what the companies want you to do). |
@YEG USER is correct. Don't chase status.
That way, it's one less person to compete for upgrades. :p |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:49 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.