Could AC Buy Transat? 16May19 Update: AC enters into agreement to buy Transat
#122
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,918
Keeping Rouge and AC in different terminals would defeat the goal of having easy transfers and of an economy of scale. It is much less costly to support operations in one terminal. Swapping aircraft when needed would be easier too.
#123
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 980
Indeed. So Rouge, AC Mainline and AC-Transat all in T1 would be the most logical.
#124
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Programs: *G
Posts: 2,304
Routine ops, not to mention swapping, is already a problem. Aircraft arriving at Int'l/TB but departing from domestic etc lead to delays, and are likely not allowed for in turnaround times.
#125
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver
Programs: Aeroplan, Mileage Plus, WestJet Gold, AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,026
Out of curiosity how much capacity does TS suck up? Perhaps this is something they could cram into the already overloaded T1? I, for one, would be concerned about AC sharding their flights to T1 and T3. For instance, AC could move Rogue/TS flights into T3 and keep mainline at T1. The concern here would be that the facilities at T3 aren't nearly as good as T1. Would AC bother building a MLL there for their Elites and those travelling in Premium Rogue? What about Priority check-in? This says nothing about how transfers would work going from mainline/regional over to Rogue. Perhaps AC would have shuttle buses to ferry passengers between T3 and T1 much like what UA does at EWR. Even then, things get tricky given how messed up the departure lounge situation is at YYZ (i.e. International and Domestic flights being segregated).
Safe Travels,
James
Safe Travels,
James
#126
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver
Programs: Aeroplan, Mileage Plus, WestJet Gold, AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,026
I don't think T3 could accommodate Rouge over there.
#127
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Safe Travels,
James
#129
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
-James
#131
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: YEG
Posts: 3,925
Alternatively AC/TS could use T1 and the IFT similar to how things worked during T1 construction. I’ve not been to the IFT since those times but the old MLL that was there could likely be renovated and pressed into service once more.
#132
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Perhaps they could reactivate Terminal 2 which closed a while ago as well? IIRC it was closed in the mid 2000's so unsure how up to date it is on security and amenities!
#133
Suspended
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ord
Programs: UA 1k SPG Platinum
Posts: 365
T3 is slammed? and I was unaware the infield terminal was being used? Is it?
#134
Suspended
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ord
Programs: UA 1k SPG Platinum
Posts: 365
? T2 was demolished
#135
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 980