AC now ranked "one of the worst performers" for OTP
#211
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: YYG
Programs: airlines and hotels and rental cars - oh my!
Posts: 2,993
Still trailing behind Westjet though LOL!!
#212
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Erstwhile Accidental AC E35K
Posts: 2,912
If you can’t walk and chew gum at the same time, stop walking and you’ll be able to chew gum 94.10% of the time.
#213
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: YYC
Programs: BA bronze, Aeroplan peon
Posts: 4,742
They got rid of most of the passengers and the OTP came way up. Think of what their OTP could be if they could get rid of all of those pesky passengers?
#214
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: YVR - MILLS Waypoint (It's the third house on the left)
Programs: AC*SE100K, wood level status in various other programs
Posts: 6,211
#215
Join Date: Aug 2018
Programs: SkyPesos -> MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 672
AC702 (YYZ-EWR) delayed three days in a row. We back to normal 'OTP' now, AC?
#216
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM
Posts: 23,293
Edit out Westjet, and say - look we are better at OTP running skeleton operations than all those other airlines who are back to flying full schedules... rah rah AC!
#217
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: ARN
Programs: AC, SK, Marriott
Posts: 1,148
Getting ahead of themselves though I have no doubt it will be delayed
#218
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Vancouver
Programs: AC SE100K 1MM, FB Platinum, Bonvoy Platinum Elite, IHG Gold Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,602
AC never ceases to disappoint.
#219
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Now that AC is back to some reasonable degree of a regular domestic schedule, I am back to never leaving on time. Waiting to board 247 to YVR and we are already 15 minutes late with no hope of getting out on time. AC will be back to 50-60% OTP very shortly.
AC never ceases to disappoint.
AC never ceases to disappoint.
See, the problem is "time is fluid".
By extension, AC's ON TIME activities can also be observed to be "fluid"
But since you're up there now, on a bird with no wifi, I've done all these fun items for your scrapbook.
FR24 seems to know where you are and what time you left YEG. So yes, your 5:15pm departure was, whatever you'd like to call it.
Looking at FlightAware, it also notes your 5:15pm departure departed, but not at 5:15pm
Looking at EF, you clearly departed at 5:15 but conveniently, you are not landing at whatever time AC said you would.
I note, however, that your flight features "entertainment on demand" so consider my post as your "entertainment on arrival".
EF shows no delays
But I am happy to report that AC Flight Status page kept claiming you departed on time at 5:15pm.
I've been refreshing AC's page and just now, it updated. It seems that you still left on time at 5:15pm which is now on time at 5:28pm. So math.
Now I've also checked my handy AC slide rule and AC abacus because clearly, the math I learned in grade 4 is not the math AC uses.
(And for those of you who read this post and didn't get the humour, get an AC abacus.)
.
#220
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Vancouver
Programs: AC SE100K 1MM, FB Platinum, Bonvoy Platinum Elite, IHG Gold Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,602
@EdmFlyBoi
See, the problem is "time is fluid".
By extension, AC's ON TIME activities can also be observed to be "fluid"
But since you're up there now, on a bird with no wifi, I've done all these fun items for your scrapbook.
FR24 seems to know where you are and what time you left YEG. So yes, your 5:15pm departure was, whatever you'd like to call it.
Looking at FlightAware, it also notes your 5:15pm departure departed, but not at 5:15pm
Looking at EF, you clearly departed at 5:15 but conveniently, you are not landing at whatever time AC said you would.
I note, however, that your flight features "entertainment on demand" so consider my post as your "entertainment on arrival".
EF shows no delays
But I am happy to report that AC Flight Status page kept claiming you departed on time at 5:15pm.
I've been refreshing AC's page and just now, it updated. It seems that you still left on time at 5:15pm which is now on time at 5:28pm. So math.
Now I've also checked my handy AC slide rule and AC abacus because clearly, the math I learned in grade 4 is not the math AC uses.
(And for those of you who read this post and didn't get the humour, get an AC abacus.)
.
See, the problem is "time is fluid".
By extension, AC's ON TIME activities can also be observed to be "fluid"
But since you're up there now, on a bird with no wifi, I've done all these fun items for your scrapbook.
FR24 seems to know where you are and what time you left YEG. So yes, your 5:15pm departure was, whatever you'd like to call it.
Looking at FlightAware, it also notes your 5:15pm departure departed, but not at 5:15pm
Looking at EF, you clearly departed at 5:15 but conveniently, you are not landing at whatever time AC said you would.
I note, however, that your flight features "entertainment on demand" so consider my post as your "entertainment on arrival".
EF shows no delays
But I am happy to report that AC Flight Status page kept claiming you departed on time at 5:15pm.
I've been refreshing AC's page and just now, it updated. It seems that you still left on time at 5:15pm which is now on time at 5:28pm. So math.
Now I've also checked my handy AC slide rule and AC abacus because clearly, the math I learned in grade 4 is not the math AC uses.
(And for those of you who read this post and didn't get the humour, get an AC abacus.)
.
#221
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: AC SE100k, Marriott Titanium, UA Silver
Posts: 2,646
@EdmFlyBoi
See, the problem is "time is fluid".
By extension, AC's ON TIME activities can also be observed to be "fluid"
Now I've also checked my handy AC slide rule and AC abacus because clearly, the math I learned in grade 4 is not the math AC uses.
(And for those of you who read this post and didn't get the humour, get an AC abacus.)
.
See, the problem is "time is fluid".
By extension, AC's ON TIME activities can also be observed to be "fluid"
Now I've also checked my handy AC slide rule and AC abacus because clearly, the math I learned in grade 4 is not the math AC uses.
(And for those of you who read this post and didn't get the humour, get an AC abacus.)
.
#222
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,294
#223
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Erstwhile Accidental AC E35K
Posts: 2,912
Here's the problem, as determined by Albert Einstein and explained by Britannica.com:
time dilation, in the theory of special relativity, the “slowing down” of a clock as determined by an observer who is in relative motion with respect to that clock. In special relativity, an observer in inertial (i.e., nonaccelerating) motion has a well-defined means of determining which events occur simultaneously with a given event. A second inertial observer, who is in relative motion with respect to the first, however, will disagree with the first observer regarding which events are simultaneous with that given event. (Neither observer is wrong in this determination; rather, their disagreement merely reflects the fact that simultaneity is an observer-dependent notion in special relativity.) A notion of simultaneity is required in order to make a comparison of the rates of clocks carried by the two observers.